Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Forest Perception and Knowledge of Hikers and Mountain Bikers in Two Different Areas in Northwestern Switzerland

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recreational activities can have major impacts on vegetation and wildlife in frequently visited forests. We assessed forest perception and knowledge (state, functions, and species diversity) among hikers and mountain bikers in a frequently visited, seminatural suburban recreation forest (Muttenz) and in a more distantly situated, naturally grown excursion forest (Wasserfallen) in northwestern Switzerland. In all, 239 hikers and 126 mountain bikers were interviewed. Mountain bikers in both forests and hikers in the more intensely used recreation forest at Muttenz assessed the state of the forest less optimistically and showed a higher awareness of the negative impact of recreational activities on the flora and fauna than hikers at Wasserfallen. Furthermore, mountain bikers seemed aware of the social conflicts caused by their activity, since they appreciated neutral or positive encounters with other forest visitors. In contrast, 57% of hikers at Muttenz reported on negative experiences with other forest visitors, particularly with mountain bikers. In general, the interviewees’ ecological and biological forest knowledge (forest type and function, species diversity) was rather high. A large proportion was aware of the pros and cons of different forest conditions for plants and animals, and could name or recognize at least some plant and/or animal species typical for the visited forest. The forest knowledge was neither influenced by the type of recreational activity carried out nor by any aspect of forest visit behavior (frequency and duration of forest visits, means of transportation and travel distance to forest). However, the interviewees’ forest knowledge was influenced by their age and educational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baudepartement Kanton Aargau and Landratsamt Waldshut (eds). 1999. Rheinlandschaft: Eine gemeinsame Strategie für Natur, Landschaft und Erholung. Teilbericht Besucherbefragung im Perimeter., 83 pp

  • Baur, B. (ed.). 1999. Der Allschwiler Wald. Allschwiler Schriften zur Geschichte, Kultur und Wirtschaft. Band 11. Verkehrs- und Kulturverein, Allschwil, 154 pp

  • M. W. Brunson D. K. Reiter (1996) ArticleTitleEffects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest. Journal of Environmental Management 46 31–41 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jema.1996.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. L. Bultena D. Field P. Womble D. Albrecht (1981) ArticleTitleClosing the gates: a study of backcountry use limitation at Mount McKinley National Park. Leisure Sciences 4 249–267

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Burnand B. Hasspacher (1999) Waldstandorte beider Basel: Kommentar zur vegetationskundlichen Standortskartierung der Wälder Verlag des Kantons Basel-Landschaft Liestal

    Google Scholar 

  • BUWAL (ed.). 1999. Gesellschaftliche Ansprüche an den Schweizer Wald-Meinungsumfrage. Schriftenreihe Umwelt, No. 309, 152 pp

  • R. B. Ditton A. J. Fedler A. R. Graefe (1983) ArticleTitleFactors contributing to perceptions of recreation crowding. Leisure Sciences 5 273–286

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Fröhlich H. Klingelhöfer (1977) ArticleTitleErgebnisse forstlicher Öffentlichkeitsarbeit und Folgerungen aus einer Meinungsumfrage in Hessen. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 32 487–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, G. 1994. Aktivitäten der städtischen Forstverwaltung Liestal in der Wahrnehmung von Waldbesucherinnen und Waldbesuchern. Diplomarbeit, Professur für Forstpolitik und Forstökonomie, ETH Zürich, Arbeitsberichte Allgemeine Reihe, No. 97/1, 76 pp

  • C. Heer H. P. Rusterholz B. Baur (2003) ArticleTitleAkzeptanz von Pflegemassnahmen im eines stadtnahen Erholungswald Wald und Holz 2 36–39

    Google Scholar 

  • H. P. Hertig (1979) ArticleTitleDie Einstellung der Bevölkerung zu Problemen des Waldes und der Waldwirtschaft. Ergebnisse einer Meinungsumfrage. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 130 591–611

    Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Hoger D. J. Chavez (1998) ArticleTitleConflict and management tactics on the trail. Parks and Recreation 33 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hunziker (1997) ArticleTitleTotholz in den Nationalparkwäldern: Attraktion oder Störfaktor? Ergebnisse einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Studie. Cratschla 2 2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Jacsman (1998) ArticleTitleKonsequenzen der intensiven Erholungsnutzung für die Wälder im städtischen Raum. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 149 423–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, O. 2001. Valuation of recreational benefits and visitor conflicts in an urban forest. Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE), Moscow, Russia, 15 pp.

  • C. C. Konijnendijk (2000) ArticleTitleAdapting forestry to urban demands—role of communication in urban forestry in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planing 52 89–100 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00125-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht, M., Stamm, H. 1994. Die soziale Ordnung der Freizeit: Soziale Unterschiede im Freizeitverhalten der Schweizer Wohnbevölkerung. Seismo, Zürich, 564 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lindhagen L. Hörnsten (2000) ArticleTitleForest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: Changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 73 143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • S. R. Martin S. F. McCool R. C. Lucas (1989) ArticleTitleWilderness campsite impacts: do managers and visitors see them the same? Environmental Management 13 623–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. L. 1994. Conflicts on multiple-use trails: synthesis of the literature and state of the practice. The Federal Highway Administration and the National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, 68 pp.

  • K. Papageorgiou (2001) ArticleTitleA combined park management framework based on regulatory and behavioral strategies: uses of visitors’ knowledge to assess effectiveness. Environmental Management 28 61–73 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fhslahuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11437001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R. Ramthun (1995) ArticleTitleFactors in user group conflict between hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences 17 159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Rozsnyay (1979) ArticleTitleZum Mischwaldbegriff der Waldbesucher und ihre Ansichten über die Schichtigkeit der Bestände-Ergebnisse einer Meinungsumfrage in Königsforst bei Köln. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 98 222–233

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Schmithüsen S. Wild-Eck (2000) ArticleTitleUses and perceptions of forests by people living in urban areas-findings from selected empirical studies. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 119 395–408

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Symmonds W. E. Hammitt (2000) ArticleTitleManaging recreational trail environments for mountain bike user preferences. Environmental Management 25 549–564 Occurrence Handle10742481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • L. Tahvanainen L. Tyrväinen M. Ihalainen N. Vuorela O. Kolehmainen (2001) ArticleTitleForest management and public perceptions—visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planing 53 53–70 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00137-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Volk (1992) ArticleTitleNeue Entwicklungen bei der Walderholung in Südwestdeutschland. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 111 282–292

    Google Scholar 

  • P. C. West (1982) ArticleTitleEffects of user behaviour on the perception of crowding in backcountry forest recreation. Forest Science 28 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Womble D. Johnson G. Bultena D. Field (1980) The response of hikers to seeing resource impacts in the backcountry. Final report submitted to USDI National Park Service, in cooperation with the Cooperative Park Studies Unit, College of Forest Resources University of Washington Seattle

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant of the MGU (Mensch-Gesellschaft-Umwelt) foundation of Basel University. We thank Georg Armbruster, William E. Hammitt, Samuel Zschokke, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Integrative Biology, Section of Conservation Biology, University of Basel, St. Johanns-Vorstadt 10, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland

    Claudia Heer, Hans-Peter Rusterholz & Bruno Baur

Authors
  1. Claudia Heer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Peter Rusterholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruno Baur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Baur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heer, C., Rusterholz, HP. & Baur, B. Forest Perception and Knowledge of Hikers and Mountain Bikers in Two Different Areas in Northwestern Switzerland . Environmental Management 31, 709–723 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-3002-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation