Skip to main content
Log in

A ten year record of nitrate retention and solute trends in a Wisconsin sand plains stream: temporal variation at multiple scales

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nitrate retention is an important ecosystem service provided by streams which reduces nitrogen loads to downstream ecosystems. However, most inferences about nitrate retention and uptake in streams are based on measurements at sub-annual scales. Our objective was to evaluate variation in nitration retention and solute concentrations at weekly to decadal time scales. We measured nitrate and chloride concentration, nitrate flux and nitrate retention in Emmons Creek, a groundwater-dominated, nitrate-rich stream in central Wisconsin during a 10-year period. We used a two-station mass balance approach to measure nitrate retention while accounting for groundwater inputs. Surface water nitrate concentration, nitrate yield and nitrate retention exhibited strong seasonal variation. Seasonal Kendall tests revealed positive trends for surface water discharge, nitrate and chloride concentrations and groundwater chloride concentration, but not nitrate retention. Generalized additive mixed models (GAMM), accounting for serial autocorrelations, also indicated positive trends in surface water nitrate and chloride concentrations but no trend for nitrate retention. Nitrate retention averaged 370 mg NO3-N m−2 d−1 (± 316 SD) and was highest during the spring (512 mg NO3-N m−2 d−1 ± 319), followed by summer (460 ± 322), fall (340 ± 281) and winter (165 ± 212). Nitrate retention rates in Emmons Creek were relatively high compared to most published estimates. However, our results suggest that Emmons Cr. may have saturated its capacity to retain nitrate during a period when nitrate yield from its watershed increased, which is an important finding given the increases in N availability in many regions of earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Steudler P, Melillo JM (1989) Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosaystems. Bioscience 39:378–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aber JD, Ollinger SV, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, Holmes RT, Freuder RJ, Goodale CL (2002) Inorganic nitrogen losses from a forested ecosystem in response to physical, chemical, biotic, and climatic perturbations. Ecosystems 5:648–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0203-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE (2000) Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403:758–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander LV et al (2006) Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J Geophys Res 111:D05109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arce MI, von Schiller D, Gómez R (2014) Variation in nitrate uptake and denitrification rates across a salinity gradient in Mediterranean semiarid streams. Aquat Sci 76:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0336-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantine DJ, Davies-Colley RJ (2014) Water quality trends in New Zealand rivers: 1989–2009. Environ Monit Assess 186:1939–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3508-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Hall RO, Likens GE (2002) Whole-system estimates of nitrification and nitrate uptake in streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Ecosystems 5:419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Likens GE, Buso DC, Driscoll CT (2003) In-stream uptake dampens effects of major forest disturbance on watershed nitrogen export. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10304–10308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernot MJ, Dodds WK (2005) Nitrogen retention, removal and saturation in lotic ecosystems. Ecosystems 8:442–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beusen AHW, Bouwman AF, Van Beek LPH, Mogollón JM, Middelburg JJ (2016) Global riverine N and P transport to ocean increased during the 20th century despite increased retention along the aquatic continuum. Biogeosciences 13:2441–2451. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2441-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaen PJ, Khamis K, Lloyd C, Comer-Warner S, Ciocca F, Thomas RM, MacKenzie AR, Krause S (2017) High-frequency monitoring of catchment nutrient exports reveals highly variable storm event responses and dynamic source zone activation. J Geophys Res 122:2265–2281. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JG003904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhlke JK, Harvey JW, Voytek MA (2004) Reach-scale isotope tracer experiment to quantify denitrification and related processes in a nitrate-rich stream. Limol. Oceanogr. 49:821–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhlke JK, Antweiler RC, Harvey JW, Laursen AE, Smith LK, Smith RL, Voytek MA (2009) Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA. Biogeochemistry 93:117–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9282-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs MA, Lautz LK, Hare DK (2014) Residence time control on hot moments of net nitrate production and uptake in the hyporheic zone. Hydrol Process 28:3741–3751. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BA, Guldan NM (2005) Understanding long-term baseflow water quality trends using a synoptic survey of the groundwater-surface water interface, Central Wisconsin. J. Environ. Qual. 34:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PD, Wurtsbaugh WA, Nydick KR (2008) Lakes and forests as determinants of downstream nutrient concentrations in small mountain watersheds. Arct Antarct Alp Res 40:462–469. https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(07-052)[BROWN]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukaveckas PA, Likens GE, Winter TC, Buso DC (1998) A comparison of methods for deriving solute flux rates using long-term data from streams in the Mirror Lake watershed. Water Air Soil Pollut 105:277–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukaveckas PA, Guelda DL, Jack J, Koch R, Sellers T, Shostell J (2005) Effects of point source loadings, sub-basin inputs and longitudinal variation in material retention on C, N, and P delivery from the Ohio River Basin. Ecosystems 8:825–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0044-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DA (1998) Retention of NO3- in an upland stream environment: a mass balance approach. Biogeochemistry 40:73–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns DA, Miller MP, Pellerin BA, Capel PD (2016) Patterns of diel variation in nitrate concentrations in the Potomac River. Freshw Sci 35:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1086/688777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clilverd HM, Jones JB, Kielland K (2008) Nitrogen retention in the hyporheic zone of a glacial river in interior Alaska. Biogeochemistry 88:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covino TP, McGlynn BL, McNamara RA (2010) Tracer additions for spiraling curve characterization (TASCC): quantifying stream nutrient uptake kinetics from ambient to saturation. Limnol Oceanogr 8:484–498. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff JH, Tesoriero AJ, Richardson WB, Strauss EA, Munn WD (2008) Whole-stream response to nitrate loading in three streams draining agricultural landscapes. J Environ Qual 37:1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Band LE, Groffman PM, Bernhardt ES (2015) Mechanisms driving the seasonality of catchment scale nitrate export: evidence for riparian ecohydrologic controls. Water Resour. Res 51(6):3982–3997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl SR, Valett HM, Webster JR (2006) Nitrogen saturation in stream ecosystems. Ecology 87:3140–3151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimers MC, Watmough SA (2016) Increasing nitrate concentrations in streams draining into Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 42:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensign SH, Doyle MW (2006) Nutrient spiraling in streams and river networks. J Geophys Res 111:G04009. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CD et al (2017) Sustained biogeochemical impacts of wildfire in a mountain lake catchment. Ecosystems 20:813–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0064-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway JN et al (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Li DJ, Zhang YW (2012) Nutrients and particulate organic matter discharged by the Changjiang (Yangtze River): seasonal variations and temporal trends. J Geophys Res 117:G04001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JG001952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Nathan RJ (2004) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. Wiley, West Sussex, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths NA, Johnson LT (2018) Influence of dual nitrogen and phosphorus additions on nutrient uptake and saturation kinetics in a forested headwater stream. Freshw Sci 37:810–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO et al (2009) Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by N-15 addition experiments: total uptake. Limnol Oceanogr 54:653–665. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.3.0653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday SJ, Skeffington RA, Wade AJ, Neal C, Reynolds B, Norris D, Kirchner JW (2013) Upland streamwater nitrate dynamics across decadal to sub-daily timescales: a case study of Plynlimon, Wales. Biogeosciences 10:8013–8038. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-8013-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan JB et al (2010) Hydrologic and biotic influences on nitrate removal in a subtropical spring-fed river. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55:249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (1992) Statistical methods in water resources. Studies in Environmental Science, Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources, Chapter A3. In: Book 4, Hydrologic analysis and interpretation. techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey. United States Geological Survey, Reston.

  • Hirsch RM, De Cicco LA (2015) User guide to exploration and graphics for RivEr trends (EGRET) and dataRetrieval—R packages for hydrologic data (version 2.0): U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods. US Geological Survey, Reston.

  • Hirsch RM, Moyer DL, Archfield SA (2010) Weighted regressions on time, discharge, and season (WRTDS), with an application to Chesapeake Bay river inputs. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:857–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00482.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoellein TJ, Tank JL, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Entrekin SA, Lamberti GA (2007) Controls on spatial and temporal variation of nutrient uptake in three Michigan headwater streams. Limnol Oceanogr 52:1964–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CLR (1965) Geology and water resources of Portage County, Wisconsin. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1796. University of Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Madison.

  • Howarth RW, Marino R (2006) Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnol Oceanogr 51:364–376. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2014: Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.

  • Ignatius AR, Rasmussen TC (2016) Small reservoir effects on headwater water quality in the rural-urban fringe, Georgia Piedmont, USA. J Hydrol 8:145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha M, Arnold JG, Gassman PW, Giorgi F, Gu RR (2006) Climate change sensitivity assessment on Upper Mississippi River Basin streamflows using SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42:997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04510.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Likens GE, Belt KT, Stack WP, Kelly VR, Band LE, Fisher GT (2005) Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13517–13520. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506414102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz JV, Hensley R, Brase L, Borchard D, Rode R (2017) High frequency measurements of reach scale nitrogen uptake in a fourth order river with contrasting hydromorphology and variable water chemistry (Weisse Elster, Germany). Water Resour Res 53:328–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laboski CAM, Peters JB (2012) Nutrient application guidelines for field, vegetable, and fruit crops in Wisconsin (A2809). University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, p 94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown K, Heppell CM, Trimmer M, Binley A, Heathwaite AL, Byrne P, Zhang H (2015) The interplay between transport and reaction rates as controls on nitrate attenuation in permeable, streambed sediments. J Geophys Res 120:1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassaletta L, Garcia-Gomez H, Gimeno BS, Rovira JV (2009) Agriculture-induced increase in nitrate concentrations in stream waters of a large Mediterranean catchment over 25 years (1981–2005). Sci Total Environ 407:6034–6043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford SH, Lautz LK, Vidon PG, Stella JC (2017) Impact of seasonal changes in stream metabolism on nitrate concentrations in an urban stream. Biogeochemistry 133:317–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0336-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Chan KS, Schilling KE (2013) Nitrate concentration trends in Iowa's rivers, 1998 to 2012: what challenges await nutrient reduction initiatives? J Environ Qual 42:1822–1828. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.03.0111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loecke TD, Burgin AJ, Riveros-Iregui DA, Ward AS, Thomas SA, Davis CA, St Clair MA (2017) Weather whiplash in agricultural regions drives deterioration of water quality. Biogeochemistry 133:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0315-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RW, Sponseller RA, Gundale MJ, Stendahl J, Fridman J, Hogberg P, Laudon H (2016) Long-term declines in stream and river inorganic nitrogen (N) export correspond to forest change. Ecol Appl 26:545–556. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RA, Harms TK, Grimm NB (2011) Chronic N loading reduces N retention across varying base flows in a desert river. J North Am Benthol Soc 30:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan S, Kannan N, Neupane RP, McDaniel R, Kumar S (2016) Climate change impacts on the hydrological processes of a small agricultural watershed. Climate 4:56. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli4040056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM (2017) Glacier shrinkage driving global changes in downstream systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9770–9778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619807114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland PJ et al (2008) Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading. Nature 452:202–205. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien JM, Dodds WK, Wilson KC, Murdock JN, Eichmiller J (2007) The saturation of N cycling in Central Plains streams: 15N experiments across a broad gradient of nitrate concentrations. Biogeochemistry 84:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohrui K, Mitchell MJ (1997) Nitrogen saturation in Japanese forest watersheds. Ecol Appl 7:391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oulehle F, Chuman T, Hruska J, Kram P, McDowell WH, Myska O, Navratil T, Tesar M (2017) Recovery from acidification alters concentrations and fluxes of solutes from Czech catchments. Biogeochemistry 132:251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0298-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payn RA, Webster JR, Mulholland PJ, Valett HM, Dodds WK (2005) Estimation of stream nutrient uptake from nutrient addition experiments. Limnol Oceanogr 3:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Ward JV (1989) Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1805–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers SP, Johnson RA, Stanley EH (2012) Nutrient retention and the problem of hydrologic disconnection in streams and wetlands. Ecosystems 15:435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen JJ, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Riis T, Friberg N (2011) Stream ecosystem properties and processes along a temperature gradient. Aquat Ecol 45:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-010-9349-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts BJ, Mulholland PJ (2007) In-stream biotic control on nutrient biogeochemistry in a forested stream, West Fork of Walker Branch. J Geophys Res 112:G04002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer TV, David MB, Gentry LE (2006) Timing of riverine export of nitrate and phosphorus from agricultural watersheds in Illinois: Implications for reducing nutrient loading to the Mississippi River. Environ Sci Technol 13:4126–4131. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052573n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad DA (2008) Agriculture-related trends in groundwater quality of the glacial deposits aquifer, central Wisconsin. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Jolly I, Sophocleous M, Zhang L (2007) Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: quantity versus quality. Water Resour Res 43:W03437. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheibley RW, Duff JH, Tesoriero AJ (2014) Low transient storage and uptake efficiencies in seven agricultural streams: implications for nutrient demand. J Environ Qual 43:1980–1990. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.01.0034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoda ME, Sprague LA, Murphy JC, Riskin ML (2019) Water-quality trends in U.S. rivers, 2002 to 2012: Relations to levels of concern. Sci Total Environ 650:2314–2324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon KS, Townsend CR, Biggs BJF, Bowden WB (2005) Temporal variation of N and P uptake in 2 New Zealand streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 24:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GL (2018) Modelling palaeoecological time series using generalised additive models. Front Ecol Evol 6:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague LA, Hirsch RM, Aulenbach BT (2011) Nitrate in the Mississippi River and its tributaries, 1980 to 2008: are we making progress? Environ Sci Technol 45:7209–7216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Maxted JT (2008) Changes in the dissolved nitrogen pool across land cover gradients in Wisconsin streams. Ecol Appl 18:1579–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Likens GE (2006) The effects of sampling frequency on estimates of dissolved silica export by streams: the role of hydrological variability and concentration-discharge relationships. Water Resour Res 42:W07415. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Drover DR, Eggert SL, Muldoon MA (2011a) Nitrate retention in a sand plains stream and the importance of groundwater discharge. Biogeochemistry 103:91–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Bartsch LA, Richardson WB, Strauss EA (2011b) The dark side of the hyporheic zone: depth profiles of nitrogen and its processing in stream sediments. Freshw Biol 56:2021–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02632.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Bartsch LA (2012) Nitrate removal in deep sediments of a nitrogen-rich river network: a test of a conceptual model. J Geophys Res 117:G02027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Scott JT, Bartsch LA, Parr TB (2014) Particulate organic matter quality influences nitrate retention and denitrification in stream sediments: evidence from a carbon burial experiment. Biogeochemistry 119:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS (2015) Yearlong impact of buried organic carbon on nitrate retention in stream sediments. J Environ Qual 44:1711–1719. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.02.0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Scott JT, Bartsch LA (2015) Buried particulate organic carbon stimulates denitrification and nitrate retention in stream sediments at the groundwater-surface water interface. Freshw Sci 34:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Scott JT (2018) Predicting nitrate retention at the groundwater-surface water interface in sandplain streams. J Geophys Res 123:2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzer RS, Strauss EA, Coulibaly M (2017) Assessing the importance of seepage and springs to nitrate flux in a stream network in the Wisconsin sand plains. Hydrol Process 31:2016–2028. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart RJ, Wollheim WM, Gooseff MN, Briggs MA, Jacobs JM, Peterson BJ, Hopkinson CS (2011) Separation of river network–scale nitrogen removal among the main channel and two transient storage compartments. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesoriero AJ, Duff JH, Saad DA, Spahr NE, Wolock DM (2013) Vulnerability of streams to legacy nitrate sources. Environ Sci Technol 47:3623–3629. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305026x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesoriero AJ, Terziotti S, Abrams DB (2015) Predicting redox conditions in groundwater at a regional scale. Environ Sci Technol 49:9657–9664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valett HM, Morrice JA, Dahm CN, Campana ME (1996) Parent lithology, surface-groundwater exchange, and nitrate retention in headwater streams. Limnol Oceanogr 41:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valett HM, Thomas SA, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Dahm CN, Fellows CS, Crenshaw CL, Peterson CG (2008) Endogenous and exogenous control of ecosystem function: N cycling in headwater streams. Ecology 89:3515–3527. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1003.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavrus SJ, Behnke RJ (2014) A comparison of projected future precipitation in Wisconsin using global and downscaled climate model simulations: implications for public health. Int J Climatol 34:3106–3124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller D, Marti E, Riera JL (2009) Nitrate retention and removal in Mediterranean streams bordered by contrasting land uses: a 15N tracer study. Biogeosciences 6:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schiller D, Bernal S, Marti E (2011) Technical note: a comparison of two empirical approaches to estimate in-stream net nutrient uptake. Biogeosciences 8:875–882. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-875-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim WM, Harms TK, Peterson BJ, Morkeski K, Hopkinson CS, Stewart RJ, Goosef MN, Briggs MA (2014) Nitrate uptake dynamics of surface transient storage in stream channels and fluvial wetlands. Biogeochemistry 120:239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim WM, Bernal S, Burns DA, Czuba JA, Driscoll CT, Hensley RT, Hosen JD, Inamdar S, Kaushall SS et al (2018) River network saturation concept: factors influencing the balance of biogeochemical supply and demand of river networks. Biogeochemistry 141:503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2017) Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (2nd edition), 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Ch

