Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bivariate frequency analysis of low flow using copula functions (case study: Dez River Basin, Iran)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate estimation of low flow as a criterion for different objectives in water resource management, including drought is of crucial importance. Despite the complex nature of water deficits, univariate methods have often been used to analyze the frequency of low flows. In this study, low flows of Dez River basin were examined during period of 1956–2012 using copula functions at the upstream of headbranches’ junction. For this purpose, at first 7-day series of low flow was extracted at the studied stations, then their homogeneity was examined by Mann–Kendall test. The results indicated that 7-day low flow series of Dez basin were homogenous. In the next stage, 12 different distribution functions were fitted onto the low flow data. Finally, for Sepid Dasht Sezar (SDS), Sepid Dasht Zaz (SDZ), and Tang Panj Bakhtiyari (TPB) stations, logistic distribution had the best fit, while for Tang Panj Sezar (TPS) station, GEV distribution enjoyed the best fit. After specifying the best fitted marginal distributions, seven different copula functions including Ali–Mikhail–Haq (AMH), Frank, Clayton, Galambos, Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern (FGM), Gumbel–Hougaard (GH), and Plackett were used for bivariate frequency analysis of the 7-day low flow series. The results revealed that the GH copula had the best fitness on paired data of SDS and SDZ stations. For TPS and TPB stations, Frank copula has had the best correspondence with empirical copula values. Next, joint and conditional return periods were calculated for the low flow series at the upstream of branches’ junction. The results of this study indicated that the risk of incidence of severe drought is higher in upstream stations (SDZ and SDS) when compared with downstream stations (TPB and TPS) in Dez basin. Generally, application of multivariate analysis allows researchers to investigate hydrological events with a more comprehensive view by considering the simultaneous effect of the influencing factors on the phenomenon of interest. It also enables them to evaluate different combinations of required scenarios for integrated management of basin and planning to cope with the damages caused by natural phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi A, Hassanzadeh Y, Talatahari S, Fakheri-Fard A. Mirabbasi R (2017a) Parameter estimation of copula functions using an optimization-based method. Theor Appl Climatol 129(1–2):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1757-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdi A, Hassanzadeh Y, Talatahari S, Fakheri-Fard A. Mirabbasi R (2017b) Regional bivariate modeling of droughts using L-comoments and copulas. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 31(5):1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1222-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AghaKouchak A, Cheng L, Mazdiyasni O, Farahmand A (2014) Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophys Res Lett 41(24):8847–8852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi F, Nazeri Tahroudi M, Mirabbasi R, Khalili K, Jhajharia D (2017a) Spatiotemporal trend and abrupt change analysis of temperature in Iran. Meteorol Appl 25(2):314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi F, Radmaneh F, Parham GA, Mirabbasi R (2017b) Comparison of the performance of power law and probability distributions in the frequency analysis of flood in Dez Basin, Iran. Nat Hazards 87(3):1313–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender J, Wahl T, Müller A, Jensen J (2016) A multivariate design framework for river confluences. Hydrol Sci J 61(3):471–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles S, Heffernan J, Tawn J (1999) Dependence measures for extreme value analyses. Extremes 2(4):339–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Michele C, Salvadori G (2003) A generalized pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas. J Geophys Res 108(D2):4067. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Michele C, Salvadori G, Passoni G, Vezzoli R (2007) A multivariate model of sea storms using copulas. Coast Eng 54(10):734–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desa M, Rakhecha PR (2007) Probable maximum precipitation for 24-h duration over an equatorial region. Atmos Res 84(2):84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinpashoh Y, Mirabbasi R, Jhajharia D, Zare Abianeh H, Mostafaeipour A (2014) Effect of short term and long-term persistence on identification of temporal trends. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):617–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalante-Sandoval CA (2009) Mixed distribution in low flow frequency analysis. Ingeniería investigación y tecnología 10(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli P, Reddy MJ (2013) Probabilistic assessment of flood risks using trivariate copulas. Theor Appl Climatol 111(1–2):341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Z, AghaKouchak A (2013) Multivariate standardized drought index: a parametric multi-index model. Adv Water Resour 57:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim RR (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):1149–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1998) The effect of intersite dependence on regional flood frequency analysis. Water Resour Res 24(4):59–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman & Hall, London, 399 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380(1–2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili K, Tahoudi MN, Mirabbasi R, Ahmadi F (2016) Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation in Iran over the last half century. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 30(4):1205–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu GH, Yan GX, Wu ZY, Kang YX (2010) Regional drought analysis approach based on copula function. Adv Water Sci 2:007

