Skip to main content
Log in

Ammonium-nitrogen-contaminated groundwater remediation by a sequential three-zone permeable reactive barrier (multibarrier) with oxygen-releasing compound (ORC)/clinoptilolite/spongy iron: column studies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel sequential permeable reactive barrier (multibarrier), composed of oxygen-releasing compound (ORC)/clinoptilolite/spongy iron zones in series, was proposed for ammonium-nitrogen-contaminated groundwater remediation. Column experiments were performed to: (1) evaluate the overall NH4 +–N removal performance of the proposed multibarrier, (2) investigate nitrogen transformation in the three zones, (3) determine the reaction front progress, and (4) explore cleanup mechanisms for inorganic nitrogens. The results showed that NH4 +–N percent removal by the multibarrier increased up to 90.43 % after 21 pore volumes (PVs) at the influent dissolved oxygen of 0.68∼2.45 mg/L and pH of 6.76∼7.42. NH4 +–N of 4.06∼10.49 mg/L was depleted and NO x –N (i.e., NO3 –N + NO2 –N) of 4.26∼9.63 mg/L was formed before 98 PVs in the ORC zone. NH4 +–N of ≤4.76 mg/L was eliminated in the clinoptilolite zone. NO x –N of 10.44∼12.80 mg/L was lost before 21 PVs in the spongy iron zone. The clinoptilolite zone length should be reduced to 30 cm. Microbial nitrification played a dominant role in NH4 +–N removal in the ORC zone. Ion exchange was majorly responsible for NH4 +–N elimination in the clinoptilolite zone. Chemical reduction and hydrogenotrophic denitrification both contributed to NO x –N transformation, but the chemical reduction capacity decreased after 21 PVs in the spongy iron.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choe SH, Ljestrand HM, Khim J (2004) Nitrate reduction by zero-valent iron under different pH regimes. Appl Geochem 19:335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang HP, Ohashi A, Imachi H, Tandukar M, Harada H (2007) Effective partial nitrification to nitrite by down-flow hanging sponge reactor under limited oxygen condition. Water Res 41:295–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels L, Belay N, Rajagopal BS, Weimer PJ (1987) Bacterial methanogenesis and growth from CO2 with elemental iron as the sole source of electrons. Science 237:509–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meric S (2006) An heterotrophic/autotrophic denitrification (HAD) approach for nitrate removal from drinking water. Process Biochem 41:1022–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meriç S (2007) Overview of in-situ applicable nitrate removal processes. Desalination 204:46–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Q, Liu S, Cao Z, Wang Y (2005) Ammonia removal from aqueous solution using natural Chinese clinoptilolite. Sep Purif Technol 44:229–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ergas S, Reuss AF (2001) Hydrogenotrophic denitrification of drinking water using a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. J Water Supp Res Technol AQUA 50:161–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert O, Pomierny S, Rowe I, Kalin RM (2008) Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). Bioresour Technol 99:7587–7596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert O, de Pablo J, Cortina JL, Ayora C (2010) In situ removal of arsenic from groundwater by using permeable reactive barriers of organic matter/limestone/zero-valent iron mixtures. Environ Geochem Health 32:373–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez MA, Hontoria E, González-López J (2002) Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrifying submerged filter. J Hazard Mater 90:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu B, Watson DB, Wu L, Phillips DH, White DC, Zhou J (2002) Microbiological characteristics in a zero-valent iron reactive barrier. Environ Monit Assess 77:293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF, Horner S, McGovern T, Davey B (2002) An application of permeable reactive barrier technology to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater. Water Res 36:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim MA, Mukhopadhyay S, Sahu JN, Sengupta B (2011) Remediation technologies for heavy metal contaminated groundwater. J Environ Manag 92:2355–2388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Fallowfield H, Guan H, Liu F (2012) Remediation of nitrate-nitrogen contaminated groundwater by a heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification (HAD) approach in an aerobic environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(7):4029–4038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav O, Green M (2000) Bioregenerated ion-exchange process: the effect of the biofilm on the ion-exchange capacity and kinetics. Water SA 26(1):51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Rittmann BE (2002) Applying a novel autohydrogenotrophic hollow-fiber membrane biofilm reactor for denitrification of drinking water. Water Res 36:2040–2052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Moon CH, Kim JH, Oh BT (2007) Feasibility study of the bio-barrier with biologically-active tire rubbers for treating chlorinated hydrocarbons. Geosci J 11(2):131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Huang G, Fallowfield H, Guan H, Zhu L, Hu H (2014) Study on heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification permeable reactive barriers (HAD PRBs) for groundwater in situ remediation. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, Germany

