Skip to main content
Log in

Can the Isgur-Karl model be successfully applied to meson-baryon two-body reactions?

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

Abstract

Via the additivity assumption, the model of baryon structure formulated by Isgur and Karl is applied to quasi-two-body meson-baryon scattering. The model offers no improvement over the strictSU (6) case, nor will other configuration-mixing models which do not alter the relative weight of the two diquark components of the nucleon. The features of the Isgur-Karl model are compared to those of a diquark model which has been successful in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Isgur, G. Karl: Phys. Rev.D18, 4187 (1978); Phys. Rev.D19, 2653 (1979); Phys. Rev.D20, 1191 (1979) and references cited therein; N. Isgur: Lectures at the XIV International School of Subnuclear Physics, Erice, Italy, 1978 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quite recently the model has also been used in another dynamical field, namely to predict the baryon pseudoscalar and photon couplings. See R. Koniuk, N. Isgur: Phys. Rev.D21, 1868 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Zralek et al.: Phys. Rev.D19, 820 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, S.L. Glashow: Phys. Rev.D12, 147 (1975); T. De Grand, R.L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, J. Kiskis: Phys Rev.D12, 2060 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  5. For related work see D. Gromes, I.O. Stamatescu: Nucl. Phys.B112, 213 (1976); W. Celmaster: Phys. Rev.D15, 139 (1977); D. Gromes: Nucl. Phys.B130, 18 (1977); D. Gromes: Nucl.B131, 80 (1977); E. Ellwanger: Nucl. Phys.B139, 422 (1978); A Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, J.C. Raynal: Phys. Rev.D18, 1591 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.D. Carlitz, S.D. Ellis, R. Savit: Phys. Lett.68B, 443 (1977); N. Isgur: Acta Phys. Polon.B8, 1081 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Alexander, H.J. Lipkin, F. Scheck: Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 412 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.J. Lipkin, F. Scheck: Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 347 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Hirsch et al.: Phys. Lett.36B, 139 (1971); E. Hirsch, U. Karshon, H.J. Lipkin: Phys. Lett.36B, 385 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.C. Kluyver et al.: Nucl. Phys.B140, 141 (1978); G.G. Massaro: thesis University of Amsterdam, 1978 (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Ader et al.: Nucl. Phys.B82, 237 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.J. Lipkin: Nucl. Phys.B20, 652 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  13. For details see [12] and H.J. Lipkin: Phys. Rev.183, 1221 (1969); A. Krzywicki, A. Le Yaouanc: Nucl. Phys.B14, 246 (1969) In general, the operator T″ is multiplied by a Wigner rotation. It is not difficult to prove that our predictions in the transversity frame are not affected by the Wigner rotations. We have therefore omitted them from (5)

    Google Scholar 

  14. The validity of this assumption is discussed in H. Lipkin: Phys. Rep.8C, 174 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. Isgur, G. Karl, and R. Koniuk: Phys. Rev. Lett.41, 1269 (1978); See also [1]

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.O. Holmgren et al.: Nucl. Phys.B119, 261 (1977); G.G. Massaro et al.: Phys. Lett.66B, 385 (1977); F. Marzano et al.: Nucl. Phys.B123, 203 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J. Losty et al.: Nucl. Phys.B133, 38 (1978); M. Aguilar-Benitez et al.: Nucl. Phys. B124, 189 (1977). The 207-1 is derived using isospin relations from the data for 207-2

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.U. Chung et al.: Phys. Rev.D12, 693 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.A.J. Matthews et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 400 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Bialas, K. Zalewski: Phys. Lett.26B, 180 (1968), Nucl. Phys.B6, 449, 465, 478 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.g., K. Böckmann et al.: Phys. Lett.28B, 72 (1963); M. Aderholz et al., Nucl. Phys.B8, 503 (1968); A. Kotanski, K. Zalewski: Nucl. Phys.B13, 119 (1969); H. Friedman, R.R. Ross: Phys. Rev. Lett.22, 152 (1969); W. De Baere et al.: Nuovo Cimento56, 397 (1969); B. Haber et al.: Nucl. Phys.B17, 289 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.B. Lichtenberg, L.J. Tassie, P.J. Keleman: Phys. Rev.167, 1535 (1968); J. Carroll, D.B. Lichtenberg, J. Franklin: Phys. Rev.174, 1681 (1968); D.B. Lichtenberg: Phys. Rev.178, 2197 (1969) For an updated review of the diquark model see R.T. Van de Walle, Subnuclear Physics Series, Ed. A. Zichich, Vol. 17, “Point-like Structure Inside and Outside Hadrons”, 1979 (to be published)

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Zralek: University of Nijmegen Internal Report No. HEN-172, 1978 (unpublished)

  24. Z. Dziembowski, W.J. Metzger, R.T. Van de Walle: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields9, 93 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Capella et al.: Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields3, 329 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  26. H.J. Lipkin: Phys. Lett.B35, 534 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pene, J.C. Raynal: Phys. Rev.D12, 2137 (1975); Phys. Rev.D13, 1519 (E) (1976); Phys. Rev.D15, 844 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dziembowski, Z., Metzger, W.J. & Zralek, M. Can the Isgur-Karl model be successfully applied to meson-baryon two-body reactions?. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 14, 201–207 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571819

Keywords

Navigation