Abstract
Concepts of primitive angiosperm flowers have changed in recent years due to new studies on relic archaic groups, new paleobotanical finds and the addition of molecular biological techniques to the study of angiosperm systematics and evolution.Magnoliidae are still the hot group, but emphasis is now on small primitive flowers with few organs and also on the great lability of organ number. Of the extant groups, a potential basal position of the paleoherbs has been discussed by some authors. Although some paleoherbs have a simple gynoecium with a single orthotropous ovule, anatropous ovules may still be seen as plesiomorphic in angiosperms. Anatropy is not necessarily a consequence of the advent of closed carpels. It may also exhibit biological advantages under other circumstances as is the case in podocarps among gymnosperms. Valvate anthers have now been found in most larger subgroups of theMagnoliidae (recently also in paleoherbs) and in some Cretaceous fossils. Nevertheless, as seen from its systematic distribution, valvate dehiscence is not necessarily plesiomorphic for the angiosperms, but may be a facultative by-product of the thick connectives and comparatively undifferentiated anther shape inMagnoliidae and lowerHamamelididae. A perianth is relatively simple in extantMagnoliidae or even wanting in some families. In groups with naked flowers the perianth may have been easily lost because integration in the floral architecture was less pronounced than in more advanced angiosperm groups. Problems with the comparison of paleoherb flowers with those ofGnetales are discussed. The rapid growth of information from paleobotany and molecular systematics requires an especially open attitude towards the evaluation of various hypotheses on early flower evolution in the coming years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arber, E. A. N., Parkin, J., 1908: Studies on the evolution of the angiosperms. The relationship of the angiosperms to theGnetales. — Ann. Bot.22: 489–515.
Bernhardt, P., Thien, L. B., 1987: Self-isolation and insect pollination in the primitive angiosperms: new evaluations of older hypotheses. — Pl. Syst. Evol.156: 159–176.
Bertin, R. I., Newman, C. M., 1993: Dichogamy in angiosperms. — Bot. Rev.59: 112–152.
Bouman, F., 1971: Integumentary studies in thePolycarpicae I.Lactoridaceae. — Acta Bot. Neerl.20: 565–569.
Burger, W. C., 1978: ThePiperales and the monocots. Alternative hypotheses for the origin of monocotyledonous flowers. — Bot. Rev.43: 345–393.
Carlquist, S., 1964: Morphology and relationships ofLactoridaceae. — Aliso5: 421–435.
—, 1990: Wood anatomy and relationships ofLactoridaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 1498–1504.
Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Olmstead, R. G., Morgan, D., Les, D. H., Mishler, B. D., Duvall, M. R., Price, R. A., Qiu, Y.-L., Kron, K. A., Rettig, J. H., Conti, E., Palmer, J. D., Manhart, J. R., Sytsma, K. J., Michaels, H. J., Kress, W. J., Karol, K. G., Clark, W. D., Hedrén, M., Gaut, B. S., Jansen, R. K., Kim, K.-J., Wimpee, C. F., Smith, J. F., Furnier, G. R., Strauss, S. H., Xiang, Q.-Y., Plunkett, G. M., Soltis, P. S., Swensen, S. M., Williams, S. E., Gadek, P. A., Quinn, C. J., Eguiarte, L. E., Golenberg, E., Learn, G. H. Jr.,Graham, S. W., Barrett, S. C. H., Dayanandan, S., Albert, V. A., 1993: Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 528–580.
Cornet, B., 1989: The reproductive morphology and biology ofSanmiguelia lewisii, and its bearing on angiosperm evolution in the Late Triassic. — Evol. Trends Pl.3: 25–51.
Crane, P. R., 1985: Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.72: 716–793.
—, 1988: Major clades and relationships in the “higher” gymnosperms. — InBeck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and evolution of gymnosperms, pp. 218–272. — New York: Columbia University Press.
—, 1989: Reproductive structure and function in CretaceousChloranthaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.165: 211–226.
—, 1993: Early Cretaceous (Early to Middle Albian) platanoid inflorescences associated withSapindopsis and leaves from the Potomac Group of eastern North America. — Syst. Bot.18: 328–344.
Crawford, D. J., Stuessy, T. F., Silva, O. M., 1986: Leaf flavonoid chemistry and the relationships of theLactoridaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.153: 133–139.
Crepet, W. L., Friis, E. M., Nixon, K. C., 1991: Fossil evidence for the evolution of biotic pollination. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. LondonB 333: 187–195.
—, 1992: Oldest fossil flowers of hamamelidaceous affinity, from the Late Cretaceous of New Jersey. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89: 8986–8989.
Delpino, F., 1890: Applicazione di nuovi criterii per la classificazione delle piante. Terza memoria. — Mem. R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Bologna, Ser. IV,10: 565–599.
Dickison, W. C., 1992: Morphology and anatomy of the flower and pollen ofSaruma henryi Oliv., a phylogenetic relict of theAristolochiaceae. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club119: 392–400.
Dilcher, D. L., 1989: The occurrence of fruits with affinities toCeratophyllaceae in Lower and mid-Cretaceous sediments. — Amer. J. Bot.76 (6, Abstr.): 162.
—, 1992: The concept of the flower and its most primitive expression. Abstr. of the Katherine Esau International Symposium—Plant structure: concepts, connections, and challenges. — Davis: University of California.
Donoghue, M. J., Doyle, J. A., 1989: Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships ofHamamelidae. — InCrane, P. R., Blackmore, S., (Eds): Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of theHamamelidae, 1, pp. 17–45. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Doyle, J., 1945: Developmental lines in pollination mechanisms in theConiferales. — Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc.24: 43–62.
Doyle, J. A., 1994: Origin of the angiosperm flower: a phylogenetic perspective. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] (in press).
—, 1986a: Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. — Bot. Rev.52: 321–431.
—, 1986b: Relàtionships of angiosperms andGnetales: a numerical cladistic analysis. — InSpicer, R. A., Thomas, B. A., (Eds): Systematic and taxonomic approaches in palaeobotany, pp. 177–198. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.
—, 1992: Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. — Brittonia44: 89–106.
—, 1993: Phylogenies and angiosperm diversification. — Paleobiol.19: 141–167.
—, 1976: Pollen and leaves from the mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. — InBeck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and early evolution of angiosperms, pp. 139–206. — New York: Columbia University Press.
—, 1991: Diversification of early angiosperm pollen in a cladistic context. — InBlackmore, S., Barnes, S. H., (Eds): Pollen and spores, pp. 169–195. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.
—, 1990: Early Cretaceous tetrads, zonasulcate pollen, andWinteraceae. II. Cladistic analysis and implications. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 1558–1568.
Drinnan, A. N., Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R., 1990: Lauraceous flowers from the Potomac Group (mid-Cretaceous) of eastern North America. — Bot. Gaz.151: 370–384.
Duvall, M. R., Clegg, M. T., Chase, M. W., Clark, W. D., Kress, W. J., Hills, H. G., Eguiarte, L. E., Smith, J. F., Gaut, B. S., Zimmer, E. A., Learn, G. H. Jr., 1993: Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequence data. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 607–619.
Ehrendorfer, F., 1971:Spermatophyta, Samenpflanzen. — InDenffer, D., Schumacher, W., Mägdefrau, K., Ehrendorfer, F., (Eds): “Strasburger”, Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen, 30th edn, pp. 584–741. — Stuttgart: Fischer.
Endress, P. K., 1980: Floral structure and relationships ofHortonia (Monimiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.133: 199–221.
—, 1986: Reproductive structures and phylogenetic significance of extant primitive angiosperms. — Pl. Syst. Evol.152: 1–28.
—, 1987a: Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.108: 417–438.
—, 1987b: TheChloranthaceae: reproductive structures and phylogenetic position. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.109: 153–226.
—, 1990a: Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.39: 153–175.
—, 1990b: Evolution of reproductive structures and functions in primitive angiosperms (Magnoliidae). — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.55: 5–34.
—, 1993:Federico Delpino and early views on angiosperm origin and macroevolution. — Dissertationes Botanicae196: 77–83. — Berlin: Cramer.
—, 1994a: Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. — InCutler, D. F., Rudall, P., (Eds): The Monocotyledons. — Kew: Royal Botanical Gardens (in press).
- 1994b: Evolutionary aspects of the floral structure inCeratophyllum. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] (in press).
—, 1994c: Shapes, sizes, and evolutionary trends in stamens ofMagnoliidae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.115: 429–460.
—, 1989: The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns amongMagnoliidae. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.100: 45–85.
Erbar, C., Leins, P., 1983: Zur Sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.103: 433–449.
- - 1994: Flowers inMagnoliidae and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of the angiosperms. I. The relationships between flowers ofMagnoliidae andAlismatidae. — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] (in press).
Friedman, W. E., 1990: Double fertilization inEphedra, a nonflowering seed plant: its bearing on the origin of angiosperms. — Science247: 951–954.
Friis, E. M., Endress, P. K., 1990: Origin and evolution of angiosperm flowers. — Adv. Bot. Res.17: 99–162.
—, 1991: Stamen diversity and in situ pollen of Cretaceous angiosperms. — InBlackmore, S., Barnes, S. H., (Eds): Pollen and spores. Patterns of diversification, pp. 197–224. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gottsberger, G., 1988: The reproductive biology of primitive angiosperms. — Taxon37: 630–643.
