Abstract
The present study investigated the optimization of arsenic adsorption onto natural clinoptilolite (NC-Na). Response surface methodology in combination with Box–Behnken design was used to optimize the parameters of the adsorption process. Solution pH, temperature, and initial arsenic concentration were chosen as the main process variables, and the amount of arsenic adsorbed was selected as the investigated response. The analysis of variance results of the response surface model for arsenate (As(V)) adsorption on NC-Na showed that the effects and the interactions of pH and temperature were highly significant according to the p values (p < 0.05). The optimum conditions were found to be the solution pH of 5.0, temperature of 45 °C, and initial concentration of 7.8 mg L−1. The response surfaces derived from the models revealed that solution pH and temperature showed the greatest effect on the As(V) adsorption capacity of natural clinoptilolite.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksu Z, Gönen F (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39:599–613
Altaş L, Işık M, Kavurmacı M (2011) Determination of arsenic levels in the water resources of Aksaray Province, Turkey. J Environ Manage 92:2182–2192
Anderson RL (1987) Practical statistics for analytical chemists. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Avcı Tuna AÖ, Özdemir E, Bilgin Simsek E, Beker U (2013) Optimization of process parameters for removal of arsenic using activated carbon-based iron-containing adsorbents by response surface methodology. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1685
Bilgin Simsek E, Özdemir E, Beker U (2013) Zeolite supported mono- and bimetallic oxides: promising adsorbents for removal of As(V) in aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 220:402–411
Bilici Baskan M, Pala A (2010) A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate. Desalination 254:42–48
Bilici Baskan M, Pala A (2011) Removal of arsenic from drinking water using modified natural zeolite. Desalination 281:396–403
Box GEP, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455–475
Chutia P, Kato S, Kojima T, Satokawa S (2009a) Adsorption of As(V) on surfactant modified natural zeolites. J Hazard Mater 162:204–211
Chutia P, Kato S, Kojima T, Satokawa S (2009b) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution on synthetic zeolites. J Hazard Mater 162:440–447
Dávila-Jiménez MM, Elizalde-González MP, Mattusch J, Morgenstern P, Pérez-Cruz MA, Reyes-Ortega et al (2008) In situ and ex situ study of the enhanced modification with iron of clinoptilolite-rich zeolitic tuff for arsenic sorption from aqueous solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 322:527–536
Donohue MD, Aranovich GL (1998) Adsorption hysteresis in porous solids. J Colloid Interface Sci 205:121–130
Doula MK, Ioannou A (2003) The effect of electrolyte anion on cu adsorption–desorption by clinoptilolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 58:115–130
Elizalde-Gonzalez MP, Mattusch J, Wennrich R, Morgenstern P (2001) Uptake of arsenite and arsenat by clinoptiolite-rich tuffs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 46:277–286
Gunduz O, Simsek C, Hasozbek A (2010) Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav plain, Turkey: its impact on water quality and human health. Water Air Soil Pol 205:43–62
Henke KR (2009a) Introduction. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic: environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 1–5
Henke KR (2009b) Arsenic in natural environments. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 69–235
Hughes MF, Thomas DJ, Kenyon EM (2009) Toxicology and epidemiology of arsenic and its compounds. In: Henke KR (ed) Arsenic environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment. Wiley, New York, pp 237–246
Jeon CS, Baek K, Park JK, Oh YK, Lee SD (2009) Adsorption characteristics of As(V) on iron-coated zeolite. J Hazard Mater 163:804–808
Jiménez-Cedillo MJ, Olguín MT, Fall C, Colin A (2011) Adsorption capacity of iron or iron–manganese-modified zeolite-rich tuffs for As(III) and As(V) water pollutants. Appl Clay Sci 54:206–216
Lercher JA, Jentys A (2007) Infared and Raman spectroscopy for characterizing zeolites. In: Cejka J, Bekkum HV, Corma A, Schüth F (ed) Introduction to zeolite science and practice, 3rd revised edition. Elsevier BV, pp 435–470
Li Z, Beachner R, McManama Z, Hanlie H (2007) Sorption of arsenic by surfactant-modified zeolite and kaolinite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 105:291–297
Li Z, Jean JS, Jiang WT, Chang PH, Chen CJ (2011) Removal of arsenic from water using Fe-exchanged natural zeolite. J Hazard Mater 187:318–323
Macedo-Miranda MG, Olguin MT (2007) Arsenic sorption by modified clinoptilolite–heulandite rich tuffs. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem 59:131–142
Martin M, Yu G, Barberis E, Violante A, Kozak LM, Huang PM (2009) Impact of structural perturbation of aluminum hydroxides by tannate on arsenate adsorption. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1664–1675
Montgomery DC (2008) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. John Wiley & Sons, USA
Nordstrom D and Archer D (2003) Arsenic thermodynamic data and environmental geochemistry: an evaluation of thermodynamic data for modeling the aqueous environmental geochemistry of arsenic. In: Welch AH, Stollenwerk KG (ed) Arsenic in ground water geochemistry and occurrence. Springer, pp 1–25
Othman Ali I, Hassan AM, Shaaban SM, Soliman KS (2011) Synthesis and characterization of ZSM-5 zeolite from rice husk ash and their adsorption of Pb2+ onto unmodified and surfactant-modified zeolite. Sep Purif Technol 83:38–44
Panpa W, Jinawath S (2009) Synthesis of ZSM-5 zeolite and silicalite from rice husk ash. Appl Catal B 90:389–394
Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K (1999) Adsorption by powder & porous solids. Academic Press, San Diego
Sahu JN, Acharya J, Meikapa BJ (2009) Response surface modeling and optimization of chromium(VI) removal from aqueous solution using Tamarind wood activated carbon in batch process. J Hazard Mater 172:818–825
Selene CH, Chou J, De Rosa CT (2003) Case studies—arsenic. Int J Hyg Environ Health 206:381–386
Shevade S, Ford RG (2004) Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res 38:3197–3204
Shi R, Jia Y, Wang C (2009) Competitive and cooperative adsorption of arsenate and citrate on goethite. J Environ Sci 21:106–112
Somerset VS, Petrik LF, White RA, Klink MJ, Keyb D, Iwuoha E (2004) The use of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis in predicting the alkaline hydrothermal conversion of fly ash precipitates into zeolites. Talanta 64:109–114
Wang S, Mulligan CN (2006) Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: sources, behavior and distribution. Sci Total Environ 366:701–721
World Health Organization (2001) United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, Geneva
World Health Organization (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol. 1 Recommendations
Xu Y, Nakajima T, Ohki T (2002) Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite. J Hazard Mater B92:275–287
Yadanaparthi SKR, Graybill D, Wandruszka R (2009) Review: adsorbents for the removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from contaminated waters. J Hazard Mater 171:1–15
Yetilmezsoy K, Demirel S, Vanderbei RJ (2009) Response surface modeling of Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution by Pistacia vera L.: box–Behnken experimental design. J Hazard Mater 171:551–562
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bilgin Simsek, E., Avcı Tuna, A.O. & Beker, U. A statistical approach for arsenic adsorption onto Turkey clinoptilolite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 3249–3256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2975-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2975-8