Extension of nanoconfined DNA: Quantitative comparison between experiment and theory

V. Iarko, E. Werner, L. K. Nyberg, V. Müller, J. Fritzsche, T. Ambjörnsson, J. P. Beech, J. O. Tegenfeldt, K. Mehlig, F. Westerlund, and B. Mehlig
Phys. Rev. E 92, 062701 – Published 2 December 2015

Abstract

The extension of DNA confined to nanochannels has been studied intensively and in detail. However, quantitative comparisons between experiments and model calculations are difficult because most theoretical predictions involve undetermined prefactors, and because the model parameters (contour length, Kuhn length, effective width) are difficult to compute reliably, leading to substantial uncertainties. Here we use a recent asymptotically exact theory for the DNA extension in the “extended de Gennes regime” that allows us to compare experimental results with theory. For this purpose, we performed experiments measuring the mean DNA extension and its standard deviation while varying the channel geometry, dye intercalation ratio, and ionic strength of the buffer. The experimental results agree very well with theory at high ionic strengths, indicating that the model parameters are reliable. At low ionic strengths, the agreement is less good. We discuss possible reasons. In principle, our approach allows us to measure the Kuhn length and the effective width of a single DNA molecule and more generally of semiflexible polymers in solution.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 5 June 2015
  • Revised 2 November 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062701

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

V. Iarko1, E. Werner1, L. K. Nyberg2, V. Müller2, J. Fritzsche3, T. Ambjörnsson4, J. P. Beech5, J. O. Tegenfeldt5,6, K. Mehlig7, F. Westerlund2, and B. Mehlig1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Gothenburg, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
  • 2Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
  • 4Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 22 100 Lund, Sweden
  • 5Department of Physics, Division of Solid State Physics, Lund University, 22 100 Lund, Sweden
  • 6NanoLund, Lund University, 22 100 Lund, Sweden
  • 7Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, 413 46 Göteborg, Sweden

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 6 — December 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×