Skip to main content
Log in

Application of integrated methods in mapping waste disposal areas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

An integrated suite of environmental methods was used to characterize the hydrogeological, geological and tectonic regime of the largest waste disposal landfill of Crete Island, the Fodele municipal solid waste site (MSW), to determine the geometry of the landfill (depth and spatial extent of electrically conductive anomalies), to define the anisotropy caused by bedrock fabric fractures and to locate potential zones of electrically conductive contamination. A combination of geophysical methods and chemical analysis was implemented for the characterization and management of the landfill. Five different types of geophysical surveys were performed: (1) 2D electrical resistance tomography (ERT), (2) electromagnetic measurements using very low frequencies (VLF), (3) electromagnetic conductivity (EM31), (4) seismic refraction measurements (SR), and (5) ambient noise measurements (HVSR). The above geophysical methods were used with the aim of studying the subsurface properties of the landfill and to define the exact geometrical characteristics of the site under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acworth RI (1999) Investigation of dryland salinity using the electrical image method. Aust J Soil Res 37(4):623–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos A, Koukis G, Sabatakakis N, Tsiambaos G (2003) Empirical correlations of soil parameters based on cone penetration tests (CPT) for Greek soils. Geotech Geol Eng 21:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atekwana EA, Sauck WA, Werkema Jr DD (2000) Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site. J Appl Geophys 44:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augello AJ, Bray JD, Abrahamson NA, Seed RB (1998) Dynamic properties of solid waste based on back-analysis of OII landfill. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(3):211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson RR, Glaccum A, Noel MR (1988) Geophysical techniques for sensing buried wastes and waste migration. National water well association, Dublin, OH, 236 pp

  • Bernstone C, Dahlin T, Ohlsson T, Hogland W (2000) DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structures: two pre-excavation surveys. Environ Geol 39:3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick S, Ghosh N, Wadhwa RS (1996) Seismic refraction modelling and the importance of SH-waves for landfill site investigations. Environ Eng Geosci 2(2):262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter PJ, Calkin SF, Kaufmann RS (1991) Assessing a fractured landfill cover using electrical resistivity and seismic refraction techniques. Geophysics 56(11):1896–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado J, Lopez Casado C, Estevez A, Giner J, Guenca A, Molina S (2000a) Mapping soft soils in the Segura river valley (SE Spain): a case study of microtremors as an exploration tool. J Appl Geophys 45:19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado J, Lopez Casado C, Giner J, Estevez A, Cuenca A, Molina S (2000b) Microtremors as a geophysical exploration tool:applications and limitations. Pure Appl Geophys 157:1445–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado J, Alfaro P, Galindo-Zaldivar J, Jabaloy A, Lopez Garrido AC, Sanz De Galdeano C (2002) Structure of the Padul-Niguelas Basin (S Spain) from H/V ratios of ambient noise: application of the method to study peat and coarse sediments. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2733–2749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett JD (1989). Hydrogeologic assessment, design and remediation of a shallow groundwater contaminated zone. In: Proceedings of the 3rd national outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods. National Water Well Association, Orlando, pp 591–605

  • Fraser DC (1969) Contouring of VLF-EM data: Geophysics 34:958–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths D, Barker R (1993) Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211.226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall DW, Pasicznyk DL (1987) Application of seismic refraction and terrain conductivity methods at a ground water pollution site in North-Central New Jersey. In: The 1st national outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods

  • Hutchinson PJ (1995) The geology of landfills. Environl Geosci 2(1):2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson PJ, Barta LS (2000) Geophysical applications to solid waste analysis. In: Zandi I, Mersky RL, Shieh WK (eds) The 16th international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, PA, USA, December 10–13, 2000, pp 2–68 to 2–78, ISSN 1091–8043

  • Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Vassiliou A (1992a) Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of Greek soil formations. In: The 2nd Greek national conference on geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, October 21–23, vol 2, pp 239–246

  • Kalteziotis N, M. Pachakis C, Zervogiannis G, Tsiambaos, Sabatakakis N (1992b) Prediction of soil dynamic parameters from in situ tests. In: The 2nd Greek national conference on geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, October 21–23, vol 1, pp 189–196