—, 1992: Diversität der Bestäubung und Reproduktionsbiologie von ursprünglichen Angiospermen. — Stapfia28: 11–27.
Herendeen, P. S., Crepet, W. L., Nixon, K. C., 1993:Chloranthus-like stamens from the Upper Cretaceous of New Jersey. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 865–871.
Heslop-Harrison, Y., Shivanna, K. R., 1977: The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. — Ann. Bot.41: 1233–1258.
Hufford, L. D., Endress, P. K., 1989: The diversity of anther structures and dehiscence patterns amongHamamelididae. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.99: 301–346.
Ito, M., 1987: Phylogenetic systematics of theNymphaeales. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)100: 17–35.
Johri, B. M., Ambegaokar, K. B., Srivastava, P. S., 1992: Comparative embryology of angiosperms.1. — Berlin: Springer.
Kubitzki, K., 1993a: Introduction. — InKubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The families and genera of vascular plantsII, pp. 1–12. — Berlin: Springer.
—, 1993b:Lactoridaceae. — InKubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The families and genera of vascular plantsII, pp. 359–361. — Berlin: Springer.
Lammers, T. G., Stuessy, T. F., Silva, O. M., 1986: Systematic relationships of theLactoridaceae, an endemic family of the Juan Fernandez Islands, Chile. — Pl. Syst. Evol.152: 243–266.
Lehmann-Baerts, M., 1967: Etudes sur les Gnétales—VIII. Ontogenèse ovulaire chezGnetum africanum etEphedra distachya. — Cellule66: 313–327.
Leins, P., Erbar, C., 1985: Ein Beitrag zur Blütenentwicklung der Aristolochiaceen, einer Vermittlergruppe zu den Monokotylen. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.107: 343–368.
—, 1991: Entwicklungsmuster in Blüten und ihre mutmaßlichen phylogenetischen Zusammenhänge. — Biol. Uns. Zeit21: 197–204.
Leroy, J.-F., 1993: Origine et évolution des plantes à fleurs. Les Nymphéas et le génie de la nature. — Paris: Masson.
Les, D. H., 1988: The origin and affinities of theCeratophyllaceae. — Taxon7: 326–345.
—, 1993:Ceratophyllaceae. — InKubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The families and genera of vascular plantsII, pp. 246–250. — Berlin: Springer.
—, 1991: Molecular evolutionary history of ancient aquatic angiosperms. — Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA88: 10119–10123.
—, 1992a: A phylogeny of the ancient genusCeratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae) derived from DNA sequence data. — Amer. J. Bot.79 (6, Abstr.): 151.
—, 1992b: Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic position of the enigmatic island endemicLactoris fernandeziana (Lactoridaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.79 (6, Abstr.): 152.
Liang, H.-X., Tucker, S. C., 1989: Floral development inGymnotheca chinensis (Saururaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.76: 806–819.
—, 1990: Comparative study of the floral vasculature inSaururaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 607–623.
Lloyd, D. G., Webb, M. S., 1992: Reproductive biology of a primitive angiosperm,Pseudowintera colorata (Winteraceae), and the evolution of pollination systems in theAnthophyta. — Pl. Syst. Evol.181: 77–95.
Loconte, H., Stevenson, D. W., 1990: Cladistics of theSpermatophyta. — Brittonia42: 197–211.
—, 1991: Cladistics of theMagnoliidae. — Cladistics7: 267–296.
Martens, P., 1971: Les Gnétophytes. — InZimmermann, W., Carlquist, S., Ozenda, P., Wulff, H. D., (Eds): Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie, 2nd edn. Spezieller Teil,XII (2). — Berlin: Borntraeger.
Meeuse, A. D. J., 1963: From ovule to ovary: a contribution to the phylogeny of the megasporangium. — Acta Biotheor.16: 127–182.
—, 1974: The inner integument—its probable origin and homology. — Acta Bot. Neerl.23: 237–249.
Moseley, M. F. Jr.,Mehta, I. J., Williamson, P. S., Kosakai, H., 1984: Morphological studies of theNymphaeaceae (sensu lato). XIII. Contributions to the vegetative and floral structure ofCabomba. — Amer. J. Bot.71: 902–924.
Neumayer, H., 1924: Die Geschichte der Blüte. — Abh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien14 (1): 1–112.
Nikiticheva, Z. I., 1981: Embryological features of somePiperales. — Acta Soc. Bot. Polon.50: 329–332.
—, 1981: The development of the ovule, embryo sac, and endosperm in the species ofPeperomia (Piperaceae). — Bot. Ž. (Moscow & Leningrad)66: 1388–1398.
Nixon, K. C., Crepet, W. L., Stevenson, D., Friis, E. M., 1994: A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.81 (in press).
Nozeran, R., 1955: Contribution à l'étude de quelques structures florales. — Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., Sér. 11,16: 1–224.
Ørgaard, M., 1991: The genusCabomba (Cabombaceae)—a taxonomic study. — Nordic J. Bot.11: 179–203.
Pedersen, K. R., Crane, P. R., Drinnan, A. N., Friis, E. M., 1991: Fruits from the mid-Cretaceous of North America with pollen grains of theClavatipollenites type. — Grana30: 577–590.
Pellmyr, O., 1992: Evolution of insect pollination and angiosperm diversification. — Trends Ecol. Evol.7: 46–49.
Philipson, W. R., 1993:Amborellaceae. — InKubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., Bittrich, V., (Eds): The families and genera of vascular plantsII, 92–93. — Berlin: Springer.
Qiu, Y.-L., Chase, M. W., Les, D. H., Parks, C. R., 1993: Molecular phylogenetics of theMagnoliidae: a cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.80: 587–606.
Retallack, G., Dilcher, D. L., 1981: Arguments for a glossopterid ancestry of angiosperms. — Paleobiology7: 54–67.
Schneider, E. L., 1978: Morphological studies of theNymphaeaceae. IX. The seed ofBarclaya longifolia Wall. — Bot. Gaz.139: 223–230.
—, 1982: Morphological studies of theNymphaeaceae. XII. The floral biology ofCabomba caroliniana. — Amer. J. Bot.69: 1410–1419.
Schöffel, K., 1932: Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. — Planta17: 315–371.
Sehgal, A., Mohan Ram, H. Y., 1981: Comparative developmental morphology of two populations ofCeratophyllum L. (Ceratophyllaceae) and their taxonomy. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.82: 383–456.
Shamrov, I. I., 1983: Anthecological investigation of three species of the genusCeratophyllum (Ceratophyllaceae). — Bot. Ž. (Moscow & Leningrad)68: 1357–1365.
Skottsberg, C., 1953: The natural history of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island2. — Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Sugawara, T., 1987: Taxonomic studies ofAsarum sensu lato III. Comparative floral anatomy. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)100: 335–348.
Takaso, T., Bouman, F., 1986: Ovule and seed ontogeny inGnetum gnemon L. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)99: 241–266.
Taylor, D. W., 1991: Angiosperm ovules and carpels: their characters and polarities, distribution in basal clades, and structural evolution. — Postilla208: 1–40.
—, 1990: An Aptian plant with attached leaves and flowers: implications for angiosperm origin. — Science247: 702–704.
—, 1992: Phylogenetic evidence for the herbaceous origin of angiosperms. — Pl. Syst. Evol.180: 137–156.
Tobe, H., Stuessy, T. F., Raven, P. H., Oginuma, K., 1993: Embryology and karyomorphology ofLactoridaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 933–946.
Tomlinson, P. B., 1991: Pollen scavenging. — Natl. Geogr. Res. Explor.7: 188–195.
—, 1992: Aspects of cone morphology and development inPodocarpaceae (Coniferales). — Int. J. Pl. Sci.153: 572–588.
—, 1991: Pollination drop in relation to cone morphology inPodocarpaceae: a novel reproductive mechanism. — Amer. J. Bot.78: 1289–1303.
Tucker, S. C., 1984: Origin of symmetry in flowers. — InWhite, R. A., Dickison, W. C., (Eds): Contemporary problems in plant anatomy, pp. 351–395. — Orlando: Academic Press.
—, 1985: Initiation and development of inflorescence and flower inAnemopsis californica (Saururaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.72: 20–31.
-Bourland, J. A., 1994: Ontogeny of staminate and carpellate flowers ofSchisandra glabra (Schisandraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol. [Suppl.] (in press).
Weberling, F., 1970: Weitere Untersuchungen zur Morphologie des Unterblattes bei den Dikotylen. V.Piperales. — Beitr. Biol. Pfl.46: 403–434.
Wettstein, R., 1907: Handbuch der systematischen Botanik2, 1st edn. — Leipzig: Deuticke.
Winter, A. N., 1993: Some aspects of the reproductive biology ofHydrostemma longifolium (Barclaya longifolia) (Barclayaceae). — Bot. Ž. (St. Petersburg)78 (1): 69–83.
Wolf, M., 1991: Blütenphyllotaxis vonNymphaeaceae: Ist das Androecium vonNymphaea, Nuphar etc. spiralig? 10. Symposium Morphologie, Anatomie und Systematik, Göttingen, Abstr.: 85.
Zavada, M. S., Taylor, T. N., 1986: Pollen morphology ofLactoridaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.154: 31–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Endress, P.K. Floral structure and evolution of primitive angiosperms: Recent advances. Pl Syst Evol 192, 79–97 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985910
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985910