Skip to main content
Log in

High-quality bias in vertically differentiated oligopolies—a note on skills, trade, and welfare

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a vertically differentiated Cournot oligopoly where the high-quality variant of the good requires the use of high-quality labor, firms may either all supply the same quality or differentiate their product. In differentiated configurations the number of firms choosing to supply the high-quality variant is generally above the optimum. The opening of trade between symmetric countries entails a pro-competitive effect that raises welfare through a reduction in average quality. This result contrasts with previous findings concerning the opening of trade in vertically differentiated oligopolistic industries (Gabszewicz, Shaked, Sutton, and Thisse,International Economic Review 22 [1981]; Shaked and Sutton, in Kierzkowski, ed.,Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Oxford 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, R. E. (1994):Towards an Integrated Europe. CEPR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. (1986): “Vertical Differentiation with Cournot Competition.”Economic Notes 15:69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J., and Krugman, P. (1983): “A Reciprocal-Dumping Model of International Trade.”Journal of International Economics 15:313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R., and Kotwal, A. (1996): “Product Quality and the Theory of Comparative Advantage.”European Economic Review 40:1745–1761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courakis, A. S. (1991): “Labour Skills and Human Capital in the Explanation of Trade Patterns.”Oxford Economic Papers 43:443–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A., Hitchens, D., and Wagner, K. (1985): “Productivity, Machinery and Skills in a Sample of British and German Manufacturing Plants.”National Institute Economic Review 0 (111):48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraja, G. (1996): “Product Line Competition in Vertically Differentiated Markets.”International Journal of Industrial Organization 14:389–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontagne', L., Freudenberg, M., and Peridy, N. (1997): “Trade Patterns Inside the Single Market.” Document de Travail no. 97-7, CEPII.

  • Gabszewicz, J., and Thisse, J.-F. (1979): “Price Competition, Quality, and Income Disparities.”Journal of Economic Theory 20:340–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J., Shaked, A., Sutton, J., and Thisse, J.-F. (1981): “International Trade in Differentiated Products.”International Economic Review 22:527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E. (1983): “Quality and Quantity Competition.”Bell Journal of Economics 14: 590–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and Torstensson, J. (1998): “Economic Geography, Comparative Advantage and Trade Within Industries: Evidence from the OECD.” Paper presented at the ZEI-CEPR Workshop on Product Quality, Labour Productivity and Trade, Bonn, Germany, January.

  • Gros, D., and Gonciarz, A. (1996): “A Note on the Trade Potential of Central and Eastern Europe.”European Journal of Political Economy 12:709–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1979): “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade.”Journal of International Economics 9:469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G., Van Ark, B., and Wagner, K. (1996): “Workforce Skills, Product Quality and Economic Performance.” InAcquiring Skills, edited by A. Booth and D. J. Snower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. (1992): “Sunk Costs and Trade Liberalisation.”Economic Journal 102: 578–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1993): “Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition.”Journal of Industrial Economics 41:113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. M., and Shleifer, A. (1997): “Quality and Trade.”Journal of Development Economics 53:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., and Rosen, S. (1978): “Monopoly and Product Quality.”Journal of Economic Theory 18:301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oulton, N. (1996): “Workforce Skills and Export Competitiveness.” InAcquiring Skills, edited by A. Booth and D. J. Snower. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, A., and Sutton, J. (1983): “Natural Oligopolies.”Econometrica 51:1469–1483.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1984): “Natural Oligopolies and International Trade.” InMonopolistic Competition and International Trade, edited by H. Kierzkowski. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, H., and Wagner, K. (1987): “A Second Look to Productivity, Machinery and Skills in Britain and Germany.”National Institute Economic Review 0 (122):84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, A. (1993): “The Skill and Higher Educational Content of UK Net Exports.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55:141–160.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turrini, A. High-quality bias in vertically differentiated oligopolies—a note on skills, trade, and welfare. Zeitschr. f. Nationalökonomie 71, 133–147 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01227448

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation