Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation and documentation of hybridization betweenParkinsonia aculeata andCercidium praecox (Leguminosae:Caesalpinioideae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphometric, cytogenetic, geographical and ecological evidence for hybridization betweenParkinsonia aculeata andCercidium praecox is presented. Morphometric investigation using the character count procedure and cytogenetic observations confirm hybrid status. All diagnostic morphometric characters were intermediate in the hybrid. Both parents (2n = 28) show regular tetrad formation and pollen fertility greater than 94%. Hybrids have a chromosome number of 2n = 28 or 2n = 30, and display meiotic abnormalities including lagging chromosomes and micronucleus formation; less than 21% of hybrid pollen was fertile. Ecological and geographical information suggests that hybridization is occurring at increasing frequency due to the expanding range ofP. aculeata associated with cultivation as an ornamental, coupled with ecological disturbance and weediness, and the cultivation ofC. praecox and hybrids as fodder, ornamental and shade trees. Hybrid fertility and phenological observations, in conjunction with F-weighted principal component analysis, suggest that the progeny of F1 hybrids are established. The hybrid is formally described asP. ×carterae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R. J., 1992: Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. — Trends Ecol. Evol.7: 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. P., 1982: A comparison of multivariate methods for the detection of hybridization. — Taxon31: 646–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., 1949: Introgressive hybridization. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1938: Hybridization inTradescantia. III. The evidence for introgressive hybridization. — Amer. J. Bot.25: 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. E., 1954: Hoyer's solution as a rapid permanent mounting medium for bryophytes. — Bryologist57: 242–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atchison, E., 1951: Studies in theLeguminosae. VI: Chromosome numbers among tropical woody species. — Amer. J. Bot.38: 538–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, R. M., Farrington, O. S., 1987: A morphometric study of ×Orchiaceras bergonii (Nanteuil)Camus and its parents (Aceras anthropophorum (L.)Aiton f. andOrchis simia Lamarck) in Kent. — Watsonia16: 397–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenan, J. P. M., 1963: Notes on AfricanCaesalpinioideae: the genusPeltophoropsis Chiov. and its relationship. — Kew Bull.17: 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: A new species ofParkinsonia (Leguminosae) from Somalia. — Kew Bull.35: 563–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, A., 1957: Las Leguminosas Argentinas. — Buenos Aires: Acme Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Notas en el generoCercidium (Caesalpinioideae) en Sud America. — Darwiniana20: 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A. M., 1974a: The genusCercidium (Leguminosae:Caesalpinioideae) in the Sonoran Desert of Mexico. — Proc. Calif. Acad. of Sci.40: 17–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974b: Evidence for the hybrid origin ofCercidium ×sonorae (Leguminosae:Caesalpinioideae) of northwestern Mexico. — Madroño22: 266–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: Pollen studies in relation to hybridization inCercidium andParkinsonia (Leguminosae:Caesalpinioideae). — Madroño22: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, A. D., Fairchild, L. M., 1953: A quick-freeze method for making smear slides permanent. — Stain Technology28: 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimmit, M. A., 1987: The hybrid Palo Verde “Desert Museum”: a new, superior tree for desert landscapes. — Desert Plants8: 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, D. L., 1993: Botanical research and herbarium management system, ver. 1. — Oxford, UK: Oxford Forestry Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, A. V., 1988: Técnicas y procedimientos de citogenética vegetal. Chapingo, Mexico: Colegio de Posgraduados de Chapingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1981: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975–1978. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.5.

  • - 1984: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1979–1981. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.8.

  • - 1985: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1982–1983. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.13.

  • - 1988: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1984–1985. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.23.

  • -Johnson, D. E., 1990: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1986–1987. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.30.

  • - - 1991: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1988–1989. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.40.

  • - - 1994: Index to plant chromosome numbers 1990–1991. — Monogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard.51.

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1972: Levels of confidence in the analysis of hybridization in plants. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.59: 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C., 1966: Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. — Biometrika53: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausery, E. J. P., Morrison, J. H., 1964: The cytochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium as an index of pollen viability. — Amer. J. Bot.51: 748–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J. A., 1996: Systematics ofParkinsonia L. andCercidium Tul. (Leguminoseae:Caesalpinioideae). — D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J. C., 1993: The Jepson Manual: higher plants of California. — Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. E., 1989: Intensive study of multipurpose tree genetic resources. — Oxford Forestry Institute, UK: Unpubl. report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, C. J., 1983: Primary data in hybrid analysis. — InPlatnick, N. I., Funk, V. I., (Eds): Advances in cladistics: proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, pp. 89–103. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isely, D., 1975:Leguminosae of the United States: II. SubfamilyCaesalpinioideae, Parkinsonia. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.25: 169–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C., 1971: The karyotype in systematics. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.2: 327–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. M., 1924: Taxonomic records concerning American spermatophytes. 1.Parkinsonia andCercidium. — Contrib. Gray Herb.70: 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. E., 1978: Pollinator constancy as a pre-pollination isolating mechanism between sympatric species ofCercidium. — Evolution32: 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., Vaudor, A., 1991: The R Package: multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. — Montreal.

