Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Lu, Ran; Banerjee, Subir K; Jackson, Mike (1993): (Table 1) Rock magnetic study of sediments from ODP Site 131-808 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.785278, Supplement to: Lu, R et al. (1993): Rock magnetic study of sediments from Site 808, Leg 131. In: Hill, IA; Taira, A; Firth, JV; et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), 131, 293-300, https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.131.128.1993

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Shipboard magnetic investigation showed two zones of weak natural remanent magnetization (NRM): 675-925 and 1080-1243 meters below sea floor. Within these two sections, NRM intensity decreases by one to two orders of magnitude. Additional magnetic measurements onshore have shown similar fluctuations for NRM and saturation magnetization (Js). Js becomes almost zero in the low-NRM intensity zones, indicating a small magnetic content. The variation of relative magnetic grain sizes have been examined by the ratio of ARM/K0 (anhysteretic remanent magnetization to low magnetic field susceptibility) and by partial ARM (pARM) measurements. Both results indicate difference in magnetic grain sizes between the high- and low-intensity zones.
For these Site 808 sediments, we have not found any correlation between magnetic intensity variation and sediment units. In addition, the calcite content varies only by a factor of 1.5 at the most, rather than 1 to 2 orders of magnitude, and therefore calcite dilution can not account for the low intensities. Because the changes in sediment sources and compositions can not explain these unusual magnetic phenomena, we suggest that the low-intensity zones may be interpreted in terms of deep-seated diagenetic alteration. Our study points out that (1) it may be difficult to establish a magnetostratigraphy for deep sediments due to extremely low NRM intensity, and (2) sudden decreases in NRM intensity may not result from an unusually low paleomagnetic field intensity.
Project(s):
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 32.352067 * Median Longitude: 134.944100 * South-bound Latitude: 32.351400 * West-bound Longitude: 134.943600 * North-bound Latitude: 32.352800 * East-bound Longitude: 134.944400
Date/Time Start: 1990-04-04T22:30:00 * Date/Time End: 1990-05-02T14:40:00
Minimum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 0.50 m * Maximum DEPTH, sediment/rock: 1282.18 m
Event(s):
131-808A * Latitude: 32.352000 * Longitude: 134.944400 * Date/Time Start: 1990-04-04T22:30:00 * Date/Time End: 1990-04-06T15:45:00 * Elevation: -4687.0 m * Penetration: 111.4 m * Recovery: 88.68 m * Location: Philippine Sea * Campaign: Leg131 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 13 cores; 111.4 m cored; 0 m drilled; 79.6 % recovery
131-808B * Latitude: 32.351400 * Longitude: 134.943600 * Date/Time Start: 1990-04-06T15:45:00 * Date/Time End: 1990-04-16T04:00:00 * Elevation: -4685.0 m * Penetration: 358.8 m * Recovery: 59.71 m * Location: Philippine Sea * Campaign: Leg131 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 28 cores; 247.8 m cored; 0 m drilled; 24.1 % recovery
131-808C * Latitude: 32.352800 * Longitude: 134.944300 * Date/Time Start: 1990-04-16T04:00:00 * Date/Time End: 1990-05-02T14:40:00 * Elevation: -4686.0 m * Penetration: 1327 m * Recovery: 572.43 m * Location: Philippine Sea * Campaign: Leg131 * Basis: Joides Resolution * Method/Device: Drilling/drill rig (DRILL) * Comment: 108 cores; 1028.5 m cored; 0 m drilled; 55.7 % recovery
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEvent
2Sample code/labelSample labelLu, RanDSDP/ODP/IODP sample designation
3DEPTH, sediment/rockDepth sedmGeocode – mbsf
4NRM, InclinationIncl (NRM)degLu, Ran
5NRM, IntensityInten (NRM)mA/mLu, Ran
Size:
504 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML