SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

Title:	Metrics: don't dismiss journals with a low impact factor
Source:	Nature [0028-0836] Fitzsimmons, J M yr:2010

Basic

Full text

Full text available via Nature

Year:

Volume:

Issue:

Start Page:

Document delivery

Request document via Library/Bibliothek

Users interested in this article also expressed an interest in the following:
description	1.	Dimitrov, Jordan D. "Metrics: journal's impact factor skewed by a single paper." Nature 466.7303 (2010): 179-179.
description	2.	Switt, J. "What Does the Journal's Impact Factor Mean to You?" Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111.1 (2011): 41-44.
description	3.	Jones, A W W. "Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean?" Forensic science international 133.1-2 (2003): 1-8.
description	4.	Cintas, P. "Metrics: include refereeing as part of performance rating." Nature 466.7303 (2010): 179-179.
description	5.	Lippi, G. "The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly." Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 47.12 (2009): 1585-6.
description	6.	Campanario, Juan M. "Self‐citations that contribute to the journal impact factor: An investment‐benefit‐yield analysis." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (2010): 2575-2580.
description	7.	Robertson, J. "Forensic science, an enabler or dis-enabler for criminal investigation?" Australian journal of forensic sciences 44.1 (2012): 83-91.
description	8.	Perfetti, B. "Irrelevant Features of a Stimulus Can Either Facilitate or Disrupt Performance in a Working Memory Task: The Role of Fluid Intelligence." PLoS ONE 6.10 (2011): 1-9.
description	9.	Sachs, H. "Testing for drugs in hair-Critical review of chromatographic procedures since 1992." Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical applications (1998): 147-.
description	10.	Lev-Yadun, S. "A gradual peer-review process." Science 322.5901 (2008): 528-528.
description	11.	Leff, D. "Making an impact: The rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality." Journal of the American Dietetic Association 105.1 (2005): 29-30.
description	12.	Landy, James L. J. "Performance rating." Psychological bulletin 87.1 (1980): 72-107.
description	13.	Cronin, B. "Canonicity." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64.11 (2013): 2189-2190.
description	14.	Brumfiel, G. "Rethink on review leaves researchers out in the cold." Nature 435.7038 (2005): 5-.
description	15.	Garfield, E. "Impact factors, and why they won't go away." Nature 411.6837 (2001): 522-522.
description	16.	Franceschet, M. "Ten good reasons to use the Eigenfactor metrics." Information processing & management 46.5 (2010): 555-558.
description	17.	Braun, T. "How to improve the use of metrics." Nature 465.7300 (2010): 870-872.
description	18.	Sulsky, L. "Rating Formats and Rater Training Redux: A Context-Specific Approach for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Performance Management." Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 2009. 227-240.
description	19.	Kanthraj GR, K. "Journal impact factor." Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology 72.4 (2006): 322-5.
description	20.	Hye-Kyung Chung, H. "Evaluating Academic Journals using Impact Factor and Local Citation Score." Journal of academic librarianship 33.3 (2007): 393-402.