Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the chromatographic process by the correlation between the RM-values in adsorption and partition chromatography

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Investigations were carried out on the correlations between the RM-values measured in both adsorption and partition chromatography for some heterocyclic bases, 1-naphthylamine, 1-naphthol and phenol. Silica gel G and aluminium oxide G were used as the adsorbents while paraffin oil served as the liquid stationary phase in partition chromatography. Methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol and acetone were used as the mobile phases. It was found that, similarly to the previous papers [1–3], the relationship\(R_{M_i } = f(R_{M_i }^P )\) for all substances is linear described by the equation\(R_{M_i } = a R_{M_i }^P + b\). However, in contrast to the previously investigated chromatographic systems [1–3], the constants a and b take negative values. This is due to the fact that in the adsorbent — mobile phase and liquid stationary phase — mobile phase interphase layers, contrasting types of molecular interactions prevail. In the polar adsorbent — apolar liquid stationary phase systems the values of the constant a for the substances belonging to the same compound class were more differentiated than those in the polar adsorbent — polar liquid stationary phase systems. The constants b are characterized by a smaller differentiation. The results of the present examinations on the correlations between the RM-values in adsorption and partition chromatography show that these may be used in investigating the mechanism of the chromatographic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ościk J., Chojnacka G., Chem. Anal.12, 1213 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ościk J., Chojmacka G., Chromatographia6, 133 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chojnacka G., in Principles of Partition and Adsorption Liquid Chromatography (Polish Academy Sci., ed.) Warsaw, 1973, pp. 328–344.

  4. Ewell, R. H., Harrison, J. M., Berg L., Ind. Eng. Chem.36, 871 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pimentel G. C., McClellan A. L., The Hydrogen Bond, Freeman, San Francisco and London, 1960, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kiselev A. V., in Gas Chromatography 1964 (Goldup, A., ed.) London, 1965, p. 238.Kiselev A. V., Disc. Faraday Soc.40, 205 (1965).

  7. Jermyn M. A., Australian J. Chem.10, 55 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams, R. J. P., Hagdahl C., andTiselius A., Arkiv Kemi7, 1 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiselev A. V., Disc. Faraday Soc.40, 228 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avgul N. N., Kiselev A. V., in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 6, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Belyakova L. D., Kiselev A. V., andKovaleva N. V., Zh. Fiz. Khim.40, 1494 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ościk, J., Chojnacka, G. Investigation of the chromatographic process by the correlation between the RM-values in adsorption and partition chromatography. Chromatographia 7, 708–712 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269202

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02269202

Keywords

Navigation