Abstract

We present early results from the JCMT (James Clerk Maxwell Telescope) Plane Survey (JPS), which has surveyed the northern inner Galactic plane between longitudes ℓ = 7° and ℓ = 63° in the 850-μm continuum with SCUBA-2 (Submm Common-User Bolometer Array 2), as part of the JCMT Legacy Survey programme. Data from the ℓ = 30° survey region, which contains the massive-star-forming regions W43 and G29.96, are analysed after approximately 40 per cent of the observations had been completed. The pixel-to-pixel noise is found to be 19 mJy beam−1 after a smooth over the beam area, and the projected equivalent noise levels in the final survey are expected to be around 10 mJy beam−1. An initial extraction of compact sources was performed using the FellWalker method, resulting in the detection of 1029 sources above a 5σ surface-brightness threshold. The completeness limits in these data are estimated to be around 0.2 Jy beam−1 (peak flux density) and 0.8 Jy (integrated flux density) and are therefore probably already dominated by source confusion in this relatively crowded section of the survey. The flux densities of extracted compact sources are consistent with those of matching detections in the shallower APEX (Atacama Pathfinder Experiment) Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy (ATLASGAL) survey. We analyse the virial and evolutionary state of the detected clumps in the W43 star-forming complex and find that they appear younger than the Galactic-plane average.

1 INTRODUCTION

In order to obtain a predictive understanding of star formation that will be useful to all areas of astrophysics, we must identify and quantify the principal mechanisms responsible for regulating the star formation rate (SFR) and efficiency (SFE) on different spatial scales, and, potentially, those that determine the stellar initial mass function (IMF). We need to separate the effects of Galaxy-scale mechanisms, in particular the spiral-arm density waves, from local triggering by feedback due to radiation, stellar winds and H ii regions.

Until recently, the study of star formation (and especially massive star formation) has been limited by biased and incomplete samples. For example, what controls the SFE, whether the IMF is variable, or even which regions are typical and which are extreme are all unknowns. However, these questions are now solvable by using large surveys to measure the SFE and luminosity function (LF) of young stellar objects (YSOs). Using Red MSX Source (RMS) survey data (Lumsden et al. 2013), Moore et al. (2012) have found that around 70 per cent of the increase in SFR density associated with spiral arms in the inner Galaxy is due to source crowding, rather than any physical effect of the arms on the star formation process. The remainder could be due to increases in SFE or in the mean luminosity of massive YSOs (i.e. a flattening of the MYSO LF). However it might also be the result of residual bias in the source samples due to patchy star formation within spiral arms (Urquhart et al. 2014a). Moore et al. (2012) also show evidence that the mean molecular cloud mass decreases with Galactocentric radius, implying a significant change in the star-forming environment with Galactic radius.

The RMS survey is also beginning to unravel the evolutionary time-scales of MYSOs. Mottram et al. (2011) find that the accretion phase of MYSOs has a duration ranging from 4 × 105 yr for objects with luminosities of 104 L to ∼7 × 104 yr at for those with L = 105 L. At luminosities above 105 L the accretion time-scales for MYSOs become comparable to the Kelvin–Helmholtz time. Davies et al. (2011) suggest that these time-scales are most consistent with accretion rates predicted by turbulent core and competitive accretion models (e.g. Bonnell & Bate 2006).

Similarly, there has been recent progress on constraining the role of spiral arms in affecting the efficiency of forming dense, star-forming clumps out of the larger molecular clouds (the clump formation efficiency, or CFE). Using data from the Galactic Ring Survey (GRS; Jackson et al. 2006) and the Bolocam Galactic Plane Survey (BGPS; Aguirre et al. 2011), in the range ℓ = 37| $_{.}^{\circ}$|8 to 42| $_{.}^{\circ}$|5, Eden et al. (2013) found no difference in the CFE between the arm and interarm regions. This implies that the increased SFR in Galactic spiral arms arises simply from the presence of greater amounts of gas in the arms, and is not due to an increase in the efficiency of forming dense clumps.

The key data required in such investigations are provided by large-scale surveys of the Galactic plane (GP) in tracers of the cool, dense, molecular gas which forms the initial conditions for star formation. Of particular importance are surveys in rotational emission lines from the isotopologues of CO and continuum emission in the far-infrared and submillimetre (submm) bands from warm and cold dust mixed with the gas. The thermal submm continuum emission from cool and cold dust is associated with a variety of early phases of star formation and is reliably optically thin, giving direct measurements of column density if it is assumed that gas and dust are well mixed. Large-area surveys at these wavelengths therefore provide a census of current and incipient star formation activity. Unbiased, blind surveys are required to demonstrate both where star formation is present and where it is absent.

A number of major continuum surveys of the GP have been completed or are in progress, which will allow studies such as those above to be made in an unbiased fashion, with more detail, and over Galactic scales. These surveys hold out the promise of providing data that will facilitate major steps forward in the study of star formation by providing spectral-energy-distribution and luminosity information for complete samples of star-forming regions and individual young stellar objects, large enough to bin by luminosity, evolutionary stage and environment. Among these are: Hi-GAL (Molinari et al. 2010a,b) – an open-time Key Program of the Herschel Space Observatory, which carried out a five-band photometric imaging survey at 70, 160, 250, 350 and 500 Δb ≃ 2° wide strip of the entire Galactic plane, following the Galactic warp, and ATLASGAL (Schuller et al. 2009), the first systematic survey of the inner Galactic plane at 870 μm, covering 280° < ℓ < 60° and |b| < 1| $_{.}^{\circ}$|5 over most of its range. This survey was carried out using the LABOCA instrument at the APEX telescope (Siringo et al. 2009). CORNISH (Hoare et al. 2012) has used the Very Large Array to map the northern Galactic plane at 5 GHz in the range ℓ = 10°–60° and at latitudes of |b| < 1°. GLIMPSE (Benjamin et al. 2003; Churchwell et al. 2009) surveyed a range of Galactic latitude and longitude at wavelengths of 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0 μm. Specifically, |ℓ| = 10°–65° at |b| < 1°, expanding to |b| < 2° in the inner |ℓ| = 0°–5°, and then nine selected strips extended in latitude to ±3° (±4° if they were within 2° of the Galactic Centre).

In this paper, we describe early results from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) Galactic Plane Survey (JPS), part of the JCMT Legacy Survey programme (Chrysostomou 2010). The results presented are from a region of the survey near Galactic longitudes of ℓ = 30°, which is well enough studied so that consistency checks can be made and where the source density is high and the detection sensitivity is near to the confusion limit and unlikely to be much improved upon in the final product. JPS was allocated 450 h in JCMT weather band 3 (0.08 ≤ τ225 GHz ≤ 0.12) to survey the region 7° ≤ ℓ ≤ 63°, | b | ≤ 1° in the 850-μm continuum. Observations began in 2012 June and were completed in late 2014. The JPS Consortium consists of astronomers affiliated at time of joining to one of the three pre-2013 JCMT partner countries: UK, Canada and the Netherlands. JPS is part of a coordinated plan for mapping the GP in the submm continuum with JCMT, which involves a second JCMT/SCUBA-2 Legacy-survey project, the SCUBA-2 Ambitious Sky Survey (SASSy; Thompson et al., in preparation). SASSy will observe the outer GP region 120° < ℓ < 240°; | b | ≤ 2| $_{.}^{\circ}$|5 at 850 μm with sensitivity 30–40 mJy beam−1 rms. The SASSy Perseus extension will also map longitudes 60° < ℓ < 120°, completing the SCUBA-2 coverage of the GP visible from JCMT to an approximately constant average mass sensitivity. JPS covers the same area as the ATLASGAL survey (Schuller et al. 2009) and BGPS (Aguirre et al. 2011) but will be several times deeper.

The goal of the JPS is to produce a census of, principally, massive star formation across a large fraction of the Galaxy, complete to a mass limit of the order of 100 M (depending on assumed temperature and emissivity values) at a distance of ∼20 kpc. Aside from the legacy value of the data, the immediate science aims are to investigate the earliest stages of the evolutionary sequence of massive protostars and pre-stellar objects, the variation of SFE with location in the Galaxy and the effect of environment and feedback on this and the mass distribution of dense, star-forming clumps. A public release of JPS data will accompany a future paper describing the complete survey.

