Reaction mechanisms of the O18+Cu63 system at near-barrier energies

E. Crema, V. A. B. Zagatto, J. M. B. Shorto, B. Paes, J. Lubian, R. F. Simões, D. S. Monteiro, J. F. P. Huiza, N. Added, M. C. Morais, and P. R. S. Gomes
Phys. Rev. C 98, 044614 – Published 17 October 2018

Abstract

A precise quasielastic excitation function for the O18+Cu63 system has been measured at energies around the Coulomb barrier at θLAB=161. The corresponding quasielastic barrier distribution has been derived. Two-neutron-, one-proton-, and α-transfer-excitation functions have also been measured at the same energies and angle. Coupled reaction channels calculations were performed to describe the experimental data. Large-scale shell-model calculations were performed to derive most of the spectroscopic amplitudes. No surface imaginary potential was necessary for the interaction potential because almost all relevant reaction channels were explicitly included in the calculation. The theoretical results were compared to the experimental quasielastic barrier distribution and a very good agreement was achieved. The comparison of the coupled reaction channel calculations and data has put in evidence several important details of the reaction mechanism of the O18+Cu63 system. The collectivity of the Cu63 nucleus has important contribution to the reaction mechanism of this system, mainly due to its first 5/2+ and 7/2+ states. It was also observed a striking influence on the reaction dynamics of the O18(2+) state, the two-neutron transfer and the reorientation of the target ground-state spin. The best agreement to data was achieved when the nuclear matter diffuseness for the O18 was assumed equal to 0.60 fm, value that we have derived in a previous paper and that is 10% greater than the O16 diffuseness. Another significant result was that the two-neutron transfer process is much more relevant than the one-neutron-transfer process, which suggests that the pairing correlation could play an important role in the transfer process of this system.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 6 June 2018
  • Revised 27 August 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044614

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

E. Crema1,*, V. A. B. Zagatto2, J. M. B. Shorto3, B. Paes2, J. Lubian2, R. F. Simões1, D. S. Monteiro4,5, J. F. P. Huiza6, N. Added1, M. C. Morais7, and P. R. S. Gomes2,†

  • 1Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, 05315-970 São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, 24210-340, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 3Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, IPEN/CNEN, 05508-000, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • 4ILACVN, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino Americana, 85866-000, Foz do Igaçu, PR, Brazil
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, 46556, South Bend, Indiana, USA
  • 6Universidade Estatual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil
  • 7INFES, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Santo Antônio de Pádua, Rio de Janeiro 28470-000, Brazil

  • *crema@if.usp.br
  • Deceased.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 98, Iss. 4 — October 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×