Skip to main content
Log in

Extractives in the cones of Pinus species

Extraktstoffe in den Zapfen verschiedener Kiefernarten

  • Originals Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amount and composition of lipophilic and hydrophilic extractives were analyzed in the cones of five coniferous species, namely Pinus halepensis, P. brutia, P. pinea, P. sylvestris and P. nigra, growing natively in Turkey. Lipophilic extractives amounts, identified by GC, were found to be the highest in P. brutia (35.1 mg g−1) and P. halepensis (31.3 mg g−1) while the lowest values were found in P. sylvestris (9.0 mg g−1). Resin acids were the major lipophilic group in all cones. The predominant resin acids were abietic acid in P. pinea, P. halepensis and P. brutia, dehydroabietic acid in P. sylvestris, and isopimaric acid in P. nigra. Compared to lipophilic extractives, the amount of total hydrophilic extractives showed similar gravimetric values while sugars and sugar alcohols were the dominant group.

Zusammenfassung

Untersucht wurden die Menge und die Zusammensetzung der lipophilen und hydrophilen Extraktstoffe in den Zapfen von fünf verschiedenen, in der Türkei beheimateten Nadelbaumarten (Pinus halepensis, P. brutia, P. pinea, P. sylvestris und P. nigra.). Der höchste Anteil an mittels Gaschromatograph ermittelten lipophilen Extraktstoffe wurde in P. brutia (35,1 mg g−1) und P. halepensis (31,3 mg−1) nachgewiesen, während Pinus sylvestris (9,0 mg g−1) den niedrigsten Anteil aufwies. Der wichtigste lipophile Bestandteil waren in allen Zapfen die Harzsäuren. Die vorwiegenden Harzsäuren waren Abietinsäure in P. pinea, P. halepensis und P. brutia, Dehydroabietinsäure in P. sylvestris sowie Isopimarsäure in P. nigra. Die gravimetrischen Werte der gesamten hydrophilen Extraktstoffe waren vergleichbar mit denen der lipophilen Extraktstoffe, wobei Zucker und Zuckeralkohol die dominante Gruppe waren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed Z, Siddiqui M, Khan I (1969) Combined effects of diphenyliodonium chloride, pine oils and mustard oil soaps on certain microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 17(6):857–860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraja S, Vega-Lópeza S, Kaula N, Schönlaub F, Rohdewaldb P, Jialala I (2002) Supplementation with a pine bark extract rich in polyphenols increases plasma antioxidant capacity and alters the plasma lipoprotein profile. Lipids 37(10):931–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt TL, Young RA (1996) Conifer seed cone proanthocyanidin polymers: characterization by 13C NMR spectroscopy and determination of antifungal activities. J Agric Food Chem 42:1704–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganenko TV, Khamidullina EA, Medvedeva SA (2006) Chemistry of Pinus sylvestris cones. Chem Nat Compd 42(5):612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kähkönen MP, Hopia AI, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M (1999) Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem 47(10):3954–3962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Micales JA, Han JS, Davis JL, Young RA (1994) Chemical composition and fungitoxic activities of pine cone extractives. In: Llewellyn GC, Dashek WV, O’Rear CE (eds) Biodeterioration research. Plenum, New York, pp 317–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L, Rimbach G, Virgili F (1999) Antioxidant activity and biological properties of a procyanidin rich extract from Pine. Free Radic Biol Med 27:704–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Williamson E, Zloh M, Gibbons S (2005) Isopimaric acid from Pinus nigra shows activity against multidrug-resistant and EMRSA strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Phytother Res 19:538–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan ZM, Jeon YM, Moon SS (2008) Labdane-type diterpenes active against acne from pine cones (Pinus densiflora). Planta Med 74:449–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ucar MB, Ucar G (2008) Lipophilic extractives and main components of black pine cones. Chem Nat Compd 44(3):380–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villagomez HZ, Peterson DM, Herrin L, Young RA (2005) Antioxidant activity of different components of pine species. Holzforschung 59:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Wang J (2008) Two new diterpenoid acids from Pinus koraiensis. Fitoterapia 79:179–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willför S, Ali M, Karonen M, Reunanen M, Arfan M, Harlamow R (2009) Extractives in bark of different conifer species growing in Pakistan. Holzforschung 63:551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their thanks to Prof. Dr. Bjarne Holmbom, Laboratory of Wood and Paper Chemistry, Åbo Akademi, Turku, Finland for his scientific support. This work is part of a project supported by Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayben Kilic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilic, A., Hafizoglu, H., Dönmez, I.E. et al. Extractives in the cones of Pinus species. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 69, 37–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-010-0421-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-010-0421-2

Keywords

Navigation