Skip to main content
Log in

Organic fraction of municipal solid waste from mechanical selection: biological stabilization and recovery options

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although current trends address towards prevention strategies, the organic fraction of municipal solid waste is greatly produced, especially in high-income contexts. Its recovery-oriented collection is a common practice, but a relevant portion of the biodegradable waste is not source selected. Mechanical and biological treatments (MBT) are the most common option to sort and stabilize the biodegradable matter ending in residual waste stream. Following the changes of the framework around waste management, this paper aimed at analyzing the quality of the mechanically selected organic waste produced in MBT plants, in order to discuss its recovery options. The material performance was obtained by its composition as well as by its main chemical and physical parameters; biological stability was also assessed by both aerobic and anaerobic methods. On this basis, the effectiveness of an aerobic biostabilization process was assessed at pilot scale. After 21 days of treatment, results proved that the biomass had reached an acceptable biostabilization level, with a potential Dynamic Respirometric Index (DRIP) value lower than the limit required for its use as daily or final landfill cover material. However, the final stabilization level was seen to be influenced by scaling factors and the 21 days of treatment turned to be not so adequate when applied in the existing full-scale facility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adani F, Tambone F, Gotti A (2004) Biostabilization of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 24:775–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ANPA (2000) Analisi merceologica dei rifiuti urbani. RTI CTN_RIF 1/2000.

  • AWWA-APHA-WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bari QH, Koenig A (2001) Effect of air recirculation and reuse on composting of organic solid waste. Resour Conserv Recy 33:93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrena R, Vázquez F, Sánchez A (2008) Dehydrogenase activity as a method for monitoring the composting process. Bioresour Technol 99:905–908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrena R, d’Imporzano G, Ponsá S, Gea T, Artola A, Vázquez F, Sánchez A (2009) In search of a reliable technique for the determination of the biological stability of the organic matter in the mechanical–biological treated waste. J Hazard Mater 162:1065–1072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belgiorno V, Panza D, Russo L, Amodio V, Cesaro A (2011) Alternative stabilisation options of mechanically sorted organic fraction from municipal solid waste prior to landfill disposal. Int J Environ Eng 3(3–4):318–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borglin SE, Hazen TC, Oldenburg CM, Zawisianski PT (2004) Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste. J Air Waste Manage Asoc 54:815–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casas O, López M, Quílez M, Martinez-Farre X, Hornero G, Rovira C, Pinilla MR, Ramos PM, Borges B, Marques H, Silva Girão P (2014) Wireless sensor network for smart composting monitoring and control. Measurement 47:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchi F, Traverso P, Pavan P, Bolzonella D, Innocenti L (2003) Characteristics of OFMSW and behaviour of the anaerobic digestion. In Mata Alvarez J (ed) Biomethanization of municipal solid waste, 1st edn. Padstow (UK), pp 141–179

  • Cesaro A, Belgiorno V, Guida M (2015) Compost from organic solid waste: quality assessment and European regulations for its sustainable use. Resour Conserv Recy 94:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colón J, Mestre-Montserrat M, Puig-Ventosa I, Sánchez A (2013) Performance of compostable baby used diapers in the composting process with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 33:1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consonni S, Dainese C (2008) Tecnologie per il recupero di energia dai rifiuti solidi urbani. In Giugliano M. and Grosso M. (eds) Proceedings La gestione integrata dei rifiuti. 63° Corso di aggiornamento in Ingegneria Sanitaria-Ambientale, Milano, pp. XIII 1–36.

  • Denes J, Tremier A, Menasseri-Aubry S, Walter C, Gratteau L, Barrington S (2014) Numerical simulation of organic waste aerobic biodegradation: a new way to correlate respiration kinetics and organic matter fractionation. Waste Manage 36:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria F, Micale C (2014) What is the acceptable margin of error for the oxygen uptake method in evaluating the reactivity of organic waste? Waste Manage 34:1356–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Maria F, Micale C (2015) Life cycle analysis of management options for organic waste collected in an urban area. Environ Sci Pollut R 22:248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Fadel M, Bou-Zeida E, Chahineb W, Alayli B (2002) Temporal variation of leachate quality from pre-sorted and baled municipal solid waste with high organic and moisture content. Waste Manage 22:269–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FhG-IBP (2014) D 2.2 Waste profiling. http://www.waste2go.eu/. Accessed 29 June 2015

  • Getahun T, Nigusie A, Entele T, Van Gerven T, Van der Bruggen B (2012) Effect of turning frequencies on composting biodegradable municipal solid waste quality. Resour Conserv Recy 65:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günay A, Çetin M (2013) Determination of aerobic biodegradation kinetics of olive oil mill wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 85:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez MC, Martín MA, Serrano A, Chica AF (2015) Monitoring of pile composting process of OFMSW at full scale and evaluation of odour emission impact. J Environ Manage 15:531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayalakshmi S, Joseph K, Sukumaran V (2009) Bio hydrogen generation from kitchen waste in an inclined plug flow reactor. Int J of Hydrogen Energy 34:8854–8858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juul N, Münster M, Ravn H, Ljunggren Söderman M (2013) Challenges when performing economic optimization of waste treatment: a review. Waste Manage 33:1918–1925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalemelawa F, Nishihara E, Endo T, Ahmad Z, Yeasmin R, Tenywa MM, Yamamoto S (2012) An evaluation of aerobic and anaerobic composting of banana peels treated with different inoculums for soil nutrient replenishment. Bioresour Technol 126:375–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamdhad AS, Pasha M, Kazmi AA (2008) Stability evaluation of compost by respiration techniques in a rotary drum composter. Resour Conserv Recy 52:829–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil A, Domeizel M, Prudent P (2009) Monitoring of green waste composting process based on redox potential. Bioresour Technol 99:6037–6045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolář L, Kužel S, Peterka J, Štindl P, Plát V (2008) Agrochemical value of organic matter of fermenter wastes in biogas production. Plant Soil Environ 54(8):321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolář L, Kužel S, Horáček J, Čechová V, Borová-Batt J, Peterka J (2009) Labile fractions of soil organic matter, their quantity and quality. Plant Soil Environ 55(6):245–251

  • Lesteur M, Bellon-Maurel V, Gonzalez C, Latrille E, Roger JM, Junqua G, Steyer JP (2010) Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: a review. Process Biochem 45:431–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López M, Soliva M, Martínez-Farré FX, Fernández M, Huerta-Pujol O (2010) Evaluation of MSW organic fraction for composting: separate collection or mechanical sorting. Resour Conserv Recy 54:222–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López M, Martinez-Farre X, Casas O, Quilez M, Polo J, Lopez O, Hornero G, Pinilla MR, Rovira C, Ramos PM, Borges B, Marques H, Silva Girão P (2014) Intelligent composting assisted by a wireless sensing network. Waste Manage 34:738–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J (2013) Two-fraction anaerobic fermentation of grass waste. J Sci Food Agric 93:2410–2414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J, Kondo Y, Ueno M, Kawamitsu Y (2013) Commercial-scale utilization of greenhouse residues. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 60(2):253–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J (2014a) Biotechnological partition of the grass silage to streamline its complex energy utilization. Int J Green Energy 11:962–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J (2014b) Economically oriented process optimization in waste management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:7400–7402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marousek J, Zeman R, Vaníčková R, Hašková S (2014) New concept of urban green management. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:1835–1838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Münster M, Ravn H, Hedegaard K, Juul N, Ljunggren Söderman M (2015) Economic and environmental optimization of waste treatment. Waste Manage 38:486–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nallathambi Gunaseelan V (1997) Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 13(1/2):83–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl O, Firth A, MacLeod I, Baird J (2008) Anaerobic co-digestion of mechanically biologically treated municipal solid waste with primary sewage sludge—a feasibility study. Bioresour Technol 99:3354–3364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsá S, Gea T, Alerm L, Cerezo J, Sánchez A (2008) Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process. Waste Manage 28:2735–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsá S, Gea T, Sánchez A (2010) The effect of storage and mechanical pretreatment on the biological stability of municipal solid wastes. Waste Manage 30:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponsá S, Puyuelo B, Gea T, Sánchez A (2011) Modelling the aerobic degradation of organic wastes based on slowly and rapidly degradable fractions. Waste Manage 31:1472–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puyuelo B, Gea T, Sánchez A (2014) GHG emissions during the high-rate production of compost using standard and advanced aeration strategies. Chemosphere 109:64–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson HD, Knox K, Bone BD, Picken A (2005) Leachate quality from landfilled MBT waste. Waste Manage 25:383–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez L, Cerrillo MI, García-Albiach V, Villaseñor J (2012) Domestic sewage sludge composting in a rotary drum reactor: optimizing the thermophilic stage. J Environ Manage 112:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggieri L, Gea T, Mompeó M, Sayara T, Sánchez A (2008) Performance of different systems for the composting of the source-selected organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Biosyst Eng 101:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salati S, Scaglia B, Di Gregorio A, Carrera A, Adani F (2013) The use of the dynamic respiration index to predict the potential MSW-leachate impacts after short term mechanical biological treatment. Bioresour Technol 128:351–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scaglia B, Adani F (2008) An index for quantifying the aerobic reactivity of municipal solid wastes and derived waste products. Sci Total Environ 394:183–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scaglia B, Confalonieri R, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2010) Estimating biogas production of biologically treated municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol 101:945–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scaglia B, Acutis M, Adani F (2011) Precision determination for the dynamic respirometric index (DRI) method used for biological stability evaluation on municipal solid waste and derived products. Waste Manage 31:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaglia B, Salati S, Di Gregorio A, Carrera A, Tambone F, Adani F (2013) Short mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste allows landfill impact reduction saving waste energy content. Bioresour Technol 143:131–138

  • Sidelko R, Janowska B, Walendzik B, Siebielska I (2010) Two composting phases running in different process conditions timing relationship. Bioresour Technol 101:6692–6698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sormunen K, Einola J, Ettala M, Rintala J (2008) Leachate and gaseous emissions from initial phases of landfilling mechanically and mechanically-biologically treated municipal solid waste residuals. Bioresour Technol 99:2399–2409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sri Shalini S, Karthikeyan OP, Joseph K (2010) Biological stability of municipal solid waste from simulated landfills under tropical environment. Bioresour Technol 101:845–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg C, Franke-Whittle IH, Kauppi S, Yu D, Romantschuk M, Insam H, Jönsson H (2011) Characterisation of source-separated household waste intended for composting. Bioresour Technol 102:2859–2867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tambone F, Scaglia B, Scotti S, Adani F (2011) Effects of biodrying process on municipal solid waste properties. Bioresour Technol 102:7443–7450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer B, Hrad M, Huber-Humer M, Watzinger A, Wyhlidal S, Reichenauer TG (2013) Stable isotope signatures for characterising the biological stability of landfilled municipal solid waste. Waste Manage 33:2083–2090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Zhao Y, Long Y, Zhu Y, Wang H, Lu W (2011) Evaluation of the biological stability of waste during landfill stabilization by thermogravimetric analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol 102:9403–9408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Hartman K, Wang F, Liu G, Choate C, Gamble P (2007) Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 98:929–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Paolo Napodano for his technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Cesaro.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerald Thouand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cesaro, A., Russo, L., Farina, A. et al. Organic fraction of municipal solid waste from mechanical selection: biological stabilization and recovery options. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23, 1565–1575 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5345-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5345-2

Keywords

Navigation