Abstract
NEEDHAM1 has recently claimed that Minot's paradox2: “Senescence is at its maximum in the very young stages and the rate of senescence diminishes with age”, is false. Instead of the relationship Ṡ = Ġ (where Ṡ = rate of senescence, Ġ = specific growth-rate) indicated by Minot he advocates the use of the relationship Ṡ = k/Ġ in which, however, Ġ refers to growth “in the broadest sense .... perhaps in fact anabolism in toto”. It will be argued here that Minot's paradox is derived correctly from the simplest model of a living system; and that Needham's relationship gives only an approximation to the increase in senility in a more complex model. Secondly, it will be suggested that the changes under discussion bear no direct relationship to the rates of anabolism and catabolism at any time, and that changes in senescent systems are not related to changes in specific growth-rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Needham, A. E., Nature, 192, 579 (1961).
Minot, C. S., The Problem of Age, Growth and Death (John Murray, London, 1908).
Roughton, F. J., Disc. Farad. Soc., 17, 116 (1954).
Rakowski, Z. Physik Chem., 57, 321 (1907).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NICHOLLS, P. Senescence and Senility. Nature 194, 506–507 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/194506a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/194506a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.