Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dynamic measurement of matter creation

Abstract

IF a rotor could be spun so that it had an inertial decay time 1011 yr, 1018 s, it could test matter creation cosmologies1–3 at a significant level. The advantage of this method over previous ones4–8 is that the result is independent of the form in which matter is created, providing it stays in place. We have designed an experiment to test this process; it is under construction and is described here. It consists of an inertially spinning rotor suspended inside another rotor, a modification of the double magnetic suspension8. Past measurements or estimates have not unequivocally answered the question of matter creation. Cohen and King4 established an upper limit of 4×10−23 g per g per s on the creation rate of hydrogen in mercury metal. Gittus5 suggested that matter created in rocks takes the form of interstitial atoms which diffuse into dislocations. Towe6 disputed this, noting that if mass proportional creation were occurring, 30% of the atoms in old terrestrial rocks would occupy interstitial positions and this would result in lattice disruptions. Gittus7 later proposed that the matter multiplication rate for crystalline materials could be found by determining the ratio of the shear modulus to the crystal viscosity. He suggested that a reasonable estimate for the sensitivity of the method might be 3×10−18 atoms per atom per s, although this has not been tested. In a geophysical argument, Wesson8 can account for the observed expansion rate of the earth by appealing to a mass proportional matter creation whose rate is 7×10−18 g per g per s, but he notes that this is in conflict with the result of Cohen and King; it exceeds Dirac's prediction by several times.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirac, P. A. M. Proc. R. Soc. A165, 199 (1938).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Canuto, V. & Lodenquai, J. Astrophys. J. 211, 342–356 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyle, F. & Narlikar, J. V. Mon. not. R. astr. Soc. 155, 323–335 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, S. A. & King, J. G. Nature 222, 1158–1159 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gittus, J. H. Proc. R. Soc. A343, 155–158 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Towe, K. M. Nature 257, 115–116 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gittus, J. H. Proc. R. Soc. A348, 95–99 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wesson, P. S. Q.J. R. astr. Soc. 14, 9–64 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beams, J. W. Rev. Scient. Instrum. 34, 1071–1074 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beams, J. W., Spitzer, Jr, D. M. & Wade, Jr J. P. Rev. Scient. Instrum. 33, 151–155 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCombie, C. W. Rep. Prog. Phys. 16, 266–320 (1953).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Munk, W. H. & MacDonald, G. J. F. The Rotation of the Earth 204 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Braginsky, V. B. Tech. Trans. NASA TT F–672 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. 1972).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RITTER, R., GILLIES, G., ROOD, R. et al. Dynamic measurement of matter creation. Nature 271, 228–229 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271228a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271228a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing