Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of Hyaluronic Acid in a Chitosan-Based Formulation by RP C18 and HILIC LC–ESI-MS: an Evaluation of Matrix Effect

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two simple and fast C18 and HILIC liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry methods for the determination of hyaluronic acid (HA) in a mucoadhesive chitosan-based formulation were developed and validated. The performances of both methods were compared in terms of validation parameters and matrix effect. A simple sample preparation method based on sulphuric acid-based degradation was optimized for the detection of HA fragments (i.e. m/z 380 2-mer, m/z 759 4-mer, m/z 1,138 8-mer and m/z 1,518 16-mer). By operating under selected ion-monitoring mode, excellent selectivity towards chitosan fragments was obtained. For validation, good linearity, detection limits (<4 μg mL−1) and precision (RSD % < 16 %) were generally obtained on matrix with both columns. However, HILIC column exhibited improved performances in terms of HA fragment separation and selectivity. By analyzing on the C18 column the chitosan-based formulation and sample extracts from pig mucosa treated with the formulation, matrix effects exhibited a dependence of signal suppression degree (ranging from 37 to 83 %) as a function of the HA fragment dimension. The HILIC column afforded instead a significantly reduced suppression degree (ranging from 1 to 16 %) and a better separation. These findings demonstrated the improved performances of the HILIC column with respect to conventional C18 mechanism for the analysis of HA fragments in complex matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Kim IL, Mauck RL, Burdick JA (2011) Biomaterials 32:8771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liao YH, Jones SA, Forbes B, Martin GP, Brown MB (2005) Drug Deliv 12:327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grøndahl F, Tveit H, Akslen-Hoel LK, Prydz K (2011) Carbohydr Res 346:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenhöfer M, Scherübl R, Bernhardt G, Heilmann J, Buschauer A (2012) J Chromatogr A 1248:169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takegawa Y, Araki K, Fujitani N, Furukawa J, Sugiyama H, Sakai H, Shinohara Y (2011) Anal Chem 83:9443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langeslay DJ, Jones CJ, Beni S, Larive CK (2012) Methods Mol Biol 836:131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Volpi N (2007) Anal Chem 79:6390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Volpi N, Maccari F, Linhardt RJ (2008) Electrophoresis 29:3095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prebyl BS, Kaczmarek C, Tuinman AA, Baker DC (2003) Carbohydr Res 338:1381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kühn AV, Raith K, Sauerland V, Neubert RH (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 30:1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahoney DJ, Aplin RT, Calabro A, Hascall VC, Day AJ (2001) Glycobiol 11:1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang B, Chang Y, Weyers AM, Sterner E, Linhardt RJ (2012) J Chromatogr A 1225:91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Toyoda H, Muraki F, Imanari T, Kinoshita-Toyoda A (2011) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 879:950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alkrad JA, Merstani Y, Neubert RH (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 30:913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality.html

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly carried out with the financial support of MDT Int’l SA, Geneva, Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Elviri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vigliano, M., Bianchera, A., Bettini, R. et al. Determination of Hyaluronic Acid in a Chitosan-Based Formulation by RP C18 and HILIC LC–ESI-MS: an Evaluation of Matrix Effect. Chromatographia 76, 1761–1766 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2533-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2533-4

Keywords

Navigation