  • Karlık G, Kaya A (2001) Investigation of groundwater contamination using electric and electromagnetic methods at an open waste-disposal site: a case study from Isparta, Turkey Environ Geol 40(6):34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Karous M, Hjelt SE (1983) Linear filtering of VLF dip angle measurements. Geophys Prospect 31:782–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavazanjian E Jr, Matasovic N (1995) Seismic analysis of solid waste landfills. In: The geoenvironment 2000 speciality conference, ASCE, 2:1066–1080, New Orleans, Louisiana, 24–26 February, 1995

  • Kavazanjian E Jr, Matasovic N, Stokoe K, Bray JD (1996) In situ shear wave velocity of solid waste from surface wave measurements. In: The 2nd international congress environmental geotechnics, Osaka, Japan. Balkema, vol 1, pp 97–104

  • Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor, Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):228–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanz E, Jemmi L, Muller R, Green A, Pugin A, Huggenberger P (1994) Integrated studies of Swiss waste disposal sites: results from georadar and other geophysical surveys. In: The 5th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR ‘94). Kitchener, Ontario, pp 1261–1274

  • Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Overburden correction factors for spt in sand. J Geotech Eng, A.S.C.E., 112(3):373–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1995) Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections, Geophysics 60:1682–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996a) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH, Barker RD (1996b) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophys Prospect 44:499–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loke MH (1997) Rapid 2D resistivity inversion using the least-squares method, RES2DINV Program manual, Penang, Malaysia

  • Loke MH (1999) Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: a practical guide to 2D and 3D surveys. 5, Cangkat Minden Lorong 6, Minden Heights, 11700 Penang, Malaysia (mhoke@pc.jaring.my). Downloaded from http://www.abem.se

  • Lontzetidis K, Raptakis D, Pitilakis K (1997) Correlation between V s -N(SPT) in Greek soils. In: The 3rd P.S.G.M, Patra, I, pp 419–425 (in Greek)

  • Mack TJ, Maus PE (1986) Detection of contaminant plumes in ground water of Long Island, New York, by electromagnetic terrain-conductivity surveys. USGS. Water resources investigations. 86–4045. 39 pp

  • Matasovic N, Kavazanjian E Jr (1998) Cyclic Characterization of OII Landfill Solid Waste. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(3):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill JD (1980) Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Geonics, Technical Note TN-6

  • McNeill JD (1990) Use of electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies. In: Ward SN (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics: I. Review and tutorial. Society of exploration geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, pp 191–218

  • McQuown MS, Becker SR, Miller PT (1991) Subsurface characterization of a landfill using integrated geophysical techniques. In: The 5th national outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods, May 13–16, 1991. Water Well Journal Publishing Co., Las Vegas, NV, pp. 933–946

  • Medlin E, Knuth M (1986) Monitoring the effects of a ground water recovery system with EM. In: Graves BJ, Lehr JH, Butcher K, Owen TE, Mathews M (eds) The surface and borehole geophysical methods and ground water instrumentation conference and exposition. National Water Well Association, Denver, CO, pp 368–378

  • Olhoeft GR (1986) Direct detection of hydrocarbon and organic chemicals with ground penetrating radar and complex resistivity. In: The NWWA/API conference on petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water—prevention, detection and restoration. National Water Well Association, Dublin OH, Houston, TX, pp. 284–305

  • Olhoeft GR, King TVV (1991) Mapping subsurface organic compounds noninvasively by their reactions with clays. In: The 4th toxic substances technical meeting. Monterey, CA, pp 1–18

