Abstract
Invasive trees can cause catastrophic reductions in diversity in invaded grasslands and savannas. Such reductions often appear to be particularly severe in the new biogeographic ranges of these invaders. We present results of a field study that examined the effect of slash pine (Pinus elliottii), native to the southeastern US, on savanna groundcover vegetation in the state of São Paulo in Brazil (cerrado) and in its native range in Mississippi (USA) following fire exclusion. We compared the difference in several community attributes between slash pine understories and adjacent open area in both São Paulo and Mississippi, and compared the effects of needle litter on native species in both continents. Slash pine was correlated with lower non-graminoid species richness and plant density in both São Paulo and Mississippi; however, these apparent negative effects were 4.6 and 11 times stronger in the non-native range of Brazil (for richness and density, respectively). Native graminoids were not present in invaded cerrado. Overhead slash pine canopy cover, pine density, and needle depth were 5.2, 3.7, and at 14 times higher, respectively, in Brazil than in Mississippi savannas, for similarly-aged pine stands. One year after implementing needle litter treatments in Brazilian cerrado and restored Mississippi savanna, plant density and non-graminoid species richness were highly suppressed, but to similar degrees in both ranges. Our results suggest that higher rates of needle deposition, associated with higher tree densities, contribute to the stronger suppression of native species in Brazil than in Mississippi.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becerra PI, Catford JA, Inderjit M et al (2017) Inhibitory effects of Eucalyptus globulus on understorey plant growth and species richness are greater in non-native regions. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12676
Brewer JS (1998) Patterns of plant species richness in a wet slash-pine (Pinus elliottii) Savanna. J Torrey Bot Soc 125:216. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997219
Brewer JS (2017) Stochastic losses of fire-dependent endemic herbs revealed by a 65-year chronosequence of dispersal-limited woody plant encroachment. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3020
Brewer JS, Bailey WC (2014) Competitive effects of non-native plants are lowest in native plant communities that are most vulnerable to invasion. Plant Ecol 215:821–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0334-y
Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523
Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0436:NWISAT]2.0.CO;2
Clewell AF (1985) Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida Panhandle. University Presses of Florida, Florida State University, Florida
Covington WW, Moore MM (1994) Southwestern ponderosa pine forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. J For 92:39–47
Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ et al (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153–154
de Abreu RCR, Durigan G (2011) Changes in the plant community of a Brazilian grassland savannah after 22 years of invasion by Pinus elliottii Engelm. Plant Ecol Divers 4:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2011.594101
de Almeida RS, Cielo-Filho R, de Souza SCPM et al (2010) Campo Sujo Úmido: fisionomia de Cerrado ameaçada pela contaminação de Pinus elliottii Engelm. na Estação Ecológica de Itapeva, Estado de São Paulo. Campo Sujo Úmido: Cerrado physiognomy threatened by the contamination of Pinus elliottii Engelm. in the Itapeva Ecological Station, São Paulo state. Revista do Instituto Florestal 22:71–91
Dickie IA, Bolstridge N, Cooper JA, Peltzer DA (2010) Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 187:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03277.x
Eleuterius LN (1975) The plant life of the coastal mainland, associated waters and barrier islands of Mississippi with reference to the contribution as a natural resource. In: Irby BN, McCaughan D (eds) Guide to the marine resources of Mississippi. Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium, Fox Printing Company, Hattiesburg, pp 59–83
Gilman EF, Watson DG (1994) Pinus elliottii Slash pine. USDA Forest Service Fact Sheet ST-463
Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347
Harper RM (1914) A superficial study of the pine-barren vegetation of Mississippi. Bull Torrey Bot Club 41:551–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/2479620
Haugo RD, Halpern CB (2007) Vegetation responses to conifer encroachment in a western Cascade meadow: a chronosequence approach. Can J Bot 85:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-024
Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
Hierro JL, Villarreal D, Eren Ö et al (2006) Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger abroad than at home. Am Nat 168:144–156. https://doi.org/10.1086/505767
Hilgard EW (1860) A report on the geology and agriculture of the state of Mississippi. Mississippi State Geological Survey, Jackson
Hinman SE, Brewer JS, Ashley SW (2008) Shrub seedling establishment is limited by dispersal, slow growth, and fire in two wet pine savannahs in Mississippi. Nat Areas J 28:37–43
Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2004) Effect of invasive plant species on temperate wetland plant diversity. Conserv Biol 18:1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00391.x
Huston MA (2004) Management strategies for plant invasions: manipulating productivity, disturbance, and competition. Divers Distrib 10:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00083.x
Kaur R, Gonzáles WL, Llambi LD et al (2012) Community impacts of Prosopis juliflora invasion: biogeographic and congeneric comparisons. PLoS ONE 7:e44966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044966
Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/417067a
Langdon B, Pauchard A, Aguayo M (2010) Pinus contorta invasion in the Chilean Patagonia: local patterns in a global context. Biol Invasions 12:3961–3971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9817-5
Laughlin DC, Bakker JD, Daniels ML et al (2008) Restoring plant species diversity and community composition in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem. Plant Ecol 197:139–151
Levine JM, Vilà M, Antonio CMD et al (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:775–781
Meira Neto JAA, Martins FR, Valente GE (2007) Composição florística e espectro biológico na Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Árvore 31:907–922. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622007000500015
Nuñez MA, Dickie IA (2014) Invasive belowground mutualists of woody plants. Biol Invasions 16:645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0612-y
Pál RW, Chen S, Nagy DU, Callaway RM (2015) Impacts of Solidago gigantea on other species at home and away. Biol Invasions 17:3317–3325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0955-7
Peet RK, Allard DJ (1993) Longleaf pine vegetation of the southern Atlantic and eastern Gulf Coast regions: a preliminary classification. In: Hermann SM (ed) 18th proceedings of the tall timbers fire ecology conference. Tall Timbers Research, Tallahassee, FL, pp 45–81
Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM (2011) A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am J Bot 98:539–548. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000402
Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE et al (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x
Qin R-M, Zheng Y-L, Valiente-Banuet A et al (2013) The evolution of increased competitive ability, innate competitive advantages, and novel biochemical weapons act in concert for a tropical invader. New Phytol 197:979–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12071
Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2004) Soil biota facilitate Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol Appl 14:1737–1745. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5204
Ricciardi A, Cohen J (2007) The invasiveness of an introduced species does not predict its impact. Biol Invasions 9:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9034-4
Richardson DM, Williams PA, Hobbs RJ (1994) Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. J Biogeogr 21:511–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845655
Shah MA, Callaway RM, Shah T, Houseman GR, Pal RW, Xiao S, Luo W, Rosche C, Reshi ZA, Khasa DP, Chen S (2014) Conyza canadensis suppresses plant diversity in its nonnative ranges but not at home: a transcontinental comparison. New Phytol 202:1286–1296
Simberloff D (2011) Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature 475:36
Simberloff D, Nuñez MA, Ledgard NJ et al (2010) Spread and impact of introduced conifers in South America: lessons from other southern hemisphere regions. Austral Ecol 35:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02058.x
Simberloff D, Souza L, Nuñez MA et al (2012) The natives are restless, but not often and mostly when disturbed. Ecology 93:598–607. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1232.1
Sun Y, Müller-Schärer H, Maron JL, Schaffner U (2015) Biogeographic effects on early establishment of an invasive alien plant. Am J Bot 102:621–625
Taylor KT, Maxwell BD, Pauchard A et al (2016) Native versus non-native invasions: similarities and differences in the biodiversity impacts of Pinus contorta in introduced and native ranges. Divers Distrib 22:578–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12419
Valéry L, Fritz H, Lefeuvre J-C, Simberloff D (2008) In search of a real defintion of the biological phenomenon of invasion itself. Biol Invasions 10:1345–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9209-7
Veldman JW, Brudvig LA, Damschen EI et al (2014) Fire frequency, agricultural history and the multivariate control of pine savanna understorey plant diversity. J Veg Sci 25:1438–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12195
Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
Zanchetta D, de Pinheiro LS (2007) Análise biofísica dos processos envolvidos na invasão biológica de sementes de Pinus elliottii na Estaçao de Itirapina - SP alternativas de manejo. Climatol e Estud da Paisag 2:72–90
Zanchetta D, Diniz FV (2006) Estudo da contaminação biológica por Pinus spp. em três diferentes áreas na Estação Ecológica de Itirapina (SP, Brasil). Study on Pinus spp. biological contamination in three different areas within the Itirapina Ecological Station (São Paulo, Brazil). Revista do Instituto Florestal 18:1–14
Acknowledgements
We thank the staffs of Grand Bay National Wildlife Refuge and Santa Bárbara Ecological Station for management and access to the sites and Matthew Abbott, Sean Moyer, the 2014 Plant Ecology class at the University of Mississippi, and Antonio Melo, Natashi Pilon, and Geissianni Assis for help with field work. Funding was provided by the University of Mississippi Biology Department to SB and a grant to GD from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil) – CNPq (#303179/2016-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewer, J.S., Souza, F.M., Callaway, R.M. et al. Impact of invasive slash pine (Pinus elliottii) on groundcover vegetation at home and abroad. Biol Invasions 20, 2807–2820 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1734-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1734-z