SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

Title:	Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study
Source:	Science [0036-8075] Couzin Frankel, J yr:2013

Basic

Sorry, no full text available...

Please use the document delivery service (see below)

Holding information

Holdings in library search engine ALBERT

Document delivery

Request document via Library/Bibliothek

Users interested in this article also expressed an interest in the following:
description	1.	WALSH, G. "Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial." The British journal of psychiatry 176.JAN. (2000): 47-51.
description	2.	Curry, Mary J. "AILA ReN Colloquium: Current research on global scholarly publishing: Peer review, writing, and pedagogies." International journal of applied linguistics 24.1 (2014): 144-146.
description	3.	Couzin Frankel, J. "Mysteries of development. How does fetal environment influence later health?" Science 340.6137 (2013): 1160-1.
description	4.	Cullen, David J. J. "Consistency between Peer Reviewers for a Clinical Specialty Journal." Academic medicine 67.12 (1992): 856-59.
description	5.	O'Driscoll, S W. "Anonymous peer review?" Canadian Journal of Surgery 40.4 (1997): 315-315.
description	6.	Pollastro, Alexandria N. "Doing Peer Review and Revising Writing Assignments Enhance Undergraduates' Writing Skills and Perceived Scientific Literacy." Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2014. 435-436.
description	7.	Loewenthal, L. "Study links iodine deficiency in pregnancy with poor cognitive outcomes in children." BMJ. British medical journal 346.23 (2013).
description	8.	Reynolds, Rebecca M. "What is the evidence in humans that DNA methylation changes link events in utero and later life disease?" Clinical endocrinology 78.6 (2013): 814-822.
description	9.	Sfakianaki, Anna K. "Prenatal vitamins : help or hype?" Contemporary ob/gyn 57.11 (2012): 26-37.
description	10.	Gruslin, A. "Significance of IGFBP-4 in the development of fetal growth restriction." The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 97.8 (2012): 1429-39.
description	11.	Mitchell, R. "Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments?" Social science & medicine 91 (2012): 130-134.
description	12.	Suzuki, W. "Themes in SLA Research: AILA Review, Volume 19 (review)." The Canadian modern language review 64.3 (2008): 528-530.
description	13.	Griffiths, P. "Peer review—Beyond the call of duty?" International journal of nursing studies 48.1 (2011): 1-2.
description	14.	Smith, R. "Opening up BMJ peer review." BMJ. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.) 318.7175 (1999): 4-.
description	15.	Abbasi. "JRSM introduces open peer review." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99.8 (2006): 379-.
description	16.	Bornmann, L. "The effectiveness of the peer review process: Inter-referee agreement and predictive validity of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte chemie." Angewandte Chemie (International ed.) 47.38 (2008): 7173-7178.
description	17.	Black, N.. "What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?" JAMA 280.3 (1998): 231-233.
description	18.	Drazen, Jeffrey M M. "Grants, politics, and the NIH." The New England journal of medicine 349.23 (2004): 2259-61.
description	19.	Kim, Yeon S. "Relationship between Physical Activity and General Mental Health." Preventive medicine 55.5 (2012): 458-463.
description	20.	Pasanen, Tytti P. "The Relationship between Perceived Health and Physical Activity Indoors, Outdoors in Built Environments, and Outdoors in Nature." Applied psychology. Health and well-being 6.3 (2014): 324-8.