    Google Scholar 

  • Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2014) Improved Bayesian multimodeling: Integration of copulas and Bayesian model averaging. Water Resour Res 50(12):9586–9603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabbasi R, Eslamian S (2010) Delineation of groundwater quality concerning applicability of pressure irrigation system in Sirjan watershed, Iran. International Conference on Management of Soil and Groundwater Salinization in Arid Regions, 11–14 January 2010, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman

  • Mirabbasi R, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Bivariate drought frequency analysis using the copula method. Theor Appl Climatol 108(1–2):191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabbasi R, Anagnostou EN, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y, Eslamian S (2013) Analysis of meteorological drought in northwest Iran using the Joint Deficit Index. J Hydrol 492:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modarres R (2008) Regional frequency distribution type of low flow in north of Iran by L-moments. Water Resour Manag 22:823–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23(5):881–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New York, 269p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouarda TBMJ, Shu C (2009) Regional low-flow frequency analysis using single and ensemble artificial neural networks. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad C, El Adlouni S, St-Hilaire A, Gachon P (2015) A nested multivariate copula approach to hydrometeorological simulations of spring floods: the case of the Richelieu River (Quebec, Canada) record flood. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 29(1):275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C (2006) Statistical characterization of temporal structure of storms. Adv Water Resour 29(6):827–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C (2007) On the use of copulas in hydrology: theory and practice. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C, Kottegoda NT, Rosso R (2007) Extremes in nature: an approach using Copulas. Springer, Netherlands, p 292

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo BC, Krajewski WF, Mishra KV (2015) Using the new dual-polarimetric capability of WSR-88D to eliminate anomalous propagation and wind turbine effects in radar-rainfall. Atmos Res 153(0):296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafaie M, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y, Mirabbasi R, De Michele C (2017) Modeling flood event characteristics using D-vine structures. Theor Appl Climatol 130(3–4):713–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1911-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi P, Chen X, Qu SM, Zhang ZC, Ma JL (2010) Regional frequency analysis of low flow based on L moments: case study in Karst area, Southwest China. J Hydrol Eng 15(5):370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de Repartition and Dimensions et LeursMarges. Publications de L’Institute de Statistique, Universite’ de Paris, Paris, vol 8, pp 229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3–4):147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RE, Bosch JM (1989) A description of the Westfalia catchment experiment to determine the effect on water yield of clearing the riparian zone and converting an indigenous forest to a eucalyptus plantation. S Afr For J 151(1):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivekanandan N (2014) Comparison of probability distributions for frequency analysis of annual maximum rainfall. Int J Res Innov Technol 1(3):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2016) A joint probability approach for coincidental flood frequency analysis at ungauged basin confluences. Nat Hazards J Int Soc Prevention Mitig Nat Hazards 82(3):1727–1741

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu KX, Xiong L, Gottschalk L (2014) Derivation of low flow distribution functions using copulas. J Hydrol 508:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Rasmussen P (2002) Bivariate frequency analysis: discussion of some useful concepts in hydrological application. Hydrol Process 16(14):2881–2898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Ouarda TBMJ, Bobee B (2001) A review of bivariate gamma distributions for hydrological application. J Hydrol 246:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani R, Mirabbasi R, Abdollahi S, Jhajharia D (2017) Streamflow trend analysis by considering autocorrelation structure, long-term persistence and Hurst coefficient in a semi-arid region of Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 129(1–2):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Singh VP (2006) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. J Hydrol Eng 11(2):150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Singh VP (2007) Gumbel–Hougaard copula for trivariate rainfall frequency analysis. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Chen YD, Chen X, Li J (2011) Copula-based analysis of hydrological extremes and implications of hydrological behaviors in the Pearl River basin, China. J Hydrol Eng 16(7):598–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Sharifi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, F., Radmaneh, F., Sharifi, M.R. et al. Bivariate frequency analysis of low flow using copula functions (case study: Dez River Basin, Iran). Environ Earth Sci 77, 643 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7819-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7819-2

Keywords

Navigation