Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Tilman's predicted productivity–diversity relationship shown by desert rodents

Abstract

Tilman1 has developed a model to predict the number of plant species that can coexist competitively on a limited resource base. Species diversity first increases over low resource supplies, then declines as the environment becomes richer. Although Tilman's model was developed to describe interspecific interactions between plant species, it may also apply to animal species. Tilman1 questions whether animals specialize on particular proportions of nutrients. However, we believe animals probably specialize on relatively subtle microhabitat differences, especially in a multispecies competitive regime2. Thus, microhabitats may act like nutrients. We hypothesize that animal species, too, show a peaked curve of diversity over productivity. The present data provide a confirmation of the hypothesis using rodent species. We have investigated the number of rodent species along a geographical gradient of increasing rainfall. The gradient extends from extremely poor desert habitats to those with annual rainfall over 300 mm. Because of the aridity, precipitation reflects productivity. The diversity pattern in desert rodents agrees with that predicted by Tilman for plants. It even possesses similar asymmetry, rising steeply then falling slowly. The pattern is duplicated in rocky and sandy habitats, each of which has a distinct and almost non-overlapping assemblage of species. As mean precipitation is closely correlated with the variability of precipitation, the diversity pattern might also be caused by a decline in the frequency of disturbances, models for which have been proposed by several investigators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenzweig, M. L. Ecology 62, 327–335 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walter, H. Jb. für wiss. Bot. 87, 750–860 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haim, A. & Tchernov, E. Mammalia 38, 201–223 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenzweig, M. L. Am. Nat. 102, 67–74 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J. H. Ecology 54, 775–787 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J. H. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J.) 315–341 (Belknap, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abramsky, Z., Brand, S. & Rosenzweig, M. L. (submitted).

  9. Rosenzweig, M. L. Science 171, 385–387 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenzweig, M. L. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. & Diamond, J.) 121–140 (Belknap, Cambridge, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacArthur, R. H. Geogr. Ecol. (Harper & Row, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McNaughton, S. J. Ecology 49, 962–972 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abramsky, Z. Oecologia 34, 113–123 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patrick, R. A. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 108, 359–365 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirchner, T. Ecology 58, 1334–1344 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silvertown, J. J. appl. Ecol. 17, 491–5904 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, J. H. & Gibson, A. C. Biogeography (Mosby, St. Louis, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tappan, H. & Loeblich, A. R. Earth-Sci. Rev. 9, 207–240 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J. & Niemela, P. Am. Nat. 118, 240–261 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pimm, S. L. & Rosenzweig, M. L. Oikos 37, 1–6 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bar, Y., Abramsky, Z. & Gutenmar, Y. J. Arid Envir. (in the press).

  22. Grime, J. J. envir. Mgmt 1, 151–167 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Connell, J. H. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huston, M. Am. Nat. 113, 81–101 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Levin, S. A. & Paine, R. T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 2744–2747 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grubb, P. Biol. Rev. 52, 107–145 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lubchenco, J. Am. Nat. 112, 23–39 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Conrad, V. Mon. Weath. Rev. 69, 5–11 (1941).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M. Tilman's predicted productivity–diversity relationship shown by desert rodents. Nature 309, 150–151 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/309150a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/309150a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing