Electronic structure of FeO, γFe2O3, and Fe3O4 epitaxial films using high-energy spectroscopies

Juan Rubio-Zuazo, Ashish Chainani, Munetaka Taguchi, Daniel Malterre, Aida Serrano, and German R. Castro
Phys. Rev. B 97, 235148 – Published 27 June 2018

Abstract

We study the electronic structure of well-characterized epitaxial films of FeO (wustite), γFe2O3 (maghemite), and Fe3O4 (magnetite) using hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES), x-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES), and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). We carry out HAXPES with incident photon energies of 12 and 15 keV in order to probe the bulk-sensitive Fe 1s and Fe 2p core level spectra. Fe K-edge XANES is used to characterize and confirm the Fe valence states of FeO, γFe2O3, and Fe3O4 films. EELS is used to identify the bulk plasmon loss features. A comparison of HAXPES results with model calculations for an MO6 cluster provides us with microscopic electronic structure parameters such as the onsite Coulomb energy Udd, the charge-transfer energy Δ, and the metal-ligand hybridization strength V. The results also provide estimates for the ground-state and final-state contributions in terms of the dn, dn+1L̲1, and dn+2L̲2 configurations. Both FeO and γFe2O3 can be described as charge-transfer insulators in the Zaanen-Sawatzky-Allen picture with Udd>Δ, consistent with earlier work. However, the MO6 cluster calculations do not reproduce an extra satellite observed in Fe 1s spectra of γFe2O3 and Fe3O4. Based on simplified calculations using an M2O7 cluster with renormalized parameters, it is suggested that nonlocal screening plays an important role in explaining the two satellites observed in the Fe 1s core level HAXPES spectra of γFe2O3 and Fe3O4.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 26 March 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235148

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Juan Rubio-Zuazo1,2, Ashish Chainani3,4, Munetaka Taguchi3,5, Daniel Malterre6, Aida Serrano1,2, and German R. Castro1,2

  • 1Spanish CRG BM25-SpLine Beamline at the ESRF, 71 avenue des Martyrs 38000 Grenoble, France and ESRF-The European Synchrotron CS 40220, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
  • 2Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid-ICMM/CSIC, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
  • 3RIKEN SPring-8 Center, 1-1-1 Sayo-cho, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan
  • 4Condensed Matter Physics Group, National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • 5Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST), Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan
  • 6Institut Jean Lamour, Universite de Lorraine, UMR 7198 CNRS, BP 70239, 54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 23 — 15 June 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×