  • Marks, G. E., 1983: Evidence for the occurrence of dispensable and disadvantageous chromatin. — InBrandham, P. E., Bennett, M. D., (Eds): Kew Chromosome Conference II, pp. 269–272. — London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBride, J. F., 1943: Flora of Peru. — Fieldiana13. — Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, L. A., 1990: Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expression in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. — Evolution44: 1685–1700.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. II. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. — Evolution46: 1329–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Hybridization and phylogenetics. — InHoch, P. C., Stephenson, A. G., (Eds): Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, pp. 305–331. — St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, R., 1987: Flora Novo-Galiciana: a descriptive account of the vascular plants of western Mexico.5. — Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miege, J., 1962: Quatrieme liste de nombres chromosomiques d'especes d'Afrique occidentale. — Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég.24: 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab, 1991: Minitab Statistical Software, Release 8.2. — Pennsylvania: Minitab Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G., 1983: Reticulation in cladograms. — InPlatnick, N. I., Funk, V. I., (Eds): Advances in cladistics: proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, pp. 105–111. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polhill, R. M., Vidal, J. E., 1981:Caesalpineae. — InPolhill, R. M., Raven, P. H., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics,1, pp. 81–95. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., Kyhos, D. W., Hill, A. J., 1965: Chromosome numbers of spermatophytes, mostly Californian. — Aliso6: 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., 1995: The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. — Amer. J. Bot.82: 944–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Molecular evidence and plant introgression. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics, pp. 151–176. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about hybridization? — C. R. C. Crit. Rev. Pl. Sci.12: 213–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: Character expression, phylogenetic reconstruction and the detection of reticulate evolution. — InHoch, P. C., Stephenson, A. G., (Eds): Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, pp. 333–353. — St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Arbelaez, E., 1956: Plantas utilisadas de Colombia. — Bogota: Rolda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. E., 1979: Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative biogeography. — Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.162: 267–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, B. S., 1993: Natural hybridization within the genusQuercus L. — Ann. Sci. Forest.50, Suppl. 1: 73s-90s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, C. S., 1889: Notes upon some North American trees V. — Gard. & Forest.2: 388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1981: Biometry. 2nd edn. — San Fransisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somaroo, B. H., Grant, W. F., 1971: An interspecific diploid hybrid ofLotus (Leguminosae) with a B chromosome. — Canad. J. Genet. Cytol.13: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, C. A., 1975: Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1989: Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. — London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafleu, F. A., Cowan, R. S., 1983: Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn.4. — Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1945: Cytological analysis of species hybrids, 2. — Bot. Rev.11: 463–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. L., Dunsdon, A. J., Hellin, J. J., Hughes, C. E., 1992: Wood biomass estimation of Central American dry zone trees. — Trop. Forest. Pap.26. — Oxford: Oxford Forestry Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, K., 1993: The holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data. — Cladistics9: 275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., 1956: Chromosome numbers in theLeguminosae. I. — Amer. J. Bot.43: 577–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1960: Chromosome numbers in theLeguminosae. III. Species of the southwestern United States and Mexico. — Amer. J. Bot.47: 603–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. H., 1969: The role and taxonomic treatment of hybrids. — Bioscience19: 785–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Reticulistics: the recognition of hybrids and their role in cladistics and classification. — InPlatnick, N. I., Funk, V. I., (Eds): Advances in cladistics: proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, pp. 63–79. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S., 1876: Descriptions of new species of plants, chiefly Californian, with revisions of certain genera:Parkinsonia Torreyana. — Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts11: 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H., 1980: A distance coefficient as a hybridization index: an example usingMimulus longifolius andM. flemingii (Scrophulariaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, California. — Taxon29: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. G., Miller, I. L., 1987:Parkinsonia aculeata in the Northern Territory. — Technical Bulletin106. — Australia: Department of Industries and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P., 1992: On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. — Taxon41: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W., 1992: Phytophagous insects collected fromParkinsonia aculeata (Leguminoseae:Caesalpiniaceae) in the Sonoran Desert region of the southwestern United States and Mexico. — Entomophaga373: 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkins, J.A., White Olascoaga, L., Hughes, C.E. et al. Investigation and documentation of hybridization betweenParkinsonia aculeata andCercidium praecox (Leguminosae:Caesalpinioideae). Pl Syst Evol 216, 49–68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985100

Key words

Navigation