  • Orlando L, Marchesi E (2001) Georadar as a tool to identify and characterise solid waste dump deposits. J Appl Geophys 48:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parolai S, Borman P, Milkreit C (2001) Assessment of the natural frequency of the sedimentary cover in the cologne area (Germany) using noise measurements. J Earthq Eng 5(4):541–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parolai S, Bormann P, Milkereit C (2002) New Relationships between Vs, Thickness of Sediments and Resonance Frequency Calculated by H/V Ratio of Seismic Noise for Cologne Area (Germany). Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(6):2521–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsani JL, Filhob WM, Vagner RE, Shimelesa F, Douradob JC, Moura HP (2004) The use of GPR and VES in delineating a contamination plume in a landfill site: a case study in SE Brazil. J Appl Geophys 55:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers CJ, Wilson J, Haeni FP, Johnson CD (1999) Surface-geophysical investigation of the University Of Connecticut Landfill, Storrs, Connecticut, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4211, U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey with the University of Connecticut

  • Rimrock Geophysics (1995) SIP SHELL: A software for interpretation of refraction seismics, Rimrock Geophysics Inc., USA

  • Rumbaugh JO III, Caldwell JA, Shaw ST (1987) A geophysical ground water monitoring program for a sanitary landfill: Implementation and preliminary analysis. In: Graves BJ, Lehr H, Butcher K, Alcorn P, Ammerman L, Williams P, Renz M, Shelton V (eds) The 1st national outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods. National Water Well Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 623–641

  • Russell GM (1990) Application of geophysical techniques for assessing groundwater contamination near a landfill at Stuart, Florida. In: The FOCUS conference on eastern regional ground water issues. NWWA, Springfield, Mass. 2–77, pp 211–225

  • Sasaki Y (1989) 2-D joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole–dipole resistivity data. Geophysics 54:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki Y (1992) Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophys Prospect 40:453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauck WA (2000) A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments. J ApplGeophys 44:151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders WR, Cox SA (1987) Use of an electromagnetic induction technique in subsurface hydrocarbon investigations. In: Graves B, Lehr JH, Butcher K, Alcorn P, Ammerman L, Williams P, Renz M Shelton V (eds) The 1st national outdoor action conference on aquifer restoration, ground water monitoring and geophysical methods. National Water Well Association, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp 585–601

  • Scaife JE (1990) Using geophysical techniques in environmental site assessments. Municipal Ind Water Pollut Control 128(4):4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Seht, Malte Ibs-von, Jurgen Wohlenberg (1999) Microtremor measurements used to map thickness of soft sediments. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(1):250–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, aging and over consolidation. Geotechnique 36(3):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton GP, Schrader TP (2001) Surface geophysical investigation of a chemical waste landfill in northwestern arkansas, U.S. Geological Survey, 401 Hardin Road, Little Rock, AR 72211. In: Kuniansky EL (ed) 2001, US Geological Survey Karst Interest Group Proceedings, Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4011, pp 107–115

  • Stenson RW (1988) Electromagnetic data acquisition techniques for landfill investigations. In: The symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering problems. The Society of Engineering and Mineral Exploration Geophysics, Golden, CO, pp 735–746

  • Tsourlos P (1995) Modelling interpretation and inversion of multi-electrode resistivity survey data: D.Phil. Thesis, University of York

  • Ulrych TJ, Lima OAL, Sampaio EES (1994) In search of plumes: a GPR odyssey in Brazil. In: The 64th annual international met. society exploration geophysical SEG, Los Angeles, USA, 569–572

  • Walther EG, Pitchford AM, Olhoeft GR (1986) A strategy for detecting subsurface organic contaminants. In: The petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water, prevention, detection and restoration. National Water Well Association, Houston, TX, pp 357–381

  • Zekkos DP (2005) Evaluation of static and dynamic properties of municipal solid-waste, PhD Thesis, department of civil and environmental engineering, University of California at Berkeley. Also available at http://www.geoengineer.org

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project is co-funded by the European Social Fund and National Resources in the framework of the project Archimedes: “Support of Research Teams of Technological Educational Institute of Crete”, sub-project 2.6.6–MIS86455 entitled “Application of innovative techniques in landfills”. We would also like to thank the Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Seismology-ITSAK (N. Theodoulidis and A. Savvaidis) for providing the CityShark Microtremor system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pantelis Soupios.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soupios, P., Papadopoulos, N., Papadopoulos, I. et al. Application of integrated methods in mapping waste disposal areas. Environ Geol 53, 661–675 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0681-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0681-2

Keywords

Navigation