2 OBSERVING STRATEGY

JPS uses the wide-field submm-band bolometer camera SCUBA-2 (the Submm Common-User Bolometer Array 2; Holland et al. 2013) in the 850-μm band at a spatial resolution of 14.5 arcsec.

JPS samples the region of the inner GP within the longitude range 7° < ℓ < 63° and latitude | b | ≤ 0| $_{.}^{\circ}$|8, an area coincident with that of the northern GLIMPSE survey (Benjamin et al. 2003, also MIPSGAL, Carey et al. 2009), and CORNISH north (Hoare et al. 2012; Purcell et al. 2013). The strategy is to map six large, regularly spaced fields within this area, centred at intervals of 10° from ℓ = 10° (Fig. 1) with a target rms sensitivity of ∼10 mJy beam−1 at 850 μm. Each of the fields covers approximately 5° in longitude and 1| $_{.}^{\circ}$|7 in latitude. This strategy was developed in response to the re-scoping of the entire JCMT Legacy Survey project that took place in 2011. The choice of regularly spaced but spatially limited target fields allows a significant increase in depth over existing surveys while preserving the goal of producing a relatively unbiased survey and still taking in several significant features of Galactic structure, particularly the tangent and origin of the Scutum spiral arm at ℓ = 30° and the Sagittarius-arm tangent at l = 50°. Fig. 2 shows the extent of JPS in the context of several other key submm surveys.

Figure 1.

JPS projected area coverage on the sky (green contours) overlaid on the Planck dust opacity map (colour scale; Planck Collaboration XI 2014). The apparent size difference between the six JPS patches is due to the tangent projection of the Galactic coordinate system. The zero of declination passes through ℓ ≃ 32| $_{.}^{\circ}$|9. The axis scale is degrees.

Figure 2.

The area of the Galaxy covered by JPS (green segments). Also shown, for comparison, is the longitude coverage of ATLASGAL (yellow), BGPS (blue) and SASSy (pink). The background image is the sketch of the Milky Way by Robert Hurt of the Spitzer Science Center, made in collaboration with Robert Benjamin.

The observing modes developed for SCUBA-2 include large-area mapping modes known as rotating pong patterns in which the telescope tracks across a square area, filling it in by notionally bouncing off the boundary of this area, in the manner of the eponymous vintage video game. Once a pattern is complete the map is rotated and the pattern repeated at the new angle. The combination of telescope velocity, the spacing between successive rows of the basic pattern and the number of rotations have been optimized to give the most uniform exposure-time coverage across the defined field. JPS uses the pong3600 mode (Bintley et al. 2014), with eight rotations and a telescope scan speed of 600 arcsec s−1 to produce a one-degree circular area of consistent exposure time, to observe each tile in the survey (the actual mapped area is larger than this). The total time required for each observation is generally between 40 and 45 min.

The survey target areas are sampled using a regular grid pattern of individual pong3600 tiles with minimized overlaps. Fig. 3 shows an exposure-time map of part of such a grid. The overlaps, in which the exposure time is roughly doubled, constitute about 9 per cent of the grid area. Individual pong3600s have a pixel-to-pixel rms noise of 50–80 mJy beam−1 when reduced with 4-arcsec pixels and each tile of the final survey will contain approximately seven repeats of these. As far as possible, even coverage of the whole target area was maintained as the survey progressed, in order to produce relatively uniform sensitivity at any stage.

Figure 3.

Part of the survey grid pattern consisting of overlapping 1-degree circular pong tiles. The colour scale indicates the spatial distribution of relative exposure time (in arbitrary units) assuming identical observing conditions and the same number of repeats for each tile.

The 850-μm survey data presented in this paper cover the ℓ = 30° field of the JPS and were observed between 2012 June and 2013 October. The 11 tiles making up the field were observed on average three times each. A strategy of minimum elevation limits for given atmospheric opacity bands within the allocated range was adopted, in order to minimize variations in the resulting noise in each repeated tile.

Flux calibrations, pointing and focus checks were made routinely during each observing session with observations of isolated observatory standard point sources (Dempsey et al. 2013b). The flux calibrations were typically found to be repeatable to within 5 per cent. The pointing accuracy is typically less than 5 arcsec rms.

SCUBA-2 observes the 850 and 450-μm bands simultaneously but the assigned weather band for JPS observations ensures high sky opacity (τ ≃ 1.7 to 2.7 in weather band 3) at 450 μm. The brightest sources are detected at low sensitivity at 450 μm but the fluxes are not photometrically reliable and therefore are not currently included in the survey science data.

3 DATA REDUCTION

The data presented in this paper were reduced with the Dynamic Iterative Map-Maker (Chapin et al. 2013), available as part of the Starlinksmurf package (Jenness et al. 2011).

The raw data are first flat-fielded, converting raw DAC units into pW and then sampled to the requested pixel size, in this case 4 arcsec, cleaned of spikes and steps in the data, and finally bad data are flagged or weighted down.

The iterative part of the reduction process then begins with the signal common to all bolometers being estimated and removed. An atmospheric correction is applied and the data are filtered to remove any remaining features on scales larger than the array footprint of 480 arcsec, since these are likely to be artefacts. The remaining signal is then binned into a map of the sky using 4-arcsec pixels. At this point the map made by the previous iteration (if any) is added back in, and the total map is sampled at the position of every bolometer value to create an estimate of the astronomical component of the signal, with any residual signal attributed to noise. These noise values are used to weigh the bolometers when making maps on subsequent iterations, with each bolometer having multiple variance estimates calculated over a 15-s period. This astronomical signal is then removed from the original cleaned data, and the process is repeated iteratively starting from the modified data, until the change between maps produced by consecutive iterations is on average less than 1 per cent of the noise level.

In order to prevent the growth of low-frequency artefacts, an extra constraint is added by forcing all background pixels in the map to be zero. Background pixels are taken to be those with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) less than 3.0, plus any other contiguously attached pixels down to a SNR of 2.0. No such constraint is applied on the very last iteration, thus allowing non-zero values to appear in the background regions of the final map. This means that the background values within the final map are the result of a single iteration, while the astronomical signal has been arrived at by many iterations.

The present data have been reduced as individual pong tiles on to a 4-arcsec pixel grid and then mosaicked to construct the whole ℓ = 30° field map. Prior to creating the mosaic, noisy tile edges were removed by cropping each observation to a 40 arcmin radius. The combined map was then lightly smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with σ = 1.8 pixels (7.2 arcsec), approximating the half-width at half-maximum of the telescope beam at 850 μm. The standard observatory-determined calibration factor of 537 Jy beam−1 pW−1 was applied to the data.

4 RESULTS

Fig. 4 shows all of the reduced ℓ = 30° field data. Well-known star-forming regions W43 and G 29.96 can be identified at positions ℓ = 30.815, b = −0.057 and ℓ = 29.954, b = −0.018, respectively. Fig. 5 shows a close-up of the same data in the 1° region around W43.

Figure 4.

JPS 850-μm surface-brightness distribution in the ℓ = 30° field as of 2013 October with about 40 per cent of the data acquired. Individual circular pong tiles have been cropped at a radius of around 0| $_{.}^{\circ}$|65. The bright sources near longitudes of 30| $_{.}^{\circ}$|0 and 30| $_{.}^{\circ}$|8 are the well-known star-forming regions G29.96 and W43, respectively. The colour scale range is logarithmic from zero to 23 Jy beam−1.

Figure 5.

850-μm surface-brightness distribution in the ∼1 deg2 area around the W43 star-forming region. The data have been lightly smoothed with a σ = 7.2 arcsec Gaussian kernel, equivalent to the 850-μm JCMT beam, slightly degrading the native spatial resolution.

The distribution of all pixel values in the l = 30° field is shown in Fig. 6, along with a Gaussian fit to the distribution (−0.1 to 0.1 Jy beam−1). The rms noise in the data is estimated from the latter to be σrms = 19 mJy beam−1. It can be seen from the negative pixel values that there is a slight excess noise in the wings of the distribution above that of the assumed Gaussian. The larger excess on the positive side is due to signal from real sources. Since the data set used here consists of around 40 per cent of the eventual JPS data, the projected rms sensitivity in the complete survey, in regions where confusion is not dominant, is therefore likely to be around 12 mJy beam−1. This can be compared to the ATLASGAL rms sensitivity of 50–80 mJy.

Figure 6.

The distribution of all pixel values in the l = 30° field (black histogram) and the result of a Gaussian fit to the distribution (−0.1 to 0.1 Jy beam−1; dashed red curve). The sensitivity of the current data is estimated from the latter fit to be σrms = 19 mJy beam−1.

4.1 12CO J = 3–2 line contamination

With a central frequency of 355 GHz and half-power width around 35 GHz, the continuum bandpass at 850 μm will suffer contamination from spectral-line emission, predominantly by 12CO (J = 3–2) at 345.796 GHz (Johnstone, Boonman & van Dishoeck 2003). To quantify the degree of contamination, we reprocess the SCUBA-2 data with the CO contribution removed during the reduction.

CO data for this region were taken from the CO High Resolution Survey (COHRS; Dempsey, Thomas & Currie 2013a). COHRS has mapped the Galactic plane in 12CO (J = 3–2) in the Galactic longitude range ℓ = 10° to ℓ = 55° using the Heterodyne Array Receiver Project (HARP) instrument on the JCMT and its spatial resolution is therefore essentially identical to that of the SCUBA-2 data. COHRS only extends to Galactic latitudes b = ±0| $_{.}^{\circ}$|25 in the ℓ = 30° region, so only this central strip can be considered in this analysis.

The technique for removing the CO contamination involves running the mapmaker as described in Section 3 but with the CO map, converted to SCUBA-2 output power units, supplied as a negative fake source. This method has previously been used by Drabek et al. (2012), Hatchell et al. (2013) and Sadavoy et al. (2013) to investigate CO contamination. To convert to physical units (pW), we begin by multiplying the CO intensities (in K km s−1) by the forward-scattering and spillover efficiency (0.71) and by a molecular-line conversion factor. This factor is calculated from the atmospheric precipitable water vapour (P) and scales with opacity at 225 GHz using the following equation, described in full in Parsons et al. (in preparation):
\begin{eqnarray*} C_{850} &=& 0.574\,17 + 0.115\,089 \,P - 0.048\,470 \,P^2 + 0.010\,893 \,P^3 \nonumber\\ && - 0.000\,856 \,P^4 \, {\rm mJy\,beam}^{-1} / {\rm (K\,km\,s}^{-1}{\rm ).} \end{eqnarray*}

The final step converts the CO data from mJy beam−1 into negative pW by dividing by the standard 850-μm calibration factor (−537 000 mJy beam−1 pW−1). Once the raw data have been reduced with the CO contribution removed, the resulting map is compared to the uncorrected SCUBA-2 data, applying a mask based on a 3σ cut in the signal-to-noise map of the original reduction to both maps.

For the bulk of the data, the levels of CO contamination range from zero to ∼30 per cent (see Fig. 7) and the majority of values are only a few per cent. This is consistent with values reported by Schuller et al. (2009) who quote results from Wyrowski et al. (2006) and with those found by Drabek et al. (2012). The distribution is not random but varies coherently between and within sources, with clearly resolved gradients that are sometimes radial and sometimes longitudinal. In general, the highest levels of contamination appear towards the edges of continuum sources, where the 12CO optical depth is likely to be least. Detailed analysis of the spatial variation in CO contamination is beyond the scope of this paper and will be addressed in a future study; however, for the brightest sources with a SCUBA-2 flux between 1000 and 1500 mJy beam−1, the contamination levels have a mode of 2 per cent and do not exceed 10 per cent. It is therefore clear that the level of contamination is relatively low and unlikely to affect significantly the extracted dust column densities.

Figure 7.

Spatial distribution of the 12CO J = 3–2 emission line contamination in the region around W43. The colour scale shows the value of (S(850) − S(12CO))/S(850) and the range is from 0.7 (darkest) to 1.0 (lightest).

Since the JPS has a wider latitude range (| b | ≤ 0| $_{.}^{\circ}$|85) than COHRS, a statistical correction would be desirable where no COHRS data are available. However, we found no correlation between the level of contamination and the surface brightness in the continuum map and so such an extrapolation is unlikely to be possible.

Another potential source of contamination of the thermal dust emission at submm wavelengths is that from the free–free continuum. Obviously, this would be most severe for luminous compact H ii regions, such as those in W43. Schuller et al. (2009), using results from Motte, Schilke & Lis (2003), estimate this contribution to be less than ∼20 per cent in most cases.

4.2 Detection of compact sources

To identify compact sources within the data, we have used the FellWalker (FW; Berry 2015) source-extraction algorithm, which is part of the Starlink software package cupid (Berry et al. 2007). Berry (2015) shows that FW is robust against a wide choice of input parameters, which is not the case for Clumpfind or Gaussclumps (Watson 2010). An overview of these and other algorithms can be found in Men'shchikov et al. (2012). Like most source extraction algorithms, FW performs best when the background noise is uniformly distributed. We have therefore used the weight map produced by the data-reduction processing to estimate the rms noise distribution in the image and so produced a SNR map of the whole region. The noise in this SNR map is effectively constant, even towards the edges where the rms in the surface-brightness map increases significantly.

The SNR map was used as the initial input into FW and all sources above a specified SNR threshold were identified with the task FINDCLUMPS. The FW algorithm assigns pixels to clumps by ascending towards emission peaks from each pixel above the threshold via the steepest gradient. It then creates a mask of the input map in which pixel values either identify the source to which the pixel has been assigned or are set to a negative value if unassigned. This mask is then used as input to the task EXTRACTCLUMPS that extracts peak and integrated flux values from the original emission map for each source identified.

We set a detection threshold of 3σ and required that the source consisted of >7 pixels; this is the number of pixels we would expect above the detection threshold for an unresolved 5σ source. The sensitivity of JPS data to the extended, filamentary structures found to be ubiquitous in Herschel Hi-GAL images (Molinari et al. 2010b) has not yet been tested and so, for the purposes of this paper, we have rejected sources with aspect ratios larger than 5.

Fig. 8 displays the distribution of 850-μm surface brightness in a small subregion of the l = 30° field, around the prominent W43 star-forming region, and the sources extracted from the data by FW. Most of the sources that are identifiable by eye have been recovered, although the detection of sources below 5σ is relatively unreliable, further justifying a threshold at this level for inclusion in our preliminary compact source catalogue. The latter consists of 1029 objects and is listed in Table 1. The set of FW parameter settings used is given in Table 2.

Figure 8.

Example of the source-extraction results in a small portion of the |$\ell = 30\deg$| region. The grey-scale image shows the 850-μm emission and the red and blue ellipses show the approximate sizes and orientations of the sources above and below 5σ. The grey contours start at 3σ and increase in steps of 0.17, 0.8, 2.75, 6.81, 13.85 Jy beam−1. The green filled circle in the lower-left corner indicates the FWHM size of the JCMT beam at 850 μm.

Table 1.

The JPS ℓ = 30° preliminary compact source catalogue. The columns are as follows: (1) name derived from Galactic coordinates of the maximum intensity in the source; (2) and (3) Galactic coordinates of maximum intensity in the catalogue source; (4) and (5) Galactic coordinates of emission centroid; (6)–(8) semimajor and semiminor size and source position angle measured anticlockwise from Galactic north; (9) effective radius of source, i.e. |$R_{\rm eff}=\sqrt{\left(A/\pi \right)}$|⁠, where A is the area of the source above the threshold; (10)–(13) peak and integrated flux densities and their associated uncertainties; (14) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

NamemaxbmaxbσmajσminPAReffSpeakΔSpeakSintΔSintSNR
(°)(°)(°)(°)(″)(″)(°)(″)(Jy beam−1)(Jy)
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
G026.830−00.20826.830−0.20826.830−0.20676259160.380.080.640.135.6
G026.865−00.27626.865−0.27626.867−0.2761211112260.360.061.000.176.8
G026.957−00.07726.957−0.07726.956−0.076108224260.770.081.640.1715.2
G026.960−00.30926.960−0.30926.962−0.308147177230.200.040.670.145.0
G027.000−00.29827.000−0.29827.001−0.2972411167380.690.071.890.2015.1
G027.011−00.04027.011−0.04027.012−0.0391111151300.470.061.150.1410.4
G027.019−00.16627.019−0.16627.021−0.167136192210.200.040.510.115.1
G027.037−00.17127.037−0.17127.035−0.1652212269310.220.040.980.195.6
G027.066+00.01327.066+0.01327.078+0.0153216163440.250.051.760.355.4
G027.086−00.56427.086−0.56427.086−0.56398149220.390.050.920.138.7
G027.100−00.55927.100−0.55927.098−0.557178186300.570.061.480.1712.9
G027.173−00.00827.173−0.00827.173−0.0051410210270.270.050.830.146.5
G027.178−00.10527.178−0.10527.176−0.105129166270.430.061.290.179.4
G027.186−00.08227.186−0.08227.186−0.0792916268553.070.256.190.5067.8
G027.187−00.14827.187−0.14827.187−0.1482011213330.230.051.150.235.6
G027.207−00.10027.207−0.10027.208−0.0981615214350.440.062.090.289.6
G027.221+00.13627.221+0.13627.221+0.136168188300.840.091.700.1814.3
G027.248+00.10827.248+0.10827.245+0.1081614189340.530.071.640.2110.4
G027.256+00.13527.256+0.13527.255+0.136107130220.680.081.340.1511.9
G027.279+00.14527.279+0.14527.272+0.1473012193461.660.156.060.5328.5
NamemaxbmaxbσmajσminPAReffSpeakΔSpeakSintΔSintSNR
(°)(°)(°)(°)(″)(″)(°)(″)(Jy beam−1)(Jy)
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
G026.830−00.20826.830−0.20826.830−0.20676259160.380.080.640.135.6
G026.865−00.27626.865−0.27626.867−0.2761211112260.360.061.000.176.8
G026.957−00.07726.957−0.07726.956−0.076108224260.770.081.640.1715.2
G026.960−00.30926.960−0.30926.962−0.308147177230.200.040.670.145.0
G027.000−00.29827.000−0.29827.001−0.2972411167380.690.071.890.2015.1
G027.011−00.04027.011−0.04027.012−0.0391111151300.470.061.150.1410.4
G027.019−00.16627.019−0.16627.021−0.167136192210.200.040.510.115.1
G027.037−00.17127.037−0.17127.035−0.1652212269310.220.040.980.195.6
G027.066+00.01327.066+0.01327.078+0.0153216163440.250.051.760.355.4
G027.086−00.56427.086−0.56427.086−0.56398149220.390.050.920.138.7
G027.100−00.55927.100−0.55927.098−0.557178186300.570.061.480.1712.9
G027.173−00.00827.173−0.00827.173−0.0051410210270.270.050.830.146.5
G027.178−00.10527.178−0.10527.176−0.105129166270.430.061.290.179.4
G027.186−00.08227.186−0.08227.186−0.0792916268553.070.256.190.5067.8
G027.187−00.14827.187−0.14827.187−0.1482011213330.230.051.150.235.6
G027.207−00.10027.207−0.10027.208−0.0981615214350.440.062.090.289.6
G027.221+00.13627.221+0.13627.221+0.136168188300.840.091.700.1814.3
G027.248+00.10827.248+0.10827.245+0.1081614189340.530.071.640.2110.4
G027.256+00.13527.256+0.13527.255+0.136107130220.680.081.340.1511.9
G027.279+00.14527.279+0.14527.272+0.1473012193461.660.156.060.5328.5

Note:. Only a small portion of the data is provided here, the full table is available in the online version of this article via Supplementary Data or in electronic form at the CDS via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/.

Table 1.

The JPS ℓ = 30° preliminary compact source catalogue. The columns are as follows: (1) name derived from Galactic coordinates of the maximum intensity in the source; (2) and (3) Galactic coordinates of maximum intensity in the catalogue source; (4) and (5) Galactic coordinates of emission centroid; (6)–(8) semimajor and semiminor size and source position angle measured anticlockwise from Galactic north; (9) effective radius of source, i.e. |$R_{\rm eff}=\sqrt{\left(A/\pi \right)}$|⁠, where A is the area of the source above the threshold; (10)–(13) peak and integrated flux densities and their associated uncertainties; (14) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

NamemaxbmaxbσmajσminPAReffSpeakΔSpeakSintΔSintSNR
(°)(°)(°)(°)(″)(″)(°)(″)(Jy beam−1)(Jy)
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
G026.830−00.20826.830−0.20826.830−0.20676259160.380.080.640.135.6
G026.865−00.27626.865−0.27626.867−0.2761211112260.360.061.000.176.8
G026.957−00.07726.957−0.07726.956−0.076108224260.770.081.640.1715.2
G026.960−00.30926.960−0.30926.962−0.308147177230.200.040.670.145.0
G027.000−00.29827.000−0.29827.001−0.2972411167380.690.071.890.2015.1
G027.011−00.04027.011−0.04027.012−0.0391111151300.470.061.150.1410.4
G027.019−00.16627.019−0.16627.021−0.167136192210.200.040.510.115.1
G027.037−00.17127.037−0.17127.035−0.1652212269310.220.040.980.195.6
G027.066+00.01327.066+0.01327.078+0.0153216163440.250.051.760.355.4
G027.086−00.56427.086−0.56427.086−0.56398149220.390.050.920.138.7
G027.100−00.55927.100−0.55927.098−0.557178186300.570.061.480.1712.9
G027.173−00.00827.173−0.00827.173−0.0051410210270.270.050.830.146.5
G027.178−00.10527.178−0.10527.176−0.105129166270.430.061.290.179.4
G027.186−00.08227.186−0.08227.186−0.0792916268553.070.256.190.5067.8
G027.187−00.14827.187−0.14827.187−0.1482011213330.230.051.150.235.6
G027.207−00.10027.207−0.10027.208−0.0981615214350.440.062.090.289.6
G027.221+00.13627.221+0.13627.221+0.136168188300.840.091.700.1814.3
G027.248+00.10827.248+0.10827.245+0.1081614189340.530.071.640.2110.4
G027.256+00.13527.256+0.13527.255+0.136107130220.680.081.340.1511.9
G027.279+00.14527.279+0.14527.272+0.1473012193461.660.156.060.5328.5
NamemaxbmaxbσmajσminPAReffSpeakΔSpeakSintΔSintSNR
(°)(°)(°)(°)(″)(″)(°)(″)(Jy beam−1)(Jy)
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)
G026.830−00.20826.830−0.20826.830−0.20676259160.380.080.640.135.6
G026.865−00.27626.865−0.27626.867−0.2761211112260.360.061.000.176.8
G026.957−00.07726.957−0.07726.956−0.076108224260.770.081.640.1715.2
G026.960−00.30926.960−0.30926.962−0.308147177230.200.040.670.145.0
G027.000−00.29827.000−0.29827.001−0.2972411167380.690.071.890.2015.1
G027.011−00.04027.011−0.04027.012−0.0391111151300.470.061.150.1410.4
G027.019−00.16627.019−0.16627.021−0.167136192210.200.040.510.115.1
G027.037−00.17127.037−0.17127.035−0.1652212269310.220.040.980.195.6
G027.066+00.01327.066+0.01327.078+0.0153216163440.250.051.760.355.4
G027.086−00.56427.086−0.56427.086−0.56398149220.390.050.920.138.7
G027.100−00.55927.100−0.55927.098−0.557178186300.570.061.480.1712.9
G027.173−00.00827.173−0.00827.173−0.0051410210270.270.050.830.146.5
G027.178−00.10527.178−0.10527.176−0.105129166270.430.061.290.179.4
G027.186−00.08227.186−0.08227.186−0.0792916268553.070.256.190.5067.8
G027.187−00.14827.187−0.14827.187−0.1482011213330.230.051.150.235.6
G027.207−00.10027.207−0.10027.208−0.0981615214350.440.062.090.289.6
G027.221+00.13627.221+0.13627.221+0.136168188300.840.091.700.1814.3
G027.248+00.10827.248+0.10827.245+0.1081614189340.530.071.640.2110.4
G027.256+00.13527.256+0.13527.255+0.136107130220.680.081.340.1511.9
G027.279+00.14527.279+0.14527.272+0.1473012193461.660.156.060.5328.5

Note:. Only a small portion of the data is provided here, the full table is available in the online version of this article via Supplementary Data or in electronic form at the CDS via http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/.

