The oligopoly solution tested

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(88)90013-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Bresnahan's econometric technique for estimating the type of pricing behavior is applied to an early antitrust case. The empirical results are plausible and suggest that it may be appropriate to use this technique in future antitrust cases.

References (8)

  • Timothy F. Bresnahan

    The oligopoly solution concept is identified

    Economics Letters

    (1982)
  • Donald L. Alexander

    An examination of the linseed oil case

    (1988)
  • J. Durbin

    Testing for serial correlation in systems of simultaneous regression equations

    Biometrika

    (1957)
  • Milton Friedman et al.

    Monetary trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their relation to income, prices, and interest rates, 1867–1975

    (1982)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Banks as 'fat cats': Branching and price decisions in a two-stage model of competition

    2012, Journal of Economics and Business
    Citation Excerpt :

    In order to assess oligopoly conduct, the latest empirical studies mostly employ the so-called ‘new empirical industrial organization’ (NEIO) approach, which relies on non-structural models inferring market power from the observation of firms’ conduct and requiring the estimation of equations based on theoretical frameworks of price and output determination. More specifically, these models aim to test conduct by directly addressing firms’ behaviour through the estimation of a parameter that can be interpreted as a conjectural variation coefficient (Iwata, 1974; Appelbaum, 1979, 1982; Roberts, 1984) or as the deviation of the perceived marginal revenue schedule of a firm in the industry from the demand schedule (Bresnahan, 1982, 1989; Lau, 1982; Alexander, 1988). However, they generally consider only one strategic variable, usually price or quantity.4

  • Market power in local banking monopolies

    2009, Journal of Banking and Finance
    Citation Excerpt :

    This has been done in two ways. The first is to estimate a parameter that represents the behavior of firms (and therefore the degree of their market power): it can be interpreted as a conjectural variation coefficient (Iwata, 1974; Appelbaum, 1979, 1982; Roberts, 1984), or as the deviation of the perceived marginal revenue schedule of a firm in the industry from the demand schedule (Bresnahan, 1982, 1989; Lau, 1982; Alexander, 1988). Applications of this technique (and its variants) in banking have been performed by Shaffer (1989, 1993), Berg and Kim (1994), Shaffer and DiSalvo (1994), Coccorese (1998b, 2005), Neven and Roller (1999), Toolsema (2002), Angelini and Cetorelli (2003), Canhoto (2004) and Uchida and Tsutsui (2005).

  • Banking competition and macroeconomic conditions: A disaggregate analysis

    2004, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
    Citation Excerpt :

    It requires the estimation of a simultaneous-equation model based on aggregate industry data, where a parameter representing the degree of market power of firms is included. Empirical implementations of this technique have been performed by Alexander (1988), Shaffer (1989, 1993), Coccorese (1998b) and Bikker and Haaf (2002) particularly, the last three authors have applied this method within a banking context. The Rosse and Panzar test often has a clear interpretation when applied to the study of markets, given that H represents the percentage variation of the equilibrium revenue derived from a unit percent increase in the price of all factors used by the firm.

  • Banking conduct before the European single banking license: A cross-country comparison

    2001, North American Journal of Economics and Finance
    Citation Excerpt :

    The total number of observations was 172, equal to one observation per country for each year in which the respective country is included (13 observations each for Japan, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the U.K., and the U.S.; 12 observations each for Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Italy, and Switzerland; 10 each for France and Portugal; 8 for Canada; and 6 for Germany). This total considerably exceeds the number of observations used in several other recent studies of conduct: Alexander (1988) and Shaffer (1993a) apply similar tests to samples of 22 and 25 observations, respectively, while the Canadian trust company and mortgage company samples of Nathan and Neave (1989) contain 39 and 33 observations, respectively. Factors unique to each nation might lead us to expect a higher or lower degree of contestability in particular cases.

  • Testing for market power using a dynamic oligopoly model

    1999, International Journal of Industrial Organization
  • Conduct in a banking duopoly

    1994, Journal of Banking and Finance
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text