Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of Water Vapour on the Sensitivity of a Flame Ionization Detector for Gas Chromatography

Abstract

IN a previous communication1, we showed that the sensitivity of a macro-argon detector for gas chromatography is quite markedly affected by the presence of water vapour in the carrier gas stream of argon entering the detector. It was shown that a change in the water-vapour concentration in the argon carrier gas-stream from 8 to 10 p.p.m. v/v reduced the sensitivity of the detector to a constant level of 5.8 p.p.m. v/v of di-ethyl ether vapour by some 20 per cent. It is commonly stated that the sensitivity of a flame ionization detector is little affected by the presence of water vapour2,3, but no quantitative data are given. Entiknap4 reports that the sensitivity of a flame-ionization detector to alcohols was between three and six times as high for aqueous solutions of alcohol as for pure alcohol, when alcohol samples were placed on the chromatographic column. In order to be able to use the flame ionization detector as a standard with which to compare the performance of other detectors, it was necessary to have quantitative data on the effect of water vapour on the sensitivity of this detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill, D. W., and Newell, H. A., Nature, 205, 593 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Condon, R. D., Scholly, P. R., and Averill, W., in Gas Chromatography 1960, edit. by Scott, R. P. W., 30 (Butterworths, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lovelock, J. E., Anal. Chem., 33, 162 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Entiknap, J. B., in Alcohol and Road Traffic, 238 (Brit. Med. Assoc., London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, R. A., and Hill, D. W., Nature, 189, 488 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crawshaw, J. K., and Davidson, H. G., J. Sci. Instrum., 36, 121 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright, B. M., in Alcohol and Road Traffic, 251 (Brit. Med. Assoc., London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HILL, D., NEWELL, H. Effect of Water Vapour on the Sensitivity of a Flame Ionization Detector for Gas Chromatography. Nature 206, 708–709 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1038/206708a0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/206708a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing