Skip to main content
Log in

Teliospores of smut fungi teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores studied by electron microscopy; phylogenetic discussion of characteristics of teliospores

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Special features of teliospores in smut fungi are described, including teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores. Balls of teliospores in species of many different genera cohere by remnants of hyphal walls, sheaths, and sometimes interlocking ornamentation. Teliospores are connected in pairs in species ofMycosyrinx andGeminago by special local structures. Appendages can be formed locally by persistent material from the sheath (Cintractia, Anthracoidea, Sphacelotheca), thickened parts of the spore wall (e.g.,Georgefischeria, Jamesdicksonia, Rhamphospora, Tolyposporella), or persistent walls of sporogenous hyphae (Rhamphospora, genera of the Tilletia relationship). Species ofGeorgefischeria, Jamesdicksonia, andTolyposporella have teliospore walls composed of more than three layers of different electron density. “Germ areas” corresponding to thinner parts of the spore wall are known, e.g., for species ofAnthracoidea, Cintractia, andUstilago infecting members of the family Poaceae, while distinct germ pores, one per teliospore, are found in some species ofThecaphora, “Tolyposporium”, andSporisorium. Teliospores ofMycosyrinx cissi have a germination ring. Characteristics of teliospores are used to discuss the phylogeny of smut fungi. A phylogenetic tree in accordance with teliospore characteristics is compared to those obtained from ultrastructural characteristics of host-parasite interaction, of septal pores, and from sequence data. Aspects of teliospore development help to define taxa at a high systematic level (Entorrhizales, Ustilaginales, Tilletiales/Entylomatales, Microbotryaceae), while details of ornamentation ontogeny delimit groups of genera (e.g., genera related toUstilago on members of the Poaceae andSporisorium, Cintractia andAnthracoidea, Tilletia) or single genera (e.g.,Melanopsichium, Dermatosorus, Mycosyrinx, Doassinga, Rhamphospora). Types of ornamentation (warty, reticulate), middle layers, teliospore balls, and germ pores evolved repeatedly by convergence. The smut teliospore itself probably evolved independently at least twice, or perhaps three (or more) times, in the Microbotryales, in the Entorrhizales, and in a common ancestor of the remainder of the Ustilaginomycetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer R, Oberwinkler F, Vánky K (1997) Ultrastructural markers and systematics in smut fungi and allied taxa. Can J Bot 75: 1273–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F, Piepenbring M, Berbee ML (1999) Ustilaginomycetes. In: McLaughlin D, McLaughlin E, Lemke PA (eds) Mycota, vol 7, systematics and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Begerow D, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F (1997) Phylogenetic studies on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences of smut fungi and related taxa. Can J Bot 75: 2045–2056

    Google Scholar 

  • Deml G, Oberwinkler F, Bauer R (1985) Studies in Heterobasi-diomycetes, part 38:Sphacelotheca polygoni-persicariae G. Deml & Oberw. spec. nov. Phytopathol Z 113: 231–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Denchev CM (1997) New combinations inBauhinus (Microbotryaceae). Mycotaxon 65: 419–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess WM, Weber DJ (1976) Form and function in basidiomycete spores. In: Weber DJ, Hess WM (eds) The fungal spore: form and function. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 643–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna A, Payak MM, Prakash N (1971) Teliospore morphology of some smut fungi III:Ustilago nuda. Indian Phytopathol 24: 481–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukkonen I (1963) Taxonomic studies on the genusAnthracoidea (Ustilaginales). Ann Bot Soc Zool Bot Fenn Vanamo 34: 1–122

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1969) The spore surface in theAnthracoidea section Echinosporae (Ustilaginales): a study with light and electron microscopy. Ann Bot Fenn 6: 269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Gjaerum H (1977)Cintractia species parasitic onScleria (Cyperaceae). Norw J Bot 24: 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon RFN, Fullerton RA (1978) The genusSphacelotheca (Ustilaginales): criteria for its delimitation and the consequences thereof. Mycotaxon 51: 421–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell ES (1987) Relations of hyphae to host cells in smut galls caused by species ofTilletia, Tolyposporium, andUstilago. Can J Bot 65: 2581–2591

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RT (1992) The genusBauhinus gen. nov.: for species ofUstilago on dicot hosts. Mycotaxon 45: 97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996) An inventory of the phylum Ustomycota. Mycotaxon 59: 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagler A (1986) Untersuchungen zur Gattungsabgrenzung vonGinanniella Ciferri undUrocystis Rabenhorst sowie zur Ontogenie vonThecaphora seminis-convolvuli (Desm.) Ito. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine WA, Hess WM (1984) Ultrastructure of germinating sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) teliospores. Trans Br Mycol Soc 82: 385–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepenbring M (1994) Brandpilze (Ustilaginales und Tilletiales) von Costa Rica: Ökologie, Morphologie, Ultrastruktur und Systematik. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995)Trichocintractia, a new genus forCintractia utriculicola (Ustilaginales). Can J Bot 73: 1089–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bauer R (1995) Noteworthy germinations of some Costa Rican Ustilaginales. Mycol Res 99: 853–858

    Google Scholar 

  • — —, Oberwinkler F (1998a) Teliospores of smut fungi: general aspects of teliospore walls and sporogenesis. Protoplasma 204: 155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • — — — (1998b) Teliospores of smut fungi: teliospore walls and the development of ornamentation studied by electron microscopy. Protoplasma: 204: 170–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramberg JE, McLaughlin DJ (1980) Ultrastructural study of promycelial development and basidiospore initiation inUstilago maydis. Can J Bot 58: 1548–1561

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson RW, Luttrell ES (1987) Ultrastructure of teliospore ontogeny inTilletia indica. Mycologia 79: 753–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile DBO (1954) Cellular mechanics, taxonomy and evolution in the Uredinales and Ustilaginales. Mycologia 46: 736–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Vánky K (1986) The genusMoesziomyces (Ustilaginales). Nord J Bot 6: 67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987) Illustrated genera of smut fungi. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994) European smut fungi. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1996)Mycosyrinx and other pair-spored Ustilaginales. Mycoscience 37: 173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1997) New Ustilaginales from Australia. Mycotaxon 62: 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998a) Proposal to conserve the generic nameThecaphora againstSorosporium (Fungi, Ustilaginales). Taxon 47: 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998b) A survey of the spore-ball-forming smut fungi. Mycol Res 102: 513–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Vánky K (1998c) The genusMicrobotryum (smut fungi). Mycotaxon 67: 33–60

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bauer R (1995)Oberwinkleria, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 53: 361–368

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1996)Ingoldiomyces, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 59: 277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Oberwinkler F (1994) Ustilaginales on Polygonaceae: a taxonomic revision. Nova Hedwigia Beih 107: 1–96

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Websdane K (1996) New Ustilaginales on Cyperaceae from Australia. Mycotaxon 58: 167–183

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Bauer R, Begerow D (1997)Fulvisporium, a new genus of Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 64: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronin M (1881) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Ustilagineen. Abh Senckenb Naturforsch Ges 12: 559–591 + 4 Pls

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Part 166 in the series “Studies in Heterobasidiomycetes” from the Botanical Institute, University of Tübingen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepenbring, M., Bauer, R. & Oberwinkler, F. Teliospores of smut fungi teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores studied by electron microscopy; phylogenetic discussion of characteristics of teliospores. Protoplasma 204, 202–218 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01280324

Keywords

Navigation