Table 2.

FellWalker parameter settings used in the source extraction.

fellwalker.allowedge0
fellwalker.cleaniter5
fellwalker.flatslope1
fellwalker.fwhmbeam1
fellwalker.maxbad0.05
fellwalker.maxjump3
fellwalker.mindip1.5
fellwalker.minheight3
fellwalker.minpix7
fellwalker.noise1
fellwalker.rms1
fellwalker.shapeellipse
fellwalker.allowedge0
fellwalker.cleaniter5
fellwalker.flatslope1
fellwalker.fwhmbeam1
fellwalker.maxbad0.05
fellwalker.maxjump3
fellwalker.mindip1.5
fellwalker.minheight3
fellwalker.minpix7
fellwalker.noise1
fellwalker.rms1
fellwalker.shapeellipse
Table 2.

FellWalker parameter settings used in the source extraction.

fellwalker.allowedge0
fellwalker.cleaniter5
fellwalker.flatslope1
fellwalker.fwhmbeam1
fellwalker.maxbad0.05
fellwalker.maxjump3
fellwalker.mindip1.5
fellwalker.minheight3
fellwalker.minpix7
fellwalker.noise1
fellwalker.rms1
fellwalker.shapeellipse
fellwalker.allowedge0
fellwalker.cleaniter5
fellwalker.flatslope1
fellwalker.fwhmbeam1
fellwalker.maxbad0.05
fellwalker.maxjump3
fellwalker.mindip1.5
fellwalker.minheight3
fellwalker.minpix7
fellwalker.noise1
fellwalker.rms1
fellwalker.shapeellipse

4.3 Flux calibration and photometric corrections

FellWalker produces peak flux density values taken simply from the highest pixel value associated with each extracted source. Integrated flux densities are calculated by summing the values of all associated pixels in the source mask and dividing the result by the so-called beam integral, which is the number of pixels per beam. The latter is determined from the ratio of integrated to peak surface brightness of a point source. In this case, the observations of Neptune, reduced in the same manner as the science data were used, producing a beam integral value of 17.5, which is significantly larger than that expected for a Gaussian beam (∼14), although the FWHM of the Neptune image is consistent with the latter. This is due to significant power in the wings of the JCMT beam, as discussed by Dempsey et al. (2013b).

In addition to this, the FW method, in common with similar algorithms, effectively uses variable aperture photometry to produce integrated flux densities, with the aperture size set by the number of associated pixels above the inclusion threshold in the source masks. This number is SNR dependent and so requires the application of an aperture correction. This has been done by converting the area in pixels (A) of each source to an effective source circular radius |$r = \theta \sqrt{A/\pi }$|⁠, where θ is the angular pixel scale, and then using the aperture correction values tabulated by Dempsey et al. (2013b). The latter were checked using our own observation of Neptune, and found to be consistent to within 1 per cent. Values intermediate to those tabulated were interpolated using a polynomial fit (see Fig. 9). Note that these corrections are only approximate, since they take no account of departures from circular symmetry. However, they only significantly affect small sources, those with sizes only a little larger than the beam, and these are likely to be circular. Most irregular sources are extended with respect to the beam and for sources with diameters >60 arcsec the correction is of the order of 10 per cent or less. It is also the case that very compact and unresolved sources are relatively rare. The error beam contribution is estimated to have an amplitude of 2 per cent (Dempsey et al. 2013b), which is much less than the other uncertainties.

Figure 9.

Aperture corrections determined by Dempsey et al. (2013b, filled circles) and re-normalized to a value of 100 per cent at the largest aperture, then fitted with a fifth-order polynomial fit (dashed line), from which corrections were applied to the integrated fluxes produced by FellWalker.

As a check on the photometry of the sources extracted by FellWalker, we have compared the peak flux densities of the JPS compact sources to those of spatially corresponding detections in the ATLASGAL survey (Contreras et al. 2013). We searched the ATLASGAL compact-source catalogue (Urquhart et al. 2014b) for the closest spatial coincidence within 10 arcsec of each JPS detection and found 484 matching sources. Fig. 10 (upper panel) shows the comparison of peak flux densities for this initial matched list. It can be seen that the JPS peak flux densities are systematically lower than those of ATLASGAL, with a scatter that increases towards lower values. Much of this systematic difference can be attributed to the fact that most sources in the ATLASGAL catalogue were found to be at least somewhat extended. Given the larger APEX beam (19 arcsec, compared to around 14.5 arcsec for JCMT) at these wavelengths, we expect peak flux densities to be larger in the former data. To correct for this, we repeated the JPS source extraction after convolving the data to the ATLASGAL spatial resolution and scaling the signal level so as to restore the (equality of) peak and integrated flux densities of point sources. The lower panel of Fig. 10 shows the result, this time with 500 positional matches and a significant improvement in the flux matching. The mean ratio of peak flux densities in the two catalogues for these latter matched sources is S850(JPS)/S870(ATLAS) = 0.93 ± 0.01 and a standard deviation of 0.12. Despite being observed with different telescopes and detectors and using unrelated techniques, reduced using different procedures and the source extraction being done using independent methods (ATLASGAL uses SExtractor), the fluxes in the two catalogues are in very good agreement. This is, therefore, an important consistency check on the reliability of the results of both catalogues.

Figure 10.

Comparison of the peak flux densities of extracted JPS sources to the corresponding ATLASGAL compact sources – top: unsmoothed data with 484 matches; bottom: with JPS data convolved to the resolution of ATLASGAL, producing 500 matches.

The scatter in the correlation widens at lower flux densities as might be expected where the SNR in the ATLASGAL data becomes low. However, there is also a deviation from the correlation at the low end, in the form of a tail with high values of S850(JPS)/S870(ATLAS). This tail may be the result of a bias related to the flux-boosting bias found in the JPS data (see Section 4.5). Without it, the correspondence between the two flux scales becomes almost perfect. Taking only JPS fluxes above 0.5 Jy beam−1, the mean peak-flux-density ratio in the matched sample is 1.001 ± 0.001 and the median value is 1.012.

4.4 Completeness tests

To test the efficiency of the source-extraction algorithm as a function of source flux we injected artificial compact sources on to a field of uniform noise, the latter distributed as a Gaussian with a standard deviation of ∼20 mJy beam−1, similar to that in the data. The source profiles were Gaussian and circularly symmetrical with FWHM = 5 pixels (20 arcsec). FellWalker was then used with the same settings as in the survey data to recover the artificial sources. The rate of detections as a function of input flux density then allows us to benchmark the performance of the extraction algorithm in this idealized case.

The cupid task MAKECLUMPS was used to generate a catalogue of artificial objects with a uniform distribution in ℓ, b. The peak fluxes of the injected objects were uniformly distributed between 0.02 and 0.5 Jy beam−1 and the source profiles were Gaussian with FWHM of 5 pixels (20 arcsec). We used the size of the survey field as a template and injected a similar number of sources as was detected by FellWalker in the data. Fig. 11 shows the number of sources recovered as a function of input peak flux and that the source extraction algorithm is approximately 95 per cent complete above 80 mJy beam−1 (∼4σ).

Figure 11.

The ratio of recovered to injected source counts as a function of input peak flux density. The dashed vertical lines indicate (from left to right) the 1σ, 3σ, 5σ and 7σ noise levels.

Fig. 12 compares the values of the original and recovered peak flux densities of the injected sources. These are very well correlated, showing that, in general, source fluxes are recovered accurately. However, the recovered fluxes for the weaker sources are systematically higher than their injected values. The reason for this is that FellWalker sets the peak flux to be the value of the brightest pixel in the source and, since the injected sources are all slightly extended, there is often a pixel with a positive noise deviation near the peak that adds constructively to the measured peak flux, creating a small bias. This results in the average measured flux density being approximately 1σ larger than expected for the weaker sources. This systematic bias to higher flux values for weaker sources is well fitted by a second-order polynomial function (Fig. 12) and the recovered real source flux densities can be corrected accordingly.

Figure 12.

A comparison of recovered peak flux densities to the input values for the artificial sources used in the completeness tests. The solid blue line represents equality and the dashed red curve shows the result of a polynomial fit to the data.

The polynomial coefficients are: Sν(corr) = −0.0374 + 1.187 Sν(orig) − 0.265 Sν(orig)2, where Sν(corr) and Sν(orig) are the corrected and original peak flux values (in Jy beam−1), respectively. We apply this correction to all sources with peak flux densities below 0.3 Jy beam−1. Above this value the correction is not necessary as it is only a few per cent of the flux value, significantly less than the ≤5 per cent flux calibration uncertainty in 850-μm SCUBA-2 data.

4.5 Flux distributions (peak and integrated)

Fig. 13 shows the distribution of peak flux densities in the sample of compact sources extracted from the ℓ = 30 field, as described above and listed in Table 1. Similarly, Fig. 14 shows the distribution of integrated flux densities. Both of these are compared, without corrections for differing beam size, to the equivalent distributions in the sources extracted from the ATLASGAL compact-source catalogue (Contreras et al. 2013; Urquhart et al. 2014b; note that a later ATLASGAL catalogue is available; Csengeri et al. 2014) in the same area of sky. Both figures include a power-law fit to the JPS data above the turnovers in each case.

Figure 13.

Distribution of peak flux densities of all extracted compact sources in the ℓ = 30 field (grey shaded histogram) with the equivalent ATLASGAL distribution in the same projected area of sky (blue outline histogram). The red line indicates the linear least-squares fit to the data above the completeness turnover.

Figure 14.

Distribution of integrated flux densities of the extracted compact sources in the ℓ = 30 field (grey shaded histogram) with the equivalent ATLASGAL distribution in the same projected area of sky (blue outline histogram)

The distributions in Fig. 13 are very similar, with much the same slope that approximates well to a power law in both data sets. The main difference is that the ATLASGAL distribution turns over at a peak flux density about five times higher than that of the JPS sample and has a slight excess of brighter sources. In contrast, the integrated flux-density distributions in Fig. 14 are significantly different. The ATLASGAL sample distribution is shifted to values that are around a factor of 2 higher than for JPS and appears to be less well represented by a power law. The latter difference is likely to be the result of source merging in the larger APEX telescope beam (∼19 arcsec FWHM).

The turnover in the peak flux-density distribution, which can normally be assumed to mark the effects of incompleteness in the sample, is significantly higher than the limit calculated from the tests on artificial data described above. This is likely to be because of confusion due to source crowding and perhaps non-uniform noise, effects that are likely to be position dependent within the survey. If this is the case, the true completeness limit in the ℓ = 30° field may be as high as 0.1–0.2 Jy beam−1 (which may be compared to the corresponding limit in the ATLASGAL survey at 0.3–0.5 Jy beam−1, Contreras et al. 2013). Estimating again from the turnovers in the distributions, the JPS integrated source flux densities appear complete above ∼0.8 Jy while ATLASGAL limit is around 2–3 Jy. More rigorous tests will be conducted to quantify completeness when the entire JPS data set is available.

4.6 The mass distribution of clumps in W43

The W43 Giant Molecular Complex is the most distinctive feature in the JPS l = 30|$\deg$| observations and dominates the emission within the region. This massive-star-forming complex is thought to be at the end of the Galactic Long Bar and molecular clouds associated with it cover longitudes of l = 29–32 and latitudes of ∣ b |$\mid \le 1\deg$| (Nguyen-Luong et al. 2011) and are found at velocities of 80–110 km s−1.

By extracting spectra at the positions of the catalogued JPS sources from 13CO J = 3 → 2 data cubes in the CO Heterodyne Inner Milky Way Plane Survey (Rigby et al., in preparation), which are briefly described in Eden et al. (2012), or in 13CO J = 1 → 0 from the GRS, we can identify JPS sources that are in the l, b, v range associated with the W43 complex. Because of the latitude range of the 13CO J = 3 → 2 survey, GRS data were used for sources with ∣ b ∣ > 0| $_{.}^{\circ}$|5.

676 JPS sources were found in the appropriate l and b range for W43, 47 of which required the extraction of GRS spectra to identify their velocities. 450 of these have velocities within the W43 limits and so are considered to be associated with the complex.

The masses of the sources were calculated using the standard optically thin conversion,
\begin{equation} M = \frac{S_{\nu }D^{2}}{\kappa _{\nu }B_{\nu }(T_{d})}. \end{equation}
(1)
Taking the mass absorption coefficient at λ = 850 μm to be κ850 = 0.001 m2 kg−1 (Mitchell et al. 2001), and assuming a distance of 5.49 kpc (Zhang et al. 2014) and a single dust temperature of 18 K for all sources, the conversion becomes M/M = 225 × S850/Jy.

We use the derived masses to plot the clump-mass function (CMF) of the W43 complex and this is presented in Fig. 15. Assuming the CMF to be a power law above the observed turnover (log10(M/M) = 2.4) of the form ΔNM ∝ Mα, a least-squares fit to the CMF gives an index of α = −1.87 ± 0.05. This is consistent with the results of Urquhart et al. (2014c), who found values in the range −1.85 to −1.91 for ATLASGAL clumps that house tracers of massive-star formation, across different evolutionary stages and distributed over a large section of the GP.

Figure 15.

The mass function of JPS compact sources associated with clouds in the W43 complex. The red line indicates the least-squares linear fit to the data and the error bars indicate the Poisson statistics.

The slope of the distribution is also consistent with those found for Galactic giant molecular clouds (GMCs), although the mass range is very different. The spectrum of GMC masses greater than (log10(M/M) = 4) can also be fitted by a power law, with studies by Solomon et al. (1987), Heyer, Carpenter & Snell (2001) and Roman-Duval et al. (2010), giving −1.50 ± 0.36, −1.80 ± 0.03 and −2.02 ± 0.11, respectively (the Roman-Duval et al. value has been re-calculated for ΔNM, rather than ΔN/Δlog M, as published).

The fact that the mass functions of the clump and cloud populations are indistinguishable, both across the GP and in a specific region as in this study, suggests that the same process, whether physical or stochastic, is determining both distributions. Measurements of the fraction of molecular gas within clouds that has been converted into dense clumps (the CFE), using the BGPS (Eden et al. 2012, 2013; Battisti & Heyer 2014) found a fairly constant value between 5 and 15 per cent when averaged over samples of clouds. This, together with a consistent power-law index for the mass functions of clouds and clumps, suggests that, outside of the Galactic Centre regions, the CFE is not sensitive to the local environment on kiloparsec scales (large variations in CFE from cloud to cloud are found on smaller scales, however; see Eden et al. 2012).

4.7 Star formation in the W43 sample

4.7.1 Virial state

To calculate the virial masses of the W43 sources, the measured 13CO line width was corrected to estimate the average velocity dispersion of the total column of gas. Using the prescription of Fuller & Myers (1992), the average line-of-sight velocity dispersion is
\begin{equation} \Delta v^{2}_{\rm avg} = \Delta v^{2}_{\rm corr} + 8 \ln 2 \times \frac{kT_{\rm kin}}{m_{\rm H}}\left(\frac{1}{\mu _{\rm gas}} - \frac{1}{\mu _{\rm CO}}\right), \end{equation}
(2)
where |$\Delta v^{2}_{\rm corr}$| is the observed CO line width corrected for the spectrometer resolution, k is the Boltzmann constant, Tkin is the gas kinetic temperature, taken to be 12 K from the average excitation temperatures found for W43 clouds from 13CO J = 2–1 data by Carlhoff et al. (2013). The values in the latter work are derived from a single transition and are therefore lower limits. The choice is not critical, however, as in any case the thermal line-width correction to the velocity dispersion in equation (2) is small (no more than 10 per cent). The mean masses of molecular gas and of carbon monoxide are μgas = 2.33 and μCO = 28, respectively. The virial mass for each clump can then be calculated from
\begin{equation} {\left(\frac{M_{\rm vir}}{\mathrm{M}_{{\odot }}}\right) = 161 \left(\frac{R}{\rm pc}\right)\left(\frac{\Delta v_{\rm avg}}{\rm km\,s^{-1}}\right)^{2}, } \end{equation}
(3)
(Urquhart et al. 2014c), where R is the half-power radius of the clump, evaluated from the geometric mean of σmaj and σmin from Table 1.

The distribution of the virial ratios (α = Mvir/Mclump of the W43 clumps is shown in Fig. 16. The distribution peaks just below α = 2 with a logarithmic mean of −0.080 and median of −0.236.

Figure 16.

Distribution of calculated virial ratios for the dense clumps identified with the W43 complex.

It is a commonly observed result that virial ratios tend to cluster around a value within a factor of 2 of unity. Allowing for scatter due to random error, this is usually taken to indicate that the majority of the clumps can be considered to be gravitationally bound and are likely to be either pre-stellar or protostellar. It should be noted, however, that such results are probably subject to selection effects, especially that arising from the lack of stable equilibria between internal pressure and gravity, and the consequent short-lived nature of heavily gravitationally sub- or supercritical clump material that is observable in the 850-μm continuum,

Kauffmann, Pillai & Goldsmith (2013, originally Bertoldi & McKee 1992) define the critical value for the virial ratio as α = 2 for sources which are not supported by a magnetic field and, as a result, sources with α < 2 are gravitationally unstable and require the presence of a strong magnetic field to provide support. This is the case for 93 per cent of the W43 sources.

A strong relationship of decreasing α with increasing clump mass is found, similar to that seen in the results of Kauffmann et al. (2013) and by Urquhart et al. (2014b) for ATLASGAL clumps associated with tracers of massive star formation, and is shown in Fig. 17. A fit to the data finds a slope of −0.42 ± 0.06, consistent with Urquhart et al. (2014c), who find −0.53 ± 0.16. This may again be the result of selection effects, particularly those associated with the mixing of gas and dust tracers in the analysis. Taken at face value, however, this relationship suggests that the clumps in the sample are not quite Larson-like. Such objects would have Δv ∝ M0.2 and M ∝ R2, which would give α ∼ const. The observed relation requires either a steeper dependence of M on R or Δv to be virtually constant, or both.

Figure 17.

Dependence of virial ratio on clump mass in the dense clumps identified with the W43 complex; The linear fit shown by the dashed line is −0.42 ± 0.08

4.7.2 Evolutionary state

W43 is a site of recent and ongoing star formation. The scale of the current star formation activity can be determined by JPS clumps that are coincident with 70-μm Hi-GAL compact sources, the presence of which is taken to be a reliable indicator of star formation (e.g. Faimali et al. 2012).

A total of 287 70-μm sources were found to be coincident with 233 clumps from the W43 complex sample, with the majority of JPS clumps found to be coincident with a single Hi-GAL source (185 clumps). The largest number of Hi-GAL sources found to be associated with a single JPS clump was 3, which happened on five occasions.

The sample of massive clumps in W43 is complete above ∼100 M and 440 of the whole sample of 450 have masses above this value. If we assume that the SFR is constant, the relative statistical lifetimes of the pre-stellar and star-forming clumps above this threshold is given by the relative numbers in the two subsets. By taking the lifetime of the clumps to be 0.5 Myr (e.g. Ginsburg et al. 2012), we find that the relative lifetimes of the two phases are 0.26 × 106 and 0.24 × 106 yr for the star-forming and non-star-forming clumps, respectively. It is no surprise that the lifetimes of the two phases are very similar as the starless lifetime of an eventual star-forming clump has been estimated at less than half a Myr (e.g. Ginsburg et al. 2012) and the time-scale of the IR-bright stage of MYSOs ranges from 7 × 104 to 4 × 105 yr, for sources with luminosities between 104 and 105 L (Mottram et al. 2011), respectively.

In a sample-based study, the luminosity of the YSOs detected at 70 μm can be usefully estimated from the mean ratio of the 70-μm flux to integrated infrared YSO luminosity obtained from the sample of Eden et al. (2015). This ratio was measured to be log 10(Fbol/F70 μm) = 1.96 with a standard deviation of 0.56. The resulting luminosities can then be used to calculate the ratio L/M for the individual clumps. The resulting distribution of L/M values is shown in Fig. 18.

Figure 18.

The distribution of the ratio between clump (IR) luminosity to clump mass for the subset of sources in the W43 JPS sample that have associated 70-μm detections in the Hi-GAL data.

The range of values matches those found by Eden et al. (2015), varying between 0 and 80 L/M, with a mean value of 6.50 ± 0.66 L/M and a median value of 2.56 ± 2.06 L/M. The distribution of L/M is consistent with being lognormal with both Anderson–Darling and Shapiro–Wilk tests giving probabilities of 0.107 and 0.151, respectively. The distribution can therefore be fitted with a Gaussian which has a mean of log10(L/M) = 0.48 (i.e. L/M = 3.0) and a standard deviation of 1.14, giving a standard error on the mean of 0.075 or about 20 per cent. These representative values are close to those found in an analysis of Hi-GAL data on infrared dark clouds in the longitude range |$15\deg \le \ell \le 55\deg$| by Traficante et al. (2015), who found mean L/M values of ∼3.6 and ∼5.7 for starless and protostellar sources, respectively. The presence of a lognormal distribution tells us that the processes behind the distribution of L/M values, both in this region and across the GP, are the result of the multiplicative effect of multiple random processes within star-forming regions, be these the larger molecular-cloud environments (indicated by the lognormal distribution of clump-mass to cloud-mass ratios: Eden et al. 2012, 2013), or individual star-forming clumps.

Fig. 19 shows the relationship between L and M for the subset of clumps associated with the W43 cloud. The gradient of the bisection-method linear regression fit to the distribution of points in log space is 1.76 ± 0.16. This is significantly steeper than the value of 1.09 ± 0.13 found by Urquhart et al. (2014c), for a distance-limited set of ATLASGAL clumps associated with tracers of massive star formation (methanol masers, H ii regions and RMS MYSOs). The difference may be accounted for by the inclusion of a population of sources with low L/M values at masses below ∼103 M, that may be relatively unevolved.

Figure 19.

The relationship between embedded IR luminosity and clump mass for the subset of sources in the W43 JPS sample that have associated 70-μm detections in the Hi-GAL data. The red dot–dashed line indicates the linear fit to the JPS data. Also shown are the relationships found by Urquhart et al. (2014b) for ATLASGAL sources associated with: any tracer of massive star formation (green dashed line) and a distance-limited subsample (yellow dot–dashed); methanol masers only (blue dotted line). The gradients of those lines are 1.03, 1.09 and 0.857, respectively.

The mean value of L/M in W43 is significantly lower than that of 16.0 ± 0.7 found for all ATLASGAL clumps associated with massive star formation but is closer to the 6.8 ± 0.7 found for methanol-maser-associated clumps alone by Urquhart et al. (2014b). L/M is only weakly dependent on M, if at all, so the inclusion of higher mass clumps in the ATLASGAL sample should not account for this. The distribution in Fig. 19 suggests rather that the W43 sample includes an excess population of sources in the mass range 100 to 1000 M with low L/M values. These sources may be relatively young. Nguyen-Luong et al. (2011) found that the ‘future’ (i.e. incipient) SFR in W43, as traced by the submm continuum, is around five times larger than the current SFR estimated from the 8-μm luminosity, and the larger value is consistent with the similar prediction by Motte et al. (2003, and see also Nguyen-Luong et al. 2013).

5 SUMMARY

Early results from the JCMT Plane Survey, part of the JCMT Legacy Survey programme are presented from the survey region centred on Galactic longitude |$\ell = 30\deg$|⁠. The results incorporate data at about the 40 per cent completion stage (in both this region and the whole survey), the point at which the sensitivity appears close to the confusion limit in this crowded area of the GP.

The contamination of the 850-μm continuum band by emission in the 12CO J = 3–2 line was investigated using COHRS data. The majority of the significant continuum emission has contamination levels in the region of a few per cent, less than the flux calibration uncertainty, and insufficient to warrant the development of a detailed correction method at this time.

Compact-source identification and extraction are done using the FellWalker algorithm resulting in a sample of 1029 objects above a 5σ flux threshold. The measured peak flux densities in this sample are compared to those in positionally matched detections from the ATLASGAL 870-μm compact-source catalogue and found to be consistent after correction for the different beam sizes.

Initial completeness tests were made using FW to retrieve artificial sources from a uniform Gaussian noise field with rms deviation equivalent to that in the data. The source flux densities were recovered accurately above peak values of 0.3 mJy beam−1. Below this, fluxes tended to be overestimated, perhaps due to noise-related biasing in the detection method. Source flux densities below 0.3 mJy beam−1 have been corrected for this effect. The completeness limit estimated in this way is of 95 per cent completeness above 80 mJy beam−1, which is around 4σ in these data. The true completeness limit in the |$\ell = 30\deg$| region is larger than this, however, probably due to confusion. We estimate this level to be about 0.2 Jy beam−1. The corresponding limit in the integrated flux densities is ∼0.8 Jy which may be compared to a limit of 4–8 Jy in the ATLASGAL survey.

The population of dense clumps associated with the W43 massive-star-forming complex clump masses is analysed. The virial state of these clumps is clustered around the equilibrium value. The relative statistical lifetime of the protostellar and starless clumps (with and without a 70-μm detection) are about equal and the distribution of the ratio L/Mclump suggests that these sources are younger than the Milky Way average.

The JCMT has historically been operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, the National Research Council of Canada and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. The data presented in this paper were taken under JCMT observing programme MJLSJ02.

REFERENCES

Aguirre
J. E.
et al. 
2011
ApJS
192
4

Battisti
A. J.
Heyer
M. H.
2014
ApJ
780
173

Benjamin
R. A.
et al. 
2003
PASP
115
953

Berry
D. S.
2015
Astron. Comput.
10
22

Berry
D. S.
Reinhold
K.
Jenness
T.
Economou
F.
2007
Shaw
R. A.
Hill
F.
Bell
D. J.
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI
Astron. Soc. Pac.
San Francisco
425

Bertoldi
F.
McKee
C. F.
1992
ApJ
395
140

Bintley
D.
et al. 
2014
Proc. SPIE
9153
3

Bonnell
I. A.
Bate
M. R.
2006
MNRAS
370
488

Carey
S.
et al. 
2009
PASP
121
76

Carlhoff
S.
et al. 
2013
A&A
560
24

Chapin
E. L.
Berry
D. S.
Gibb
A. G.
Jenness
T.
Scott
D.
Tilanus
R. P. J.
Economou
F.
Holland
W. S.
2013
MNRAS
430
2545

Chrysostomou
A.
2010
Corbett
I. F.
Proc. IAU 5: Highlights of Astronomy 15, The JCMT Legacy Survey: Mapping the Milky Way in the Submillimetre
Cambridge Univ. Press
Cambridge
797

Churchwell
E.
et al. 
2009
PASP
121
213

Contreras
Y.
et al. 
2013
A&A
549
45

Csengeri
T.
et al. 
2014
A&A
565
75

Davies
B.
Hoare
M. G.
Lumsden
S. L.
Hosokawa
T.
Oudmaijer
R. D.
Urquhart
J. S.
Mottram
J. C.
Stead
J.
2011
MNRAS
416
972

Dempsey
J. T.
Thomas
H. S.
Currie
M. J.
2013a
ApJS
209
8

Dempsey
J. T.
et al. 
2013b
MNRAS
430
2534

Drabek
E.
et al. 
2012
MNRAS
426
23

Eden
D. J.
Moore
T. J. T.
Plume
R.
Morgan
L. K.
2012
MNRAS
422
3178

Eden
D. J.
Moore
T. J. T.
Morgan
L. K.
Thompson
M. A.
Urquhart
J. S.
2013
MNRAS
431
1587

Eden
D. J.
Moore
T. J. T.
Urquhart
J. S.
Elia
D.
Plume
R.
Rigby
A. J.
Thompson
M. A.
2015
MNRAS
452
289

Faimali
A.
et al. 
2012
MNRAS
426
402

Fuller
G. A.
Myers
P. C.
1992
ApJ
384
523

Ginsburg
A.
Bressert
E.
Bally
J.
Battersby
C.
2012
ApJ
758
29

Hatchell
J.
et al. 
2013
MNRAS
429
10

Heyer
M. H.
Carpenter
J. M
Snell
R. L.
2001
ApJ
551
852

Hoare
M. G.
et al. 
2012
PASP
124
939

Holland
W.
et al. 
2013
MNRAS
430
2513

Jackson
J. M.
et al. 
2006
ApJS
163
145

Jenness
T.
Berry
D.
Chapin
E.
Economou
F.
Gibb
A.
Scott
D.
2011
Evans
I. N.
Accomazzi
A.
Mink
D. J.
Rots
A. H.
ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 422, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XX
Astron. Soc. Pac.
San Francisco
281

Johnstone
D.
Boonman
A. M. S.
van Dishoeck
E. F.
2003
A&A
412
157

Kauffmann
J.
Pillai
T.
Goldsmith
P. F.
2013
ApJ
779
185

Lumsden
S. L.
Hoare
M. G.
Urquhart
J. S.
Oudmaijer
R. D.
Davies
B.
Mottram
J. C.
Cooper
H. D. B.
Moore
T. J. T.
2013
ApJS
208
11

Men'shchikov
A.
André
Ph.
Didelon
P.
Motte
F.
Hennemann
M.
Schneider
N.
2012
A&A
542
81

Mitchell
G. F.
Johnstone
D.
Moriarty-Schieven
G.
Fich
M.
Tothill
N. F. H.
2001
556
215

Molinari
S.
et al. 
2010a
PASP
122
314

Molinari
S.
et al. 
2010b
A&A
518
100

Moore
T. J. T.
Urquhart
J. S.
Thompson
M. A.
Morgan
L. K.
2012
MNRAS
426
701

Motte
F.
Schilke
P.
Lis
D. C.
2003
ApJ
582
277

Mottram
J.
et al. 
2011
ApJ
730
33

Nguyen-Luong
Q.
et al. 
2011
A&A
529
41

Nguyen-Luong
Q.
et al. 
2013
ApJ
775
88

Planck Collaboration XI
2014
A&A
571
11

Purcell
C. R.
et al. 
2013
ApJS
205
1

Roman-Duval
J.
Jackson
J. M.
Heyer
M.
Rathborne
J.
Simon
R.
2010
ApJ
723
492

Sadavoy
S. I.
et al. 
2013
ApJ
767
126

Schuller
F.
et al. 
2009
A&A
504
415

Siringo
G.
et al. 
2009
A&A
497
945

Solomon
P. M.
Rivolo
A. R.
Barrett
J.
Yahil
A.
1987
ApJ
319
730

Traficante
A.
Fuller
G. A.
Peretto
N.
Pineda
J. E.
Molinari
S.
2015
MNRAS
451
3089

Urquhart
J. S.
Figura
C. C.
Moore
T. J. T.
Hoare
M. G.
Lumsden
S. L.
Mottram
J. C.
Thompson
M. A.
Oudmaijer
R. D.
2014a
MNRAS
437
1791

Urquhart
J. S.
et al. 
2014b
MNRAS
443
1555

Urquhart
J. S.
et al. 
2014c
A&A
568
41

Watson
M. E.
2010
MSc thesis
Univ. Hertfordshire

Wyrowski
F.
Menten
K. M.
Schilke
P.
Thorwirth
S.
Güsten
R.
Bergman
P.
2006
A&A
454
L91

Zhang
B.
et al. 
2014
ApJ
781
89

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article:

Table 1. The JPS ℓ = 30° preliminary compact source catalogue.

(Supplementary Data).

Please note: Oxford University Press are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Supplementary data