Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cause of Twinning of Crystals

Abstract

IN the course of an investigation1 of optically active uniaxial crystals, I expressed the view that the possibility of twinning of a crystal was connected with a definite pseudo-symmetrical character of its structure as a whole. This statement was seriously attacked by Prof. Friedel, as may be clear from the following quotation of his paper:2 “La formation de la macle est totalement indifférente à la symétrie ou à la pseudo-symétrie de l'édifice cristallin ou des groupes d'atomes qui le constituent. Elle est due uniquement à la rencontre de symétries ou de pseudo-symétries dans les périodes (mailles, simples ou multiples) de cet édifice.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. G. Burgers, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 116, 553; 1927.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. "Au sujet d'un Mémoire de M. W. G. Burgers sur les cristaux uniaxes à pouvoir rotatoire", Comptes rendus, 186, 1788; 1928.

  3. Compare, for example, the explanation of some twin structures exhibited by quartz crystals, by Sir W. H. Bragg, and R. E. Gibbs, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 109, 405; 1925.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. L. Bragg, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 105, 16; 1924.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Similar remarks have been made by F. Heide, Z. Krist., 66, p. 225; 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  6. It may be remarked in this connexion that even Prof. Friedel himself, notwithstanding his definite statement about the cause of twinning quoted above, has made similar remarks in other passages of his treatises, as, for example, in "Leçons de crist.", p. 449.

  7. Z. Krist., 80, 355; 1931.

  8. "Leçons de cristallographie", pp. 392–398; compare also Comptes rendus, 182, 741; 1926.

  9. Proc. Roy. Soc., loc. cit., pp.560–561.

  10. Z. Krist., 72, 218; 1929.

  11. See Z. Krist., 73, 147; 1930.

  12. Z. Krist., 74, 20; 1930.

  13. Compare, for example, W. H. Bragg, "An Introduction to Crystal Analysis", (London, G. Bell, 1928, pp.134 and following); also W. T. Astbury, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 112, 448; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURGERS, W. Cause of Twinning of Crystals. Nature 129, 363–364 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1038/129363a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/129363a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing