Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Asymmetrical competition in insects

Abstract

It is widely believed that when populations of two species of animals compete, each has an adverse effect on the other1,2. In other words, each zero growth isocline (dNi/dt = 0 where Ni is the population density of species i) is assumed to be some negative function of the population density of the other species. Cases where one species has a marked effect on the other, but there is no detectable reciprocal effect are sometimes distinguished as ‘amensalism’2,3. This is regarded as unusual. Standard textbooks of ecology either do not mention it1,4–6, define it but do not discuss it2, or occasionally give a brief account3. Ricklefs7 states that “competition can manifest itself by reducing the numbers of one or both competing species” without saying which is the more usual. Here we show that for insects in natural conditions, strongly asymmetrical competition (amensalism or near amensalism) is the norm rather than the exception by a ratio of at least 2:1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krebs, C. J. Ecology. The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance (Harper & Row, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Odum, E. P. Fundamentals of Ecology (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson, M. The Analysis of Biological Populations (Edward Arnold, London, 1972).

  4. Colinvaux, P. A. Introduction to Ecology (Wiley, New York, 1973).

  5. Collier, B. D., Cox, G. W., Johnson, A. W. & Miller, P. C. Dynamic Ecology (Prentice-Hall, London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whittaker, R. H. Communities and Ecosystems (Macmillan, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ricklefs, R. E. Ecology (Thomas Nelson, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M. (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities (Belknap, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975).

  9. Hutchinson, G. A. An Introduction to Population Ecology (Yale University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975).

  10. Mound, L. A. & Waloff, N. (eds) Diversity of Insect Faunas (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).

  11. Lawton, J. H. & Hassell, M. P. in Ecological Entomology (ed. Huff aker, C. B.) (in the press).

  12. Lawton, J. H. & Strong, D. R. Jr Am. Nat. 117 (in the press).

  13. Pontin, A. J. J. Anim. Ecol. 38, 747–754 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Force, D. C. Science 184, 624–632 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stiling, P. D. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 793–805 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inouye, D. W. Ecology 59, 672–678 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pajunen, V. I. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 16, 195–200 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zwolfer, H. Fortschr. Zool. 25, 331–353 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. McClure, M. S. & Price, P. W. Ecology 56, 1385–1397 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Istock, C. A. Ecology 48, 929–937 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson, D. W. Am. Nat. 116, 92–105 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch, J. F. Vail, S. G. & Balinsky, E. C. Ecol. Ent. 5, 353–371 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brian, A. D. J. Anim. Ecol. 26, 71–98 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morse, D. H. Science 197, 678–680 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rathcke, B. J. Ecology 57, 76–87 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andrewartha, H. G. & Birch, L. C. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals (University of Chicago Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Istock, C. A. Am. Nat. 111, 279–287 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Benke, A. C. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 335–350 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Messenger, P. S. in Insects Science and Society (ed. Pimentel, D.) (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blakley, N. R. & Dingle, H. Oecologia 37, 133–136 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Connell, J. H. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pimm, S. L. Am. Zool. 18, 797–808 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Crowell, K. L. & Pimm, S. L. Oikos 27, 251–258 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sinclair, A. R. E. The African Buffalo (University of Chicago Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morse, D. H. Am. Nat. 108, 818–830 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller, R. S. Adv. ecol Res. 4, 1–74 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Strobeck, C. Ecology 54, 650–654 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gilpin, M. E. & Case, T. J. Nature 261, 40–42 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rejmanek, M. & Stary, P. Nature 280, 311–313 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reiser, I. et al. J. econ. Ent. 67, 355–360 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Majer, J. D. J. appl. Ecol. 13, 123–144 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McClure, M. S. Ecol. Ent. 6, 47–54 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Seifert, R. P. & Seifert, F. H. Am. Nat. 110, 461–483 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Seifert, R. P. & Seifert, F. H. Ecology 60, 462–467 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Seifert, R. P. & Seifert, F. H. Biotropica 11, 51–59 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawton, J., Hassell, M. Asymmetrical competition in insects. Nature 289, 793–795 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/289793a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289793a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing