Abstract
Biofuel is a renewable energy source for transportation. Given the toxicity associated with particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is not fully understood, investigating the difference of adverse health risks posed between vapor and particulate PAH emissions from biodiesel-fueled engine combustion was the objective of this study. Three different fuel types, including typical diesel, emulsified diesel with a water fraction from 10 to 19% (v/v), and emulsified biodiesel with water (10%) and biofuel fractions from 10 to 40% (v/v), were studied. The fugacity model and risk assessment were conducted to predict the health risks when different fuels were used. In the results, the addition of water and biofuel elevated and reduced the total PAH emissions in the exhausts, respectively. After the emission, chrysene and benzo(a)anthracene were two dominant carcinogenic species in the environment. The excess cancer risk of the PAH emission significantly decreased (e.g., up to two orders of magnitude) while the emulsified biodiesel was applied, with limiting the formation of benzo(a)pyrene being the explanation. The PAH emissions with molecular weights ranging from 166 to 255 g/mol were significantly different between the vapor and particulate phases during the emulsified biodiesel combustion (p < 0.01). From the viewpoint of cancer risk, the contribution posed by the particulate PAHs was significantly greater than those by the vapor PAHs (e.g., from 54% (benzo(a)pyrene) to 76% (benzo(b)fluoranthene)). Benzo(a)pyrene and chrysene represent the species with the highest and lowest risks, respectively. The multi-ringed PAHs with four or five rings were more indicative of potential cancer risk posed by the PAHs associated with particulate matters during combustion of the emulsified biodiesel.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Zaid M (2004) Performance of single cylinder, direct injection diesel engine using water fuel emulsions. Energy Convers Manag 45:697–705
Alahmer A (2013) Influence of using emulsified diesel fuel on the performance and pollutants emitted from diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 73:361–369
Armas O, Ballesteros R, Martos FJ, Agudelo JR (2005) Characterization of light duty diesel engine pollutant emissions using water-emulsified fuel. Fuel 84:1011–1018
Buyukkaya E (2010) Effects of biodiesel on a DI diesel engine performance, emission and combustion characteristics. Fuel 89:3099–3105
CalEPA (1999) Air toxics hot spots program risk assessment guidelines: part 1. The determination of acute reference exposure levels for airborne toxicants. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). https://oehha.ca.gov/air/air-toxics-hot-spots
CalEPA (2015) The air toxics hot spots program guidance manual for preparation of health risk assessments. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). https://oehha.ca.gov/air/air-toxics-hot-spots
Chen WH, Chen ZB, Yuan CS, Hung CH, Ning SK (2016) Investigating the differences between receptor and dispersion modeling for concentration prediction and health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds from petrochemical industrial complexes. J Environ Manag 166:440–449
Cheng CH, Cheung CS, Chan TL, Lee SC, Yao CD, Tsang KS (2008) Comparison of emissions of a direct injection diesel engine operating on biodiesel with emulsified and fumigated methanol. Fuel 87:1870–1879
Han XL, Naeher LP (2006) A review of traffic-related air pollution exposure assessment studies in the developing world. Environ Int 32:106–120
He C, Ge YS, Tan JW, You KW, Han XK, Wang JF (2010) Characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons emissions of diesel engine fueled with biodiesel and diesel. Fuel 89:2040–2046
HRSAC 2008 Compilation of exposure factors in Taiwan. Health Risk and Strategy Assessment Center, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. DOH96-HP-1801, http://docsplayer.com/26101974-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E4%B8%80%E8%88%AC%E6%B0%91%E7%9C%BE%E6%9A%B4%E9%9C%B2%E5%8F%83%E6%95%B8%E5%BD%99%E7%B7%A8.html
IARC (2014) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (WHO)
Kalligeros S, Zannikos F, Stournas S, Lois E, Anastopoulos G, Teas C, Sakellaropoulos F (2003) An investigation of using biodiesel/marine diesel blends on the performance of a stationary diesel engine. Biomass Bioenergy 24:141–149
Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E, Brown RJC (2013) A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int 60:71–80
Liu PWG, Yao YC, Tsai JH, Hsu YC, Chang LP, Chang KH (2008) Source impacts by volatile organic compounds in an industrial city of southern Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 398:154–163
Liu CC, Chen WH, Yuan CS, Lin CS (2014) Multivariate analysis of effects of diurnal temperature and seasonal humidity variations by tropical savanna climate on the emissions of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds. Sci Total Environ 470:311–323
Mackay D, Paterson S (1991) Evaluating the multimedia fate of organic chemicals—a level III fugacity model. Environ Sci Technol 25:427–436
Manoli E, Voutsa D, Samara C (2002) Chemical characterization and source identification/apportionment of fine and coarse air particles in Thessaloniki, Greece. Atmos Environ 36:949–961
MOEABOE (2018) Fuel sale and consumption in different cities of Taiwan (2016). Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affair
Nadeem M, Rangkuti C, Anuar K, Haq MRU, Tan IB, Shah SS (2006) Diesel engine performance and emission evaluation using emulsified fuels stabilized by conventional and gemini surfactants. Fuel 85:2111–2119
Potin O, Rafin C, Veignie E (2004) Bioremediation of an aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-contaminated soil by filamentous fungi isolated from the soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 54:45–52
Ravindra K, Bencs L, Wauters E, de Hoog J, Deutsch F, Roekens E, Bleux N, Berghmans P, Van Grieken R (2006) Seasonal and site-specific variation in vapour and aerosol phase PAHs over Flanders (Belgium) and their relation with anthropogenic activities. Atmos Environ 40:771–785
Ravindra K, Sokhi R, Van Grieken R (2008) Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmos Environ 42:2895–2921
Sheu HL, Lee WJ, Lin SJ, Fang GC, Chang HC, You WC (1997) Particle-bound PAH content in ambient air. Environ Pollut 96:369–382
TWMHW (2008) Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan (NAHSIT) 2005–2008. Health Promotion Administration, Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare (TWMHW). https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=1077&pid=6201
TWMOTC (2018) Statistics of transportation and communications. Taiwan Ministry of Transportation and Communications (TWMOTC) https://www.motc.gov.tw/en/index.jsp
USEPA (2003) Integrated risk information system (IRIS). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). https://www.epa.gov/iris
Weber S, Hoffmann P, Ensling J, Dedik AN, Weinbruch S, Miehe G, Gutlich P, Ortner HM (2000) Characterization of iron compounds from urban and rural aerosol sources. J Aerosol Sci 31:987–997
Yang JJ, Liu CC, Chen WH, Yuan CS, Lin C (2013) Assessing the altitude effect on distributions of volatile organic compounds from different sources by principal component analysis. Environ Sci Processes Impacts 15:972–985
Funding
This study was conducted under the auspices of National Sun Yat-sen University (NSYSU) and Kaohsiung Medical University (NSYSU-KMU Joint Research Project, No. NSYSUKMU 105-I007). The additional financial support was from the Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency (TWEPA) and Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan under the contract number MOST 106-EPA-F-011-001. Its content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
• Vapor and PM PAH emissions and risks by different fuel combustion were studied.
• Fugacity and exposure analyses were done to predict health risks for various fuels.
• Emulsified biodiesel reduced the cancer risk by PAH emission.
• Benzo(a)pyrene represents large portion of the cancer risk by PAH emission.
• Multi-ringed PAHs with 4–5 rings were indicative of cancer risk associated with PM.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 17 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, WH., Chen, GF. & Lin, YC. Influence of emulsified biodiesel on the emission and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the vapor and particulate phases during engine combustion. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 13510–13521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04805-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04805-y