Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrogeomorphic controls on soil carbon composition in two classes of subalpine wetlands

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands play a vital role in terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration, but the sensitivity of their C stocks to disturbance remains uncertain, requiring enhanced understanding of the processes that govern C storage and removal. The unique conditions in wetlands from different hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classes likely regulate the cycling, storage and vulnerabilities of wetland soil C stocks. To determine how differences in hydrogeomorphic setting influence soil organic carbon (SOC) processing, we compared C content and composition between depressional and slope wetlands located in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Isolated depressional wetlands were characterized by seasonally declining water tables, slow discharge, high clay content, and thick organic horizons. Slope wetlands received perennial groundwater inputs and had coarser soil textures and thinner organic horizons. Seasonal snowmelt inputs coupled with low hydrologic discharge and higher clay content in depressional wetlands were predicted to sustain anoxic conditions, leading to high SOC content and chemically reduced C compounds. Depressional wetland soils had higher SOC content at depth and higher porewater DOC concentrations compared to slope wetland soils. Solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated that aliphatic compounds were the dominant SOC component in depressional wetlands compared to aromatic C forms in the slope wetlands. The higher prevalence of aliphatic carbon in depressional wetland soils suggests that stored SOC is protected by anaerobic conditions to a greater extent than in the slope wetlands, and that this SOC may be more vulnerable to drying and oxic conditions associated with wetland drainage and climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Tom Wietsma for the access to the TOC analyzer, Ryan Taylor for his contribution to bulk soil analyses, Kelsey Dean for extensive field work, and Dr. Daniel Scott for assistance with carbon age calibrations, statistical analyses, and mapping. Funding was provided by USDA NIFA AFRI postdoctoral fellowship no. 2012-01330, and the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2013-67019-21359 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. A portion of the research was performed using EMSL, a DOE Office of Science User Facility sponsored by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charles C. Rhoades or Thomas Borch.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Breck Bowden.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 219 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daugherty, E.E., McKee, G.A., Bergstrom, R. et al. Hydrogeomorphic controls on soil carbon composition in two classes of subalpine wetlands. Biogeochemistry 145, 161–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00597-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00597-y

Keywords

Navigation