Dissolved oxygen and nutrient budgets in a phytotreatment pond colonised by Ulva spp.

Abstract

Net daily budgets of dissolved oxygen (O₂), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN = NH ⁺₄ +NO ⁻₂ +NO ⁻₃ ) and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) were determined in a pond colonised by Ulva spp. This pond received wastewater from a land-based fish farm and was used as a phytotreatment plant. Three consecutive 24-h cycles of measurements were performed with 8–14 samplings per day. Water samples were collected at the inlet and outlet of the pond and budgets were estimated from differences between inlet and outlet loadings. The first cycle was started when Ulva biomass was 8 kg m⁻², as wet weight. The second cycle was performed after the harvest of ~20% of the macroalgal biomass and the third after the harvest of another ~20% of the remaining biomass. Ulva removal was very fast (<1 h) and samplings for cycles 2 and 3 were started two hours after harvesting, so that the whole experiment lasted ~80 h. When Ulva biomass was at its maximum, the aquatic system was heterotrophic with an O₂ demand of 519 mol d⁻¹ and a net regeneration of DIC (2686 mol d⁻¹), NH ⁺₄ (49 mol d⁻¹) and SRP (2.5 mol d⁻¹). The DIC to O₂ ratio was an indicator of persistent anaerobic metabolism. Following the first harvest intervention, this system displayed a prompt response and shifted toward a lower O₂ demand (from −519 to −13 mol d⁻¹), with a lesser regeneration degree of NH ⁺₄ (11.4 mol d⁻¹) and DIC (1066 mol d⁻¹). After the second Ulva removal the net budget of SRP became negative (−1.0 mol d⁻¹). By integrating these results over the three days cycle we estimated that in order to operate an efficient nutrient control and maintain macroalgal mats in a healthy status the optimal Ulva biomass should be well below ~4 kg m⁻² as wet weight. Above this threshold, self-limitation would render most of the algal mat unable to exploit light and nutrients. An efficient removal of nitrogen and phosphorus could be attained through the management of macroalgal biomass only with an optimisation of recipient surface to nutrient loading ratio.