  • Manning DAC, Hutcheon IE (2004) Distribution and mineralogical controls on ammonium in deep groundwaters. Appl Geochem 19:1495–1503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DN, Smith RL (2009) Microbial characterization of nitrification in a shallow, nitrogen contaminated aquifer, Cape Cod, Massachusetts and detection of a novel cluster associated with nitrifying Betaproteobacteria. J Contam Hydrol 103:182–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Njoroge BNK, Mwamachi SG (2004) Ammonia removal from an aqueous solution by the use of a natural zeolite. J Environ Eng Sci 3:147–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park JB, Lee SH, Lee JW, Lee CY (2002) Lab scale experiments for permeable reactive barriers against contaminated groundwater with ammonium and heavy metals using clinoptilolite (01-29B). J Hazard Mater B95:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BM, Grassi ME, Davis GB, Robertson BS, Mckinley AJ (2002) Use of polymer mats in series for sequential reactive barrier remediation of ammonium-contaminated groundwater: laboratory column evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 36:3439–3445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BM, Grassi ME, Robertson BS, Davis GB, Smith AJ, Mckinley AJ (2004) Use of polymer mats in series for sequential reactive barrier remediation of ammonium-contaminated groundwater: field evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 38:6846–6854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perego C, Bagatin R, Tagliabue M, Vignola R (2013) Zeolites and related mesoporous materials for multi-talented environmental solutions. Micro Mesop Mater 166:37–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qambrani NA, Jung SH, Ok YS, Kim YS, Oh SE (2013) Nitrate-contaminated groundwater remediation by combined autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification for sulfate and pH control: batch tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:9084–9091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Barkle GF, Vojvodic-Vukovic M (2005) Maximum rates of nitrate removal in a denitrification wall. J Environ Qual 34:1270–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL, Miller DN, Brooks MH, Widdowson MA, Killingstad MW (2001) In situ stimulation of groundwater denitrification with formate to remediate nitrate contamination. Environ Sci Technol 35:196–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MIM (2000) Biological denitrification of groundwater. Water Air Soil Pollut 123:183–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Puls RW (2007) Removal of added nitrate in cotton burr compost, mulch compost, and peat: mechanisms and potential use for groundwater nitrate remediation. Chemosphere 66:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruvenkatachari R, Vigneswaran S, Naidu R (2008) Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation. J Ind Eng Chem 14:145–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Till BA, Weathers LJ, Alvarez PJJ (1998) Fe(0)-supported autotrophic denitrification. Environ Sci Technol 32:634–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YJ, Chou FC, Cheng TC (2009) Coupled acidification and ultrasound with iron enhances nitrate reduction. J Hazard Mater 163:743–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Nooten T, Diels L, Bastiaens L (2008) Design of a multifunctional permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of landfill leachate contamination: laboratory column evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 42:8890–8895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nooten T, Diels L, Bastiaens L (2010) Microbially mediated clinoptilolite regeneration in a multifunctional permeable reactive barrier used to remove ammonium from landfill leachate contamination: laboratory column evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 44:3486–3492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Nooten T, Diels L, Bastiaens L (2011) A laboratory-scale mixed multibarrier for removal of ammonium from landfill leachate contamination. Int J Environ Eng 3(3/4):240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen D, Ho YS, Tang X (2006) Comparative sorption kinetic studies of ammonium onto zeolite. J Hazard Mater B133:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P, James J (2003) Nitrate removal in zero-valent iron packed columns. Water Res 37:1818–1830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh CH, Lin CW, Wu CH (2010) A permeable reactive barrier for the bioremediation of BTEX-contaminated groundwater: microbial community distribution and removal efficiencies. J Hazard Mater 178:74–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li Y, Li J, Sheng G, Zhang Y, Zheng X (2012) Enhanced Cr(VI) removal by using the mixture of pillared bentonite and zero-valent iron. Chem Eng J 185–186:243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, Wu M, Xing M, Yang J, Gao N, Pan M (2014) Impacts of temperature and nitrifying community on nitrification kinetics in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating polluted raw water. Chem Eng J 236:242–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported jointly by the project from the China Geological Survey (1212011121171), National Program of Control and Treatment of Water Pollution (2009ZX07424-002-002), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M541111), and Beijing Excellent Talents Program (2012D001055000001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Liu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Angeles Blanco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, G., Liu, F., Yang, Y. et al. Ammonium-nitrogen-contaminated groundwater remediation by a sequential three-zone permeable reactive barrier (multibarrier) with oxygen-releasing compound (ORC)/clinoptilolite/spongy iron: column studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 3705–3714 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3602-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3602-4

Keywords

Navigation