Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between three species ofFestuca sect.Bovinae (Poaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seed protein electrophoresis confirms the existence of polymorphism among hexaploid populations ofFestuca arundinacea. Both protein and morphological results suggest thatF. pratensis andF. arundinacea should retain independent specific status. High protein homology of these two species withF. gigantea points towards phylogenetic links between these taxa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulinska-Radomska, Z., 1982: Systematics ofLolium, Festuca andVulpia. — Ph.D. thesis. University of Birmingham (U.K.).

  • Clifford, H. T., Stephenson, W., 1975: An Introduction to Numerical Taxonomy. — London: Acad. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. J., 1969: Disc electrophoresis. 2. Methods and application to human serum. — Annals of the N.Y. Academy of Science121, 404–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. V., 1953a: A survey of meiotic behaviour in tall fescue grass. — Amer. J. Bot.40, 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, P., Lewis, J., Borrill, M., 1972: Studies inFestuca. 2. Fertility relationships between species of sectionBovinae andScariosae and their affinities withLolium. — Genetica43, 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Bernaldez, F., Borrill, M., Lindner, R., 1969: Variability of hexaploidFestuca arundinacea 1. Principal components analysis of correlation matrix. — Biol. R. Soc. Espaniola Hist. Nat. (Biol.)67, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackel, E., 1882: Monographia Festucarum Europeanum. — Kassel und Berlin: Theodor Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkin, T. J., 1955a: Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. 9.Festuca arundinacea with some otherFestuca species. — J. Genet.53, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1955b: Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. 10. Some of the breeding interaction ofFestuca gigantea. — J. Genet.53, 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1955c: Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in forage grasses. 11. Some of the interactions ofFestuca pratensis. — J. Genet.53, 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. J., 1963: Hybrids between geographical races ofF. arundinacea Schreb. — Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stat.1962, 26–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, C. P., Thomas, P. T., 1966: Karyotypic studies in someLolium andFestuca species. — Caryologia19, 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1967: Cytological relationship and genome structure of someFestuca species. — Caryologia20, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, F., 1940: The hybridF. arundinacea ×F. pratensis and some of its derivatives. — Bot. Notiser1940, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulinowski, S., 1966: Preliminary studies on interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in grasses of theFestuca andLolium genera. — Genetica Polonica7, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, D., 1978: CLUSTAN user manual. — University Program Unit, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bulinska-Radomska, Z., Lester, R.N. Relationships between three species ofFestuca sect.Bovinae (Poaceae). Pl Syst Evol 149, 135–140 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984158

Key words

Navigation