Corrected mean-field models for spatially dependent advection-diffusion-reaction phenomena

Matthew J. Simpson and Ruth E. Baker
Phys. Rev. E 83, 051922 – Published 26 May 2011

Abstract

In the exclusion-process literature, mean-field models are often derived by assuming that the occupancy status of lattice sites is independent. Although this assumption is questionable, it is the foundation of many mean-field models. In this work we develop methods to relax the independence assumption for a range of discrete exclusion-process-based mechanisms motivated by applications from cell biology. Previous investigations that focused on relaxing the independence assumption have been limited to studying initially uniform populations and ignored any spatial variations. By ignoring spatial variations these previous studies were greatly simplified due to translational invariance of the lattice. These previous corrected mean-field models could not be applied to many important problems in cell biology such as invasion waves of cells that are characterized by moving fronts. Here we propose generalized methods that relax the independence assumption for spatially inhomogeneous problems, leading to corrected mean-field descriptions of a range of exclusion-process-based models that incorporate (i) unbiased motility, (ii) biased motility, and (iii) unbiased motility with agent birth and death processes. The corrected mean-field models derived here are applicable to spatially variable processes including invasion wave-type problems. We show that there can be large deviations between simulation data and traditional mean-field models based on invoking the independence assumption. Furthermore, we show that the corrected mean-field models give an improved match to the simulation data in all cases considered.

    • Received 20 January 2011

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.051922

    ©2011 American Physical Society

    Authors & Affiliations

    Matthew J. Simpson1,2 and Ruth E. Baker3

    • 1Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
    • 2Tissue Repair and Regeneration Program, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
    • 3Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles’, Oxford, OX1 3LB, United Kingdom

    Article Text (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    References (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand
    Issue

    Vol. 83, Iss. 5 — May 2011

    Reuse & Permissions
    Access Options
    Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

    Authorization Required


    ×
    ×

    Images

    ×

    Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

    Log In

    Cancel
    ×

    Search


    Article Lookup

    Paste a citation or DOI

    Enter a citation
    ×