Measurements of the velocity distribution for granular flow in a Couette cell

H. T. Fabich, T. I. Brox, D. Clarke, J. D. Seymour, S. L. Codd, P. Galvosas, J. Brown, A. J. Sederman, and D. J. Holland
Phys. Rev. E 98, 062901 – Published 5 December 2018

Abstract

In this paper, magnetic resonance velocimetry is used to measure the spatially resolved velocity and velocity fluctuations for granular flow in a Couette cell for four different particle sizes. The largest particles studied (dp=1.7mm) showed significant slip at the inner wall. The remaining particles showed no slip and all exhibit the same behavior in the profiles of the mean velocity and variance of velocity. The measurements demonstrate that the velocity and variance in velocity scale with the inner wall velocity U; the variance does not scale with U2. The experimental data were compared with a kinetic theory based model of granular flow and a hydrodynamic model. It was found that the shear rate scales with an exponent of 1.5–2.0 with respect to the velocity fluctuations uy2, compared with the value of 1.0 expected from kinetic theory. The difference in the exponent is consistent with the effect of collective dynamics as described by the hydrodynamic model.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 13 March 2018
  • Revised 11 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.062901

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Physical Systems
  1. Techniques
Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

H. T. Fabich1,*, T. I. Brox2, D. Clarke3, J. D. Seymour4, S. L. Codd5, P. Galvosas2, J. Brown4, A. J. Sederman1, and D. J. Holland3,†

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge CB3 0AS, England, United Kingdom
  • 2School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
  • 3Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • 4Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University, 306 Cobleigh Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA
  • 5Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Montana State University, 220 Roberts Hall, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA

  • *Now at ABQMR, Inc., 2301 Yale Boulevard Southeast, Suite C-2, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA.
  • Corresponding author: daniel.holland@canterbury.ac.nz

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 98, Iss. 6 — December 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×