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnetske JP, Haggerty R, Wondzell SM, Bokil VA, González-Pinzón R (2012) Coupled transport and reaction kinetics control the nitrate source-sink function of hyporheic zones. Water Resour Res 48:W11508

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnetske JP, Haggerty R, Wondzell SM (2015) Coupling multiscale observations to evaluate hyporheic nitrate removal at the reach scale. Freshw Sci 34:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the numerous students at University of Wisconsin Oshkosh who provided assistance with the study reported here including Damion Drover, Sarah Gorsuch, Danielle Heider, Courtney Heling, Kyle Kettner, Mike Louison, Samantha Mand, Miranda Quist and Mike Shupryt. Funding was provided by the United States Forest Service, the University of Wisconsin Water Resources Institute, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the National Science Foundation, Trout Unlimited and the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Faculty Development Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All of the authors made substantial contributions to the manuscript. RS designed and implemented the study, led the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. TP led the time series modelling and co-wrote the manuscript. MC led the GIS modeling and land use analysis and co-wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert S. Stelzer.

Additional information

Handling Editor: James Sickman.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 2233 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stelzer, R.S., Parr, T.B. & Coulibaly, M. A ten year record of nitrate retention and solute trends in a Wisconsin sand plains stream: temporal variation at multiple scales. Biogeochemistry 147, 125–147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-019-00631-z

Keywords

Navigation