Summary
Nuclear bodies are found in interphase nuclei of root apices of a number of plant species. They often show differences in structure and position relative to the nucleolus and this has led to an attempt to define two classes of body. However, in some species their separation into two classes on structural grounds alone breaks down, indicating that although they may occupy different positions within the nucleus they may in these particular cases be only different forms of the same body. The two extremes of the range of bodies examined represent what have been called “nucleolus-associated body” (karyosome) and “dense body”. The nucleolus-associated body is typically attached to, or adjacent to, the nucleolus. It is composed of fibrils 4–8 nm wide and often has an open structure showing compound threads or fibrils separated from each other by electron-lucent spaces. The dense body is more compact in structure and typically lies free in the nucleoplasm. Both types of body have an affinity for silver ions which, together with their staining reaction following treatment with EDTA, indicates that they consist of ribonucleoprotein. The characteristics of nuclear bodies found in different plant species have some relationship with the structure and DNA content of the interphase nucleus. Nucleolus-associated bodies are characteristic of species with an areticulate nuclear structure (2 C DNA content <6 pg), while dense bodies are common in species with a reticulate nuclear structure (2 C DNA content >6 pg). The possible functions of the two forms of nuclear body are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelier, N., Hernandez-Verdun, D., Bouteille, M., 1982: Visualization of Ag-NOR proteins on nucleolar transcriptional units in molecular spreads. Chromosoma86, 661–672.
Barlow, P. W., 1981 a: Argyrophilic nuclear structures in root apices. In Structure and Function of Plant Roots (Brouwer, R. et al., eds.), pp. 43–47. The Hague-Boston-London; Nijhoff/Junk.
—, 1981 b: Argyrophilic intranuclear bodies of plant cells. Experientia37, 1017–1018.
—, 1983 a: Nucleolus-associated bodies (karyosomes) in dividing and differentiating plant cells. Protoplasma115, 1–10.
—, 1983 b: Changes in the frequency of two types of nuclear body during the interphase of meristematic plant cells. Protoplasma118, 104–113.
Bennett, M. D., Smith, J. B., 1976: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B274, 227–274.
Bernhard, W., 1969: A new staining procedure for electron microscopical cytology. J. Ultrastruct. Res.27, 250–265.
Bouteille, M., Kalifat, S. R., Delarue, J., 1967: Ultrastructural variations of nuclear bodies in human diseases. J. Ultrastruct. Res.19, 474–486.
—,Laval, M., Dupuy-Coin, A. M., 1974: Localization of nuclear functions as revealed by ultrastructural autoradiography and cytochemistry. In: The Cell Nucleus, Vol.1 (Busch, H., ed.), pp. 3–71. New York and London: Academic Press.
Büttner, D. W., 1968: Elektronmikroskopische Beobachtung von Sphaeridien im Karyoplasm der Sauropsidenzelle. Z. Zellforsch.85, 527–533.
—,Horstmann, E., 1967: Das Sphaeridion, eine weit verbreitete Differenzierung des Karyoplasma. Z. Zellforsch.77, 589–605.
Chaly, N., Setterfield, G., 1975: Organization of the nucleus, nucleolus and protein synthesizing apparatus in relation to cell development in roots ofPisum sativum. Can. J. Bot.53, 200–218.
Fussell, C. P., 1975: The position of interphase chromosomes and late replicating DNA in centromere and telomere regions ofAllium cepa L. Chromosoma50, 201–210.
Grundwag, M., Barlow, P. W., 1973: Changes in nucleolar ultrastructure in cells of the quiescent centre after removal of the root cap. Cytobiologie8, 130–139.
Hubble, H. R., Rothblum, L. I., Hsu, T. C., 1979: Identification of a silver-binding protein associated with the cytological silver staining of actively transcribing nucleolar regions. Cell Biol. Internat. Reps3, 615–622.
Hyde, B. B., 1967: Changes in nucleolar ultrastructure associated with differentiation in the root tip. J. Ultrastruct. Res.18, 25–54.
Jordan, E. G., 1967: The nucleolus and mitosis inSpirogyra. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.
—, 1976: Nuclear structure inDaucus carota. Cytobiologie14, 171–177.
—,Timmis, J. N., Trewavas, A., 1980: The plant nucleus. In: The Biochemistry of Plants, Vol. 1, The Plant Cell (Tolbert, N. E., ed.), pp. 490–579. New York and London: Academic Press.
Kierszenbaum, A. L., 1969: Relationship between nucleolus and nuclear bodies in human mixed salivary tumors. J. Ultrastruct. Res.29, 459–469.
Klyueva, T. S., Chentsov, Yu. S., 1979: Morphology and localization of ribonucleoprotein components in interphase nuclei of different types in certain higher plants. Cytology and Genetics13, no. 6, 59–66.
Krishan, A., Guzman, B. G., Hedley-Whyte, E. T., 1967: Nuclear bodies: A component of cell nuclei in hamster tissues and human tumors. J. Ultrastruct. Res.19, 563–572.
Kupila-Ahvenniemi, S., Hohtola, A., 1979: Structure of the nucleoli of developing microsporangiate strobili and root tips of Scotch pine. Protoplasma100, 289–301.
Kuroiwa, T., Tanaka, N., 1971: Fine structure of interphase nuclei I. The morphological classification of nucleus in interphase ofCrepis capillaris. Cytologia36, 143–160.
Lafontaine, J. G., 1965: A light and electron microscopic study of small, spherical nuclear bodies in meristematic cells ofAllium cepa, Vicia faba andRaphanus sativus. J. Cell Biol.26, 1–17.
—, 1968: Structural components of the nucleus in mitotic plant cells. In: The Nucleus (Dalton, A. J., Haguenau, F., eds.), pp. 152–198. New York and London: Academic Press.
Lai, V., Srivastava, L. M., 1976: Nuclear changes during differentiation in xylem vessel elements. Cytobiologie12, 220–243.
Le Goascogne, C., Beaulieu, E. E., 1977: Hormonally controlled “nuclear bodies” during the development of prepuberal rat uterus. Biol. Cell.30, 195–207.
Lischwe, M. A., Richards, R. L., Busch, R. K., Busch, H., 1981: Localization of phosphoprotein C 23 to nucleolar structures and to the nucleolus organizer region. Exp. Cell Res.136, 101–109.
Luck, B. T., Lafontaine, J.-G., 1982: An ultracytochemical study of nuclear bodies in meristematic plant cells (Cicer arientinum). Can. J. Bot.60, 611–619.
Monneron, A., Bernhard, W., 1969: Fine structural organization of the interphase nucleus in some mammalian cells. J. Ultrastruct. Res.27, 266–288.
Moreno Díaz de la Espina, S., Risueño, M. C., Medina, F. J., 1982: Ultrastructural, cytochemical and autoradiographic characterization of coiled bodies in the plant cell nucleus. Biol. Cell44, 229–237.
Pearson, E. C., Davies, H. G., 1982: A critical study of Bernhard's EDTA regressive staining technique for RNA. J. Cell Sci.54, 207–240.
Phillips, H. L., Torrey, J. G., 1974: The ultrastructure of the root cap in cultured roots ofConvolvulus arvensis L. Am. J. Bot.61, 879–887.
Popoff, N., Stewart, S., 1968: The fine structure of nuclear inclusions in the brain of experimental golden hamsters. J. Ultrastruct. Res.23, 347–361.
Reynolds, E. S., 1963: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol.17, 208–212.
Risueño, M. C., Fernández-Gómez, M. E., Giménez-Martín, G., 1973: Nucleoli under the electron microscope by silver impregnation. Mikroskopie29, 292–298.
Sankaranarayanan, K., Hyde, B. B., 1965: Ultrastructural studies of a nuclear body in peas with characteristics of both chromatin and nucleoli. J. Ultrastruct. Res.12, 748–761.
Schultze, C., 1979: Giant nuclear bodies (sphaeridia) in Sertoli cells of patients with testicular tumors. J. Ultrastruct. Res.67, 267–275.
Smetana, K., Gyorkey, F., Gyorkey, P., Busch, H., 1971: Compact filamentous bodies of nuclei and nucleoli of human prostate gland. Exp. Cell Res.64, 133–139.
Tourte, Y., 1975: étude ultrastructurale de l'oogenèse chez une Ptéridophyte: lePteridium aquilinum (L) Kuhn I. évolution des structures nucléaires. J. Microscop. Biol. Cell.22, 87–108.
Vagner-Capodano, A. M., Mauchamp, J., Stahl, A., Lissitsky, S., 1980: Nucleolar budding and formation of nuclear bodies in cultured thyroid cells stimulated by thyrotropin, dibutyryl cyclic AMP, and prostaglandin E2. J. Ultrastruct. Res.70, 37–51.
—,Bouteille, M., Stahl, A., Lissitsky, S., 1982: Nucleolar ribonucleoprotein release into the nucleoplasm as nuclear bodies in cultured thyrotropin-stimulated thyroid cells: Autoradiographic kinetics. J. Ultrastruct. Res.78, 13–25.
Weber, A., Whipp, S., Usenik, E., Frommes, S., 1964: Structural changes in the nuclear body in the adrenal zona fasciculata of the calf following the administration of ACTH. J. Ultrastruct. Res.11, 564–576.
Williams, M. A., Kleinschmidt, J. A., Krohne, G., Franke, W. W., 1982: Argyrophilic nuclear and nucleolar proteins ofXenopus laevix oocytes identified by gel electrophoresis. Exp. Cell Res.137, 341–351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, L.M., Jordan, E.G. & Barlow, P.W. The ultrastructure of nuclear bodies in interphase plant cell nuclei. Protoplasma 118, 95–103 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293065
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01293065