Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Development Genes and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The insect leg and antenna are thought to be homologous structures, evolved from a common ancestral appendage. The homeotic transformations of antenna to leg in Drosophila produced by mutation of the Hox gene Antennapedia are position-specific, such that every particular antenna structure is transformed into a specific leg counterpart. This has been taken to suggest that the developmental programmes of these two appendages are still similar. In particular, the mechanisms for the specification of a cell's position within the appendage would be identical, only their interpretation would be different and subject to homeotic gene control. Here we explore the degree of conservation between the developmental programmes of leg and antenna in Drosophila and other dipterans, in wild-type and homeotic conditions. Most of the appendage pattern-forming genes are active in both appendages, and their expression domains are partially conserved. However, the regulatory relationships and interactions between these genes are different, and in fact cells change their expression while undergoing homeotic transformation. Thus, the positional information, and the mechanisms which generate it, are not strictly conserved between leg and antenna; and homeotic genes alter the establishment of positional clues, not only their interpretation. The partial conservation of pattern-forming genes in both appendages ensures a predictable re-specification of positional clues, producing the observed positional specificity of homeotic transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A, B. A
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5A–J. A, B

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouheif E, Akam M, Dickinson WJ, Holland PW, Meyer A, Patel NH, Raff RA, Roth VL, Wray GA (1997) Homology and developmental genes [letter]. Trends Genet 13:432–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Shaar M, Mann RS (1998) Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development. Development 125:3821–3830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abzhanov A, Kaufman TC (2000) Homologs of Drosophila appendage genes in the patterning of arthropod limbs. Dev Biol 227:673–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant PJ (1978) Pattern formation in imaginal discs. In Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol. 2c. Academic, London pp 230–335

  • Campbell GL, Weaver T, Tomlinson A (1993) Axis specification in the developing Drosophila appendage: the role of wingless decapentaplegic and the homeobox gene aristaless. Cell 74:1113–1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casares F, Mann RS (1998) Control of antenna versus leg development in Drosophila. Nature 392:723–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli-Gair J, Akam M (1995) How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metameres. Development 121:2973–2982

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen B, McGuffin ME, Pfeifle C, Segal D, Cohen SM (1992) apterous a gene required for imaginal disc development in Drosophila encodes a member of the LIM family of developmental regulatory proteins. Genes Dev 6:715–729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen SM, Bronner G, Kuttner F, Jurgens G, Jaeckle H (1989) Distal-less encodes a homoeodomain protein required for limb development in Drosophila. Nature 338:432–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Couso JP, Bishop SA (1998) Proximo-distal development in the legs of Drosophila. Int J Dev Biol 42:345–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Benjumea FJ, Cohen B, Cohen SM (1994) Cell interaction between compartments establishes the proximal-distal axis of Drosophila legs. Nature 372:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dong PD, Chu J, Panganiban G (2001) Proximodistal domain specification and interactions in developing Drosophila appendages. Development 128:2365–2372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo MI, Bishop SA, Greig S, Couso JP (2002) Leg patterning driven by proximal-distal interactions and EGFR signaling. Science 297:256–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gebelein B, Culi J, Ryoo HD, Zhang W, Mann RS (2002) Specificity of Distalless repression and limb primordia development by Abdominal Hox proteins. Dev Cell 3:487–498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godt D, Couderc JL, Cramton SE, Laski FA (1993) Pattern formation in the limbs of Drosophila: bric a brac is expressed in both a gradient and a wave-like pattern and is required for specification and proper segmentation of the tarsus. Development 119:799–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima T, Sato M, Saigo K (2000) Formation and specification of distal leg segments in Drosophila by dual Bar homeobox genes BarH1 and BarH2. Development 127:769–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen E, Lee T, Glickman N (1996) Antenna to leg transformation: dynamics of developmental competence. Dev Genet 19:333–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lecuit T, Cohen SM (1997) Proximal-distal axis formation in the Drosophila leg. Nature 388:139–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann RS, Chan SK (1996) Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet 12:258–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mardon G, Solomon NM, Rubin GM (1994) dachshund encodes a nuclear protein required for normal eye and leg development in Drosophila. Development 120:3473–3486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popadic A, Panganiban G, Rusch D, Shear WA, Kaufman TC (1998) Molecular evidence for the gnathobasic derivation of arthropod mandibles and for the appendicular origin of the labrum and other structures. Dev Genes Evol 208:142–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwait JH, Schneiderman HA (1971) Pattern formation and determination in the antenna of the homoeotic mutant Antennapedia of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 25:606–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prpic NM, Wigand B, Damen WG, Klingler M (2001) Expression of dachshund in wild-type and Distal-less mutant Tribolium corroborates serial homologies in insect appendages. Dev Genes Evol 211:467–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo JI, Galindo MI, Bishop SA, Couso JP (2000) Proximal-distal leg development in Drosophila requires the apterous gene and the Lim1 homologue dlim1. Development 127:5391–5402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scanga S, Manoukian A, Larsen E (1995) Time- and concentration-dependent response of the Drosophila antenna imaginal disc to Antennapedia. Dev Biol 169:673–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneuwly S, Klemenz R, Gehring WJ (1987) Redesigning the body plan of Drosophila by ectopic expression of the homoeotic gene Antennapedia. Nature 325:816–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struhl G (1981) A homoeotic mutation transforming leg to antenna in Drosophila. Nature 292:635–638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sunkel CE, Whittle JRS (1987) Brista: a gene involved in the specification and differentiation of distal cephalic and thoracic structures in Drosophila melanogaster. Roux Arch Dev Biol 196:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L (1981) Positional information and pattern formation. Phil Trans R Soc B 295:441–450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of our laboratory for discussions and unpublished observations. This work was financed by the Leverhulme Trust and The Wellcome Trust. J.P.C. is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pablo Couso.

Additional information

Edited by M. Akam

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, M., Pueyo, J.I., Greig, S.A. et al. Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster . Dev Genes Evol 213, 319–327 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-003-0326-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-003-0326-8

Keywords

Navigation