Skip to main content
Log in

Suitable triggering algorithms for detecting strong ground motions using MEMS accelerometers

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the recent development of digital Micro Electro Mechanical System (MEMS) sensors, the cost of monitoring and detecting seismic events in real time can be greatly reduced. Ability of MEMS accelerograph to record a seismic event depends upon the efficiency of triggering algorithm, apart from the sensor’s sensitivity. There are several classic triggering algorithms developed to detect seismic events, ranging from basic amplitude threshold to more sophisticated pattern recognition. Algorithms based on STA/LTA are reported to be computationally efficient for real time monitoring. In this paper, we analyzed several STA/LTA algorithms to check their efficiency and suitability using data obtained from the Quake Catcher Network (network of MEMS accelerometer stations). We found that most of the STA/LTA algorithms are suitable for use with MEMS accelerometer data to accurately detect seismic events. However, the efficiency of any particular algorithm is found to be dependent on the parameter set used (i.e., window width of STA, LTA and threshold level).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alandry B, Dumas N, Latorre L, Mailly F and Nouet P (2009), “A Mems-based Multi-sensor Platform for Consumer Applications,” Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics, PRIME, 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen R (1978), “Automatic Earthquake Recognition and Timing from Single Traces,” Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 68: 1521–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DP, Cobb J, Korpela E, Lebofsky M and Werthimer D (2002), “SETI@home: An Experiment in Public-Resource Computing,” Communications of the ACM, 45: 56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botella F, Rosa-Herranz J, Giner JJ, Molina S and Galianamerino JJ (2003), “A Real-time Earthquake Detector with Prefiltering by Wavelets,” Computers & Geosciences, 29: 911–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capon J, Greenfield RL and Lacoss R (1969), “Longperiod Signal Processing Results for the Large Aperture Seismic Array,” Geophysics Journal, 34: 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung AI, Neighbors C, Belmonte A, Miller M, Sepulveda HH, Christensen C, Jakka RS, Cochran ES and Lawrence JF (2011), “The Quake-Catcher Network Rapid Aftershock Mobilization Program Following the 2010 M8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake,” Seismological Research Letters, 82(4): 526–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung PJ, Jost ML and Bohme JF (2001), “Estimation of Seismic-wave Parameters and Signal Detection using Maximum-likelihood Methods,” Computers & Geosciences, 27: 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran ES, Lawrence JF, Christensen C and Chung A (2009b), “A Novel Strong Motion Seismic Network for Community Participation in Earthquake Monitoring,” IEEE Instrumentation and measurement Magazine, 12(6): 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran ES, Lawrence JF, Christensen C and Jakka RS (2009a), “The Quake-catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons,” Seismological Research Letters, 80(1): 26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farine M, Thorburn N and Mougenot D (2004), “General Application of MEMS Sensors for Land Seismic Acquisition-Is It Time?” The Leading Edge, 23: 246–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberger W (1963), “An Approximate Method in Signal Detection,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, 20: 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretcher K and Sharon (1983), “Walsh Transforms in Seismic Event Detection,” IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 25.

  • Gibbons SJ and Ringdal F (2006), “The Detection of Low Magnitude Seismic Events Using Arraybased Waveform Correlation,” Geophysical Journal International, 165: 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goforth T and Herrin E (1981), “An Automatic Seismic Signal Detection Algorithm Based on the Walsh Transform,” Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 71: 1351–1360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griscom DT (2007), “SeisMac, Turn Your Apple Laptop into A Self-contained Seismograph,” Seismological Research Letters, 77: 731–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland J (2003), “Earthquake Data Recorded by the MEMS Accelerometer,” Seismological Research Letters, 74: 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houliston DJ, Waugh G and Laughlin J (1984), “Automatic Real-time Event Detection for Seismic Networks,” Computers & Geosciences, 10: 413–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakka RS, Cochran ES and Lawrence JF (2010), “Earthquake Source Characterization by the Isochrone Back Projection Method Using Near-source Ground Motions,” Geophysical Journal International, 182: 1058–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jen Havskov (2001), Instrumentation in Earthquake Seismology, Springer Publishing Company, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magotra N, Ahmed N and Chael E (1989), “Singlestation Seismic Event Detection and Location,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 27: 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF and Freeman WH (1958), “Elementary Seismology,” Geological Journal, San Francisco, 2(2): 768–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma BK, Kumar A and Murthy VM (2010), “Evaluation of Seismic Events Detection Algorithms,” Journal Geological Society of India, 75: 533–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swindell H and Snell N (1977), “Station Processor Automatic Signal Detection System, Phase I: Final Report, Station Processor Software Development,” Texas Instruments Report No. ALEX (01)-FR-77-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers M, Aster R, Young C, Beiriger J, Harris M, Moore S and Trujillo J (1998), “A Comparison of Selected Trigger Algorithms for Automated Global Seismic Phase and Event Detection,” Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 88: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young C, Beiriger J, Harris M, Moore S, Trujillo J, Withers M and Aster R (1996), “The Waveform Correlation Event Detection System Project Phase I: Issues in Prototype Development and Testing,” Internal Report, Department of Energy, Office of Research and Development, NN20, 45 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Sankar Jakka.

Additional information

Supported by: IIT Roorkee under the Faculty Initiation Grant No. 100556

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakka, R.S., Garg, S. Suitable triggering algorithms for detecting strong ground motions using MEMS accelerometers. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 27–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0004-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0004-7

Keywords

Navigation