Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical approach for arsenic adsorption onto Turkey clinoptilolite

  • Environmental Science and Pollution Sensing, Monitoring, Modeling and Remediation
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the optimization of arsenic adsorption onto natural clinoptilolite (NC-Na). Response surface methodology in combination with Box–Behnken design was used to optimize the parameters of the adsorption process. Solution pH, temperature, and initial arsenic concentration were chosen as the main process variables, and the amount of arsenic adsorbed was selected as the investigated response. The analysis of variance results of the response surface model for arsenate (As(V)) adsorption on NC-Na showed that the effects and the interactions of pH and temperature were highly significant according to the p values (p < 0.05). The optimum conditions were found to be the solution pH of 5.0, temperature of 45 °C, and initial concentration of 7.8 mg L−1. The response surfaces derived from the models revealed that solution pH and temperature showed the greatest effect on the As(V) adsorption capacity of natural clinoptilolite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksu Z, Gönen F (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39:599–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Altaş L, Işık M, Kavurmacı M (2011) Determination of arsenic levels in the water resources of Aksaray Province, Turkey. J Environ Manage 92:2182–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RL (1987) Practical statistics for analytical chemists. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Avcı Tuna AÖ, Özdemir E, Bilgin Simsek E, Beker U (2013) Optimization of process parameters for removal of arsenic using activated carbon-based iron-containing adsorbents by response surface methodology. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin Simsek E, Özdemir E, Beker U (2013) Zeolite supported mono- and bimetallic oxides: promising adsorbents for removal of As(V) in aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 220:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilici Baskan M, Pala A (2010) A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate. Desalination 254:42–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilici Baskan M, Pala A (2011) Removal of arsenic from drinking water using modified natural zeolite. Desalination 281:396–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chutia P, Kato S, Kojima T, Satokawa S (2009a) Adsorption of As(V) on surfactant modified natural zeolites. J Hazard Mater 162:204–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chutia P, Kato S, Kojima T, Satokawa S (2009b) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution on synthetic zeolites. J Hazard Mater 162:440–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dávila-Jiménez MM, Elizalde-González MP, Mattusch J, Morgenstern P, Pérez-Cruz MA, Reyes-Ortega et al (2008) In situ and ex situ study of the enhanced modification with iron of clinoptilolite-rich zeolitic tuff for arsenic sorption from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 322:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue MD, Aranovich GL (1998) Adsorption hysteresis in porous solids. J Colloid Interface Sci 205:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doula MK, Ioannou A (2003) The effect of electrolyte anion on cu adsorption–desorption by clinoptilolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 58:115–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elizalde-Gonzalez MP, Mattusch J, Wennrich R, Morgenstern P (2001) Uptake of arsenite and arsenat by clinoptiolite-rich tuffs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 46:277–286

  • Gunduz O, Simsek C, Hasozbek A (2010) Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav plain, Turkey: its impact on water quality and human health. Water Air Soil Pol 205:43–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henke KR (2009a) Introduction. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic: environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 1–5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henke KR (2009b) Arsenic in natural environments. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 69–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes MF, Thomas DJ, Kenyon EM (2009) Toxicology and epidemiology of arsenic and its compounds. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon CS, Baek K, Park JK, Oh YK, Lee SD (2009) Adsorption characteristics of As(V) on iron-coated zeolite. J Hazard Mater 163:804–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Cedillo MJ, Olguín MT, Fall C, Colin A (2011) Adsorption capacity of iron or iron–manganese-modified zeolite-rich tuffs for As(III) and As(V) water pollutants. Appl Clay Sci 54:206–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lercher JA, Jentys A (2007) Infared and Raman spectroscopy for characterizing zeolites. In: Cejka J, Bekkum HV, Corma A, Schüth F (ed) Introduction to zeolite science and practice, 3rd revised edition. Elsevier BV, pp 435–470

  • Li Z, Beachner R, McManama Z, Hanlie H (2007) Sorption of arsenic by surfactant-modified zeolite and kaolinite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 105:291–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Jean JS, Jiang WT, Chang PH, Chen CJ (2011) Removal of arsenic from water using Fe-exchanged natural zeolite. J Hazard Mater 187:318–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo-Miranda MG, Olguin MT (2007) Arsenic sorption by modified clinoptilolite–heulandite rich tuffs. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 59:131–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin M, Yu G, Barberis E, Violante A, Kozak LM, Huang PM (2009) Impact of structural perturbation of aluminum hydroxides by tannate on arsenate adsorption. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1664–1675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2008) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. John Wiley & Sons, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom D and Archer D (2003) Arsenic thermodynamic data and environmental geochemistry: an evaluation of thermodynamic data for modeling the aqueous environmental geochemistry of arsenic. In: Welch AH, Stollenwerk KG (ed) Arsenic in ground water geochemistry and occurrence. Springer, pp 1–25

  • Othman Ali I, Hassan AM, Shaaban SM, Soliman KS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of ZSM-5 zeolite from rice husk ash and their adsorption of Pb2+ onto unmodified and surfactant-modified zeolite. Sep Purif Technol 83:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panpa W, Jinawath S (2009) Synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite and silicalite from rice husk ash. Appl Catal B 90:389–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Adsorption by powder & porous solids. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu JN, Acharya J, Meikapa BJ (2009) Response surface modeling and optimization of chromium(VI) removal from aqueous solution using Tamarind wood activated carbon in batch process. J Hazard Mater 172:818–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selene CH, Chou J, De Rosa CT (2003) Case studies—arsenic. Int J Hyg Environ Health 206:381–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shevade S, Ford RG (2004) Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res 38:3197–3204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi R, Jia Y, Wang C (2009) Competitive and cooperative adsorption of arsenate and citrate on goethite. J Environ Sci 21:106–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Somerset VS, Petrik LF, White RA, Klink MJ, Keyb D, Iwuoha E (2004) The use of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis in predicting the alkaline hydrothermal conversion of fly ash precipitates into zeolites. Talanta 64:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: sources, behavior and distribution. Sci Total Environ 366:701–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2001) United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, Geneva

  • World Health Organization (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol. 1 Recommendations

  • Xu Y, Nakajima T, Ohki T (2002) Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite. J Hazard Mater B92:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadanaparthi SKR, Graybill D, Wandruszka R (2009) Review: adsorbents for the removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from contaminated waters. J Hazard Mater 171:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yetilmezsoy K, Demirel S, Vanderbei RJ (2009) Response surface modeling of Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution by Pistacia vera L.: box–Behnken experimental design. J Hazard Mater 171:551–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Bilgin Simsek.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilgin Simsek, E., Avcı Tuna, A.O. & Beker, U. A statistical approach for arsenic adsorption onto Turkey clinoptilolite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 3249–3256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2975-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2975-8

Keywords

Navigation