Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Primary Structure Heterogeneity in Ribosomal Proteins from Escherichia coli

Abstract

FUNCTIONAL heterogeneity of ribosomal proteins from Escherichia coli is extensive and in vitro polypeptide synthesis requires at least six different protein fractions1. The structural heterogeneity of ribosomal proteins is even more impressive; on gel electrophoresis of 70S ribosomal protein from E. coli about thirty protein bands separate and opinion favours the presence of at least as many distinct proteins2–10. Little is known, however, about the extent to which the primary structure of these proteins is related. In this communication a comparison between the amino-acid composition and tryptic fingerprints of eight simplified protein fractions, isolated from 70S ribosomal proteins of E. coli, will be made. In addition the purification and some properties of three single ribosomal proteins, one acidic and two basics, will be presented. Fig. 1 gives the results of applying 1 g 70S ribosomal protein (prepared using glacial acetic acid2,10) to a column of CM cellulose. Four different peaks were reproducibly resolved. The electrophoresis patterns on polyacrylamide gels (15 per cent) of selected fractions are shown in Fig. 2. As Table 1 shows, the amino-acid compositions of these fractions, determined on a Technicon autoanalyser, are quite distinct. Each fraction contains at least one amino-acid, the percentage of which is substantially greater or less than the percentage of that amino-acid in any other fraction. The relative difference in the contents of basic over acidic amino-acid residues increases regularly from a value of −7 mole per cent to 12 mole per cent. Tryptic fingerprints confirm the presence of extensive differences in primary structure between each of these fractions; with the exception of fractions 1a and 1b, each fraction shows a different tryptic fingerprint with strong spots uniquely missing or present on comparison with any of the other fingerprints (Fig. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nomura, M., and Traub, P., Proc. Symp. Rutgers (in the press, 1967).

  2. Waller, J. P., and Harris, J. I., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 47, 18 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spitnik-Elson, P., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 74, 105 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Waller, J. P., J. Mol. Biol., 10, 319 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spitnik-Elson, P., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 80, 594 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leboy, P., Cox, E. C., and Flaks, J. G., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 52, 1367 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Möller, W., Abstracts Second International Biophysics Congress, 177, Vienna (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Traut, R. R., J. Mol. Biol., 21, 571 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Möller, W., and Chrambach, A., J. Mol. Biol., 23, 377 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Möller, W., and Widdowson, J., J. Mol. Biol., 24 (1967).

  11. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clegg, J. B., Naughton, M. A., and Weatherall, D. J., J. Mol. Biol., 19, 91 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray, W. R., Methods in Enzymology, Enzyme Structure (Academic Press, New York, in the press).

  14. Traut, R. R., and Monro, R. E., J. Mol. Biol., 10, 63 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zamir, A., Leder, P., and Elson, D., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 56, 1794 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson, J. D., Molecular Biology of the Gene (Benjamin, Washington, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Traut, R. R., Moore, P. B., Delius, H., Noller, H., and Tissières, A., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 57, 1294 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MÖLLER, W., CASTLEMAN, H. Primary Structure Heterogeneity in Ribosomal Proteins from Escherichia coli. Nature 215, 1293–1295 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2151293a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2151293a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing