Advertisement
No access
Report

Global Analysis of Cdk1 Substrate Phosphorylation Sites Provides Insights into Evolution

Science
25 Sep 2009
Vol 325, Issue 5948
pp. 1682-1686

Cataloging Kinase Targets

Protein phosphorylation is a central mechanism in the control of many biological processes (see the Perspective by Collins). It remains a challenge to determine the complete range of substrates and phosphorylation sites altered by a kinase like cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1), which controls cell division in yeast. Holt et al. (p. 1682) engineered a strain of yeast to express a modified Cdk1 molecule that could be inhibited by a specific small-molecule inhibitor. The range of Cdk1-dependent phosphorylation was assessed by quantitative mass spectrometry, which revealed many previously uncharacterized substrates for Cdk1. In addition to phosphorylation on serine and threonine residues, which appears to be evolutionarily ancient, tyrosine phosphorylation occurs primarily in multicellular organisms. Tan et al. (p. 1686, published online 9 July) compared the overall presence of tyrosine residues in human proteins (which are frequently phosphorylated) and in yeast proteins (which are not). Loss of tyrosine residues has occurred during evolution, presumably to reduce adventitious tyrosine phosphorylation.

Abstract

To explore the mechanisms and evolution of cell-cycle control, we analyzed the position and conservation of large numbers of phosphorylation sites for the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We combined specific chemical inhibition of Cdk1 with quantitative mass spectrometry to identify the positions of 547 phosphorylation sites on 308 Cdk1 substrates in vivo. Comparisons of these substrates with orthologs throughout the ascomycete lineage revealed that the position of most phosphorylation sites is not conserved in evolution; instead, clusters of sites shift position in rapidly evolving disordered regions. We propose that the regulation of protein function by phosphorylation often depends on simple nonspecific mechanisms that disrupt or enhance protein-protein interactions. The gain or loss of phosphorylation sites in rapidly evolving regions could facilitate the evolution of kinase-signaling circuits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (1172867_datasets_s1_s2.zip)
File (holt-som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
D. O. Morgan, The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control (New Science Press, London, 2007).
2
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science online.
3
Bishop A. C., et al., Nature 407, 395 (2000).
4
Ubersax J. A., et al., Nature 425, 859 (2003).
5
Strickfaden S. C., et al., Cell 128, 519 (2007).
6
Serber Z., Ferrell J. E., ., Cell 128, 441 (2007).
7
Yaffe M. B., Elia A. E., Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 131 (2001).
8
Pawson T., Gish G. D., Nash P., Trends Cell Biol. 11, 504 (2001).
9
Iakoucheva L. M., et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1037 (2004).
10
Tuch B. B., Galgoczy D. J., Hernday A. D., Li H., Johnson A. D., PLoS Biol. 6, e38 (2008).
11
Edgar R. C., Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792 (2004).
12
Kakiuchi K., et al., Biochemistry 46, 7781 (2007).
13
Bridges D., Moorhead G. B., Sci. STKE 2005, re10 (2005).
14
Moses A. M., Heriche J. K., Durbin R., Genome Biol. 8, R23 (2007).
15
Moses A. M., Liku M. E., Li J. J., Durbin R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 17713 (2007).
16
Drury L. S., Diffley J. F., Curr. Biol. 19, 530 (2009).
17
Holt L. J., Hutti J. E., Cantley L. C., Morgan D. O., Mol. Cell 25, 689 (2007).
18
Wray G. A., et al., Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1377 (2003).
19
S. B. Carroll, J. K. Grenier, S. D. Weatherbee, From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (Blackwell, Molden, MA, 2005).
20
Tuch B. B., Li H., Johnson A. D., Science 319, 1797 (2008).
21
Ghaemmaghami S., et al., Nature 425, 737 (2003).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 325 | Issue 5948
25 September 2009

Submission history

Received: 27 February 2009
Accepted: 15 July 2009
Published in print: 25 September 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Feldman, R. Fletterick, M. Jacobson, H. Li, M. Matyskiela, P. O’Farrell, M. Sullivan, and S. Naylor for helpful comments; A. K. Dunker, E. Garner, C. Oldfield, K. Shimizu, and T. Ishida for disorder prediction algorithms; the Broad Institute, Sanger Center, Génolevures, and the Joint Genome Institute for genome sequence data; and O. Jensen, C. Zhang, and K. Shokat for reagents. This work was supported by grants from NIH (GM50684 to D.O.M., HG3456 to S.P.G., and GM037049 to A.D.J.) and fellowships from NSF (to L.J.H. and B.B.T.).

Authors

Affiliations

Liam J. Holt*
Departments of Physiology and Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Brian B. Tuch*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Judit Villén*
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Alexander D. Johnson
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Steven P. Gygi [email protected]
Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
David O. Morgan [email protected]
Departments of Physiology and Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] (S.P.G.); [email protected] (D.O.M.)

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Kinase Inhibitors Involved in the Regulation of Autophagy: Molecular Concepts and Clinical Implications, Current Medicinal Chemistry, 30, 13, (1502-1528), (2023).https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867329666220117114306
    Crossref
  2. Multisite Phosphorylation of the Sum1 Transcriptional Repressor by S-Phase Kinases Controls Exit from Meiotic Prophase in Yeast, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 34, 12, (2249-2263), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01413-13
    Crossref
  3. 2-Deoxyglucose Impairs Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth by Stimulating Snf1-Regulated and α-Arrestin-Mediated Trafficking of Hexose Transporters 1 and 3 , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 35, 6, (939-955), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01183-14
    Crossref
  4. Reciprocal Phosphorylation of Yeast Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases in Adaptation to Distinct Types of Stress, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 32, 22, (4705-4717), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00897-12
    Crossref
  5. Growth-Regulated Hsp70 Phosphorylation Regulates Stress Responses and Prion Maintenance, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 40, 12, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00628-19
    Crossref
  6. TOR Complex 2-Regulated Protein Kinase Fpk1 Stimulates Endocytosis via Inhibition of Ark1/Prk1-Related Protein Kinase Akl1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 37, 7, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00627-16
    Crossref
  7. Plk1 Phosphorylates Sgt1 at the Kinetochores To Promote Timely Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 32, 19, (4053-4067), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00516-12
    Crossref
  8. Mitotic Exit Control of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ndr/LATS Kinase Cbk1 Regulates Daughter Cell Separation after Cytokinesis , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 31, 4, (721-735), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00403-10
    Crossref
  9. Function of the MYND Domain and C-Terminal Region in Regulating the Subcellular Localization and Catalytic Activity of the SMYD Family Lysine Methyltransferase Set5, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 40, 2, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00341-19
    Crossref
  10. Yeast Sphingolipid Phospholipase Gene ISC1 Regulates the Spindle Checkpoint by a CDC55 -Dependent Mechanism , Molecular and Cellular Biology, 40, 12, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00340-19
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media