Skip to main content
Log in

Die Abhängigkeit der Reaktionszeit von der zeitlichen Folge optischer Reize

  • Published:
Kybernetik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An apparatus consisting of (a) a small computer, (b) an oscilloscope light-dot controlled by it, and (c) a pencil-shaped peg containing three accelerometers, which are sampled at 150μsec intervals by the computer, has been used to measure simple reaction time for human hand-movement. The stimulus, a jump of the light dot, was presented without a warning signal in series of 100 jumps either after a fixed period or a random time. The average interstimulus interval (ISI) was between 1.3 and 15.8 sec. For every parameter set 1,000 reaction times (RTs) were accumulated during 10 different days.

The main results are: (a) RT increases with increasing mean ISI; (b) RT is longer for random ISIs than for constant ones; (c) RT increases slightly with time accumulating during runs; (d) within a series of random ISIs, RT is neither depending on the value of the last ISI before reaction nor on that of the last but one; (e) the probability distribution of RTs has a standard deviation increasing with mean ISI and from periodic to random ISI, and a non-negligible, roughly constant skewness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Adams, J. A., Boulter, L. R.: Spatial and temporal uncertainty as determinants of vigilance behavior. J. exp. Psychol. 67, 127–131 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bente, D., Wanderer, E.: Die Altersabhängigkeit der Reaktionszeit im Dauerreaktionstest. Vita hum. (Basel) 3, 207–219 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan, W., Hardesty, D. L., Avant, L. L.: Response latency with constant and variable interval schedules. Percept. Mot. Skills 20, 969–972 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. — Avant, L. L., Lankford, H. G.: Serial reaction-time and the temporal pattern of prior signals. Amer. J. Psychol. 79, 551–559 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borghi, J. H.: Distribution of human reaction time. Percept. Mot. Skills 21, 212–214 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Botwinick, J., Brinley, J. F.: An analysis of set in relation to reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 63, 568–574 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J. L.: The effect of positive acceleration on visual reaction time. J. Aviat. Med. 29, 48–58 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Church, R. M., Camp, D. S.: Change in reaction-time as a function of knowledge of results. Amer. J. Psychol. 78, 102–106 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, D. H.: Effect of preliminary muscular tension on reaction latency. Res. Quart. 39, 60–66 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deecke, L., Scheid, P., Kornhuber, H. H.: Distribution of readiness potential, pre-motion positivity, and motor potential of the human cerebral cortex preceding voluntary finger movements. Exp. Brain Res. 7, 158–168 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elbel, H., Schleyer, F.: Blutalkohol. Stuttgart: G. Thieme 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eldred, E., Granit, R., Merton, P. A.: Supraspinal control of the muscle spindle and its significance. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 122, 498–523 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elliot, R.: Simple visual and simple auditory reaction time: a comparison. Psychon. Sci. 10, 335–336 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamer, J. R.: Effects of low level, low frequency electric fields on human reaction time. NASA-CR-92700 (1967).

  15. Hardesty, D., Bevan, W.: Response latency as a function of the temporal pattern of stimulation. Psychol. Rec. 15, 385–392 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hildebrandt, G., Engel, P.: Der Einfluß des Atemrhythmus auf die Reaktionszeit. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 278, 113–129 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hori, H., Nagasawa, A.: An experimental investigation on reaction time — especially on the results of visual, accustic reaction times by hand and foot. Koku igaku jikkentai hokoku (Report of the Aero Medical Experimental Group) (Japan) Nr. 31, 11 (1960).

  18. Karlin, L.: Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. J. exp. Psychol. 58, 185–191 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  19. — Mordkoff, A. M.: Decreased reaction time produced by discordant warning and reaction stimuli. Psychon. Sci. 9, 555–556 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kleinmann, K. M., Stern, J. A.: Task complexity, electrodermal activity and reaction time. Psychophysiology 5, 51–60 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Klemmer, E. T.: Time uncertainty in simple reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 51, 179–184 (1956); 54, 195–200 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kohfeld, D. L.: Stimulus intensity and adaption level as determinants of simple reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 76, 468–473 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Küpfmüller, K.: Die Vorgänge in Regelsystemen mit Laufzeit. Arch, elektr. Übertrag. 7, 71–78 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lambert, G. E.: Modifications des temps de réaction et de l'électro-encophalogramme au cours d'un sejour prolonge en zone aride. Arid. Zone Res. XXIV. Proc. of the Lucknow Symp. 1962 (Paris 1964), p. 363–396.

  25. Latour, P. L.: Evidence of internal clocks in the human operator. Acta psychol. (Amst.) 27, 341–348 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mayne, R.: Some engineering aspects of the mechanism of body control. Electr. Engng. 70, 207–212 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  27. McCormack, P. D., Prysiazniuk, A. W.: Reaction-time and regularity of inter-stimulus interval. Percept. Mot. Skills 13, 15–18 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Monnier, M.: Retinal, cortical and motor responses to photic stimulation in man. J. Neurophysiol. 15, 469–475 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pease, V.: The intensity-time relation of a stimulus in simple visual reaction time. Psychol. Record 14, 157–164 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  30. — Sticht, T. G.: Reaction time as a function of onset and offset stimulation of the fovea and periphery. Percept. Mot. Skills 20, 549–554 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raab, D. H., Grossberg, M.: Reaction time to changes in the intensity of white noise. J. exp. Psychol. 69, 609–612 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson, D. N.: Visual reaction time and the human alpha rhythm: the effects of stimulus luminance, area, and duration. J. exp. Psychol. 71, 16–25 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidtke, H.: Der Einfluß der Reizintensität auf die Reaktionszeit. Psychol. Beitr. 6, H. 2 (1961).

  34. Teichner, W. H.: Recent studies of simple reaction time. Psychol. Bull. 51, 128–149 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vossius, G., Poklekowski, G.: Untersuchungen über den Einfluß der Reaktionszeit auf die gezielte menschliche Handbewegung. Z. Biol. 109, 458–465 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vossius, G.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die gezielte Handbewegung des Menschen. Abhandl. Akad. Wiss. u. Lit. Mainz, mat.-nat. Kl. 4, 107–127 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  37. —: Das System der Augenbewegung. Z. Biol. 112, 27–57 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  38. — Der sogenannte „innere” Regelkreis der Willkürbewegung. Kybernetik 1, 28–32 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  39. — Die Vorhersageeigensohaften des Systems der Willkürbewegung. In: Neuere Ergebnisse der Kybernetik, eds. K. Steinbuch u. S.W. Wagner, p. 196–209. München: Oldenburg 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Whitley, J. D.: Faster reaction time through increasing intent to respond. Percept. Mot. Skills 22, 663–666 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zahn, T. P., Rosenthal, D.: Simple reaction time as a function of the relative frequency of the preparatory interval. J. exp. Psychol. 72, 15–19 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Jetzt: Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg i.Br.

Zur Zeit: CRESS, York University, Toronto, (Canada).

Wir danken Herrn Prof. B. Hassenstein für manche Diskussion über kybernetische Probleme und einen ersten Hinweis auf die Fragen der gezielten Handbewegung. Der Rechner stand aus Mitteln zur Verfügung, die vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Wissenschaft für andere Experimente zur Verfügung gestellt waren, wir möchten auch für diese Unterstützung danken. Schließlich danken wir der Zentralstelle für Luftfahrt-Dokumentation und -Information, München, für wertvolle Literaturhinweise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Täumer, R., Schlier, C., Schmidt, C. et al. Die Abhängigkeit der Reaktionszeit von der zeitlichen Folge optischer Reize. Kybernetik 7, 183–191 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289405

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289405

Navigation