Subfractionation of rat liver plasma membrane: Uneven distribution of plasma membrane-bound enzymes on the liver cell surface

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(75)90058-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Plasma membranes were islotaed from rat liver mainly under isotonic conditions. As marker enzymes for the plasma membrane, 5′-nucleotidase and (Na++K+)-ATPase were used. The yield of plasma membrane was 0.6–0.9 mg protein per g wet weight of liver. The recovery of 5′-nucleotidase and (Na++K+)-ATPase activity was 18 and 48% of the total activity of the whole-liver homogenate, respectively. Judged from the acitvity of glucose-6 phosphatase and succinate dehydrogenase in the plasma membrane, and from the electron microscopic observation of it, the contamination by microsomes and mitochondria was very low. A further homogenization of the plasma membrane yielded two fractions, the light and heavy fractions, in a discontinuous sucrose gradient centrifugation. The light fraction showed higher specific activities of 5′-nucleotidase, alkaline phosphatase, (Na++K+)-ATPase and Mg2+-ATPase, whereas the heavy one showed a higher specific activity of adenylate cyclase. Ligation of the bile duct for 48 h decreased the specific activities of (Na++K+)-ATPase and Mg2+-ATPase in the light fraction, whereas it had no significant influence on the activities of these enzymes in the heavy fraction. The specific activity of alkaline phosphatase was elevated in both fractions by the obstruction of the bile flow. Electron microscopy on sections of the plasma membrane subfractions showed that the light fraction consisted of vesicles of various sizes and that the heavy fractions contained membrane sheets and paired membrane strips connected by junctional complexes, as well as vesicles. The origin of these two fractions is discussed and it is suggested that the light fraction was derived from the bile front of the liver cell surface and the heavy one contained the blood front and the lateral surface of it.

References (42)

  • A.B. Novikoff et al.

    Am. J. Med.

    (1960)
  • B. Fleischer et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1969)
  • T.K. Ray

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1970)
  • W.H. Evans

    FEBS Lett.

    (1969)
  • W.H. Evans et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1973)
  • R.M. Flynn et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1954)
  • C.H. Fiske et al.

    J. BIol. Chem.

    (1925)
  • R.L. Post et al.
  • M. Gutman et al.

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1971)
  • O.H. Lowry et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1951)
  • W.C. Schneider

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1946)
  • W.M. Sperry et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1950)
  • L. Warren

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1959)
  • L.E. Hokin et al.
  • M. Wachstein

    Gastroenterology

    (1959)
  • C.L. Lauter et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1972)
  • P. Emmelot et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1971)
  • S.I. Pohl et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1971)
  • L. Reik et al.

    Science

    (1970)
  • L.S. Schanker
  • D.M. Neville

    J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.

    (1960)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Effects of experimental dicrocoeliosis on oxidative drug metabolism in hamster liver

      1996, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - C Pharmacology Toxicology and Endocrinology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text