Abstract
“Climate change communication” is taking the strategic position in the international and national politics around the globe. In the recent decade, different developing nations have started considering “climate change communication” as an integral part of the political campaigns and sustainable development. Specifically, the current document comprised of two sections. In the first section of the study, authors briefly compared the attributes related to “climate change communication” in the mainstream political parties’ manifesto for the general election 2018 in Pakistan in a qualitative manner. In the second part, the difference of opinion among voters of mainstream political parties towards “climate change” was examined. In a bird’s eye view, the perceived seriousness of “climate change” as a real challenge among voters mapped by the independent factors of “urbanization,” “industrialization,” “transportation,” and “waste management” for sustainable development through the primary quantitative survey of 732 voters in the country. The finding highlights (1) public understanding of “socio-scientific issues,” i.e., climate change is easy to communicate, and (2) how political parties are framing and communicating about “climate change” plays a significant role in climate change communication. The study concludes that “climate change communication” holds a critical role in developing regions’ future political discourse to shape sustainable development policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abildtrup J, Audsley E, Fekete-Farkas M, Giupponi C, Gylling M, Rosato P, Rounsevell M (2006) Socio-economic scenario development for the assessment of climate change impacts on agricultural land use: a pairwise comparison approach. Environ Sci Policy 9:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.002
Adelle C (2015) Contexualising the tool development process through a knowledge brokering approach: the case of climate change adaptation and agriculture. Environ Sci Policy 51:316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.010
Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY, Neuman A (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Chang 23:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
Antilla L (2005) Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15:338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003
Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Glob Environ Chang 21:995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
Bain PG, Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C (2012) Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat Clim Chang 2:603–603. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1636
Benegal SD, Scruggs LA (2018) Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting. Clim Change 148:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2192-4
Bernauer T (2013) Climate change politics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062011-154926
Bhattacherjee A, Sanford C (2016) Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS Q 30:805–825
Biagini B, Bierbaum R, Stults M, Dobardzic S, McNeeley SM (2014) A typology of adaptation actions: a global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the global environment facility. Glob Environ Chang 25:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.003
Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H, Morecroft MD, Rey D (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 20:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
Bollen KA (1990) Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol Bull 107:256–259
Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher A (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Underst Sci 9:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301
Boudet H, Clarke C, Bugden D, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2014) “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2):125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: a case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38:1190–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
Brossard D, Shanahan J, McComas K (2004) Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Commun Soc 7:359–377
Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Clim Change 114:169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
Carter N (2013) Greening the mainstream: party politics and the environment. Env Polit 22:73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755391
Carvalho A (2007) Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Underst Sci 16:223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775
Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Anal 25:1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00692.x
Carvalho A, van Wessel M, Maeseele P (2017) Communication practices and political engagement with climate change: a research agenda. Environ Commun 11:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1241815
Corbett JB (2004) Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004270234
Corner A, Randall A (2011) Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement. Glob Environ Chang 21:1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.05.002
Corner A, Crompton T, Davidson S, Hawkins, R., Kasser, T., Lertzman, R., … Witmarsh, L. (2010) Communicating climate change to mass public audiences. Climate Change, (September), 14
Dickinson JL, Crain R, Yalowitz S, Cherry TM (2013) How framing climate change influences citizen scientists’ intentions to do something about it. J Environ Educ 44:145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.742032
Dong Y, Hu S, Zhu J (2018) From source credibility to risk perception: how and when climate information matters to action. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:410–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.012
Douglas KM, Sutton RM (2015) Climate change: why the conspiracy theories are dangerous. Bull At Sci 71:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908
Ebrahim ZT Does the environment matter in Pakistan’s elections? - Pakistan - DAWN.COM. https://www.dawn.com/news/1419200. Accessed 8 Sep 2018
Elrick-Barr CE, Smith TF, Preston BL, Thomsen DC, Baum S (2016) How are coastal households responding to climate change? Environ Sci Policy 63:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.013
Feldman L, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2012) Climate on Cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. Int J Press 17:3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
Foy JE, LoCasto PC, Briner SW, Dyar S (2017) Would a madman have been so wise as this? The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Mem Cogn 45:281–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
Fraj-Andrés E, Martínez-Salinas E (2014) Impact of environmental knowledge on ecological consumer behaviour. Gastroenterol Endosc 19:73–102. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v19n03
Gleim MR, Smith JS, Andrews D, Cronin JJ (2013) Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. J Retail 89(1):44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001
Godden, B. (2004). Sample Size Formulas. Retrieved March 23, 2017, from www.williamgodden.com/ website: http://www.williamgodden.com/samplesizeformula.pdf
Hahn U, Harris AJL, Corner A (2016) Public reception of climate science: coherence, reliability, and independence. Top Cogn Sci 8:180–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12173
Hart PS, Nisbet EC (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication. Communic Res 39:701–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646
Hong S, Tam KY, Hong S (2006) Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: the case of mobile data services. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0088
Hooper D, Mullen J, Hooper D et al (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6:53–60
Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 6:1–55
Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change. ENDS Rep Carbon Yea 41-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200
Jang SM (2013) Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. J Environ Psychol 36:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003
Jarreau PB, Altinay Z, Reynolds A (2017) Best practices in environmental communication: a case study of Louisiana’s coastal crisis. Environ Commun 11:143–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1094103
Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547
Kahlor L, Rosenthal S (2009) If we seek, do we learn? Sci Commun 30:380–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328798
Kentmen Cin C (2012) Blaming the government for environmental problems. Environ Behav 45:971–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512453840
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77:45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K (2013) The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PLoS One 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
Lombardi D, Seyranian V, Sinatra GM (2014) Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Process 51:75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Chang 17:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
Malaquias RF, Hwang Y (2016) An empirical study on trust in mobile banking: a developing country perspective. Comput Human Behav 54:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.039
Mccright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
Mishal A, Dubey R, Gupta OK, Luo Z (2017) Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. Int J Clim Chang Strateg Manag 9:682–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2016-0168
Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, processes and future directions. WIREs Clim Chang 1:31–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.011
Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 51:12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96:1767–1778. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
Ockwell D, Whitmarsh L, Neill SO (2009) Science communication. Sci Commun 30:305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328969
Pavlou PA, Tan Y-HTY-H, Gefen D (2003) The transitional role of institutional trust in online interorganizational relationships. 36th Annu Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci 2003 Proc 0:1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174574
Pike C, Doppelt B, Herr M (2010) Climate Communications and Behavior Change: A Guide for Practitioners. In Climate Leadership Initiative 35:1–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012438465
Qamar Uz Zaman, C. (2017). Climate Change Profile of Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS178761
Ryan D, & Ramirez A (2016) The politics of climate change at the city level: insights from a comparative study of Buenos Aires, São Paulo and Mexico City
Ryan D, Ryan D (2017) Politics and climate change: exploring the relationship between political parties and climate issues in Latin America. Ambient Soc 20:271–286. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asocex0007v2032017
Salam Abdul Pakistan is one of the world’s leading victims of global warming. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/07/24/pakistan-one-worlds-leading-victims-global-warming/809509002/. Accessed 8 Sep 2018
Sharif A, Medvecky F (2018) Climate change news reporting in Pakistan: as qualitative analysis of environmental journalists and the barriers they face. J. Sci Commun 17:1–17. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010203
Sönke K, Eckstein D, Dorsch L, Fischer L (2015) Global climate risk index 2016: who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2014 and 1995 to 2014
Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
Tam KP, Chan HW (2017) Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: a cross-cultural psychology perspective. J Environ Psychol 53:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001
Tam KP, Chan HW (2018) Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: multilevel evidence. Glob Environ Chang 48:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
Vainio A, Paloniemi R (2013) Does belief matter in climate change action? Public Underst Sci 22:382–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511410268
Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11:342–365
Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66:315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming”. Public Underst Sci 18:401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506073088
Zaheer K, Colom A (2013) Pakistan: How the people of Pakistan live with climate change and what communication can do
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Azfar Anwar, Rongting Zhou, and Aqsa Azfar are co-first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anwar, M.A., Zhou, R., Sajjad, A. et al. Climate change communication as political agenda and voters’ behavior. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 29946–29961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06134-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06134-6