Skip to main content
Log in

New variation and biosystematic patterns detected by allozyme and morphological comparisons inLimnanthes sect.Reflexae (Limnanthaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixty-one populations ofLimnanthes sect.Reflexae were surveyed for variation at 19 allozyme loci and reassessed for their morphological diversity and biosystematic relationships. Cluster analysis of allozyme data at individual population level provided evidence for a fairly good fit with the earlier systematic work on this genus but both morphological and allozyme data together defined some new clusters as well as exceptional entities. For example, only var.rosea of the fourL. douglasii varieties described byMason (1952) on the basis of geographical distribution, flower color and leaf morphology, remained as a distinct entity; the others were realigned along new geographic boundaries.L. striata appeared to have two well-developed subgroups, one of which was closely related to theL. douglasii complex. Further ecogeographic and hybridization studies are needed to fully describe these new phenetic findings in the context of phylogenetic inference. SectionInflexae was readily distinguished from sect.Reflexae by several diagnostic loci, thus supporting the validity of this division. Interspecific variation levels and population differentiation inLimnanthes were high when compared to other plant taxa, possibly indicating highly dynamic evolutionary processes for which variable habitats and extreme subdivision within species have been suggested as explanations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, W. W., Ayala, F. J., Michod, R. E., 1977: Chromosomal and allozyme diagnosis of three species ofDrosophila. — J. Hered.68, 71–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avise, J. C., Aquadaro, C. F., 1982: A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates: Patterns and correlations. — Evol. Biol.15, 151–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F. J., Tracey, M. L., Hedgecock, D., Richmond, R. C., 1974: Genetic differentiation during speciation process inDrosophila. — Evolution28, 576–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D. J., Wilson, H. D., 1979: Allozyme variation in several closely related diploid species ofChenopodium of western United States. — Amer. J. Bot.66, 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J., Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., Frame, J. W., Hill, M. A., Jennrich, R. I., Toporek, J. D., 1981: BMDP Statistical Software. — Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T., Baum, B. R., 1981: Numerical phenetics: Its uses in botanical systematics. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.12, 387–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D., 1973: Enzyme differentiation and phylogeny inClarkia franciscana, C. rubicunda andC. amoena. — Evolution27, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1974: Genetic confirmation of the origin ofClarkia lingulata. — Evolution28, 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. — Progress in Phytochemistry7, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptli, H., Webster, S. K., 1978: Variation in nutlet morphology ofLimnanthes. — Amer. J. Bot.65, 615–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S. K., Moyle, P., (Ed.), 1984: Vernal Pools and Intermittent Streams. — Institute of Ecology, Univ. Calif., Davis, 278 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., 1977: The organization of genetic diversity inPhlox drummondii. — Evolution31, 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Genetic variation in annualPhlox: Self-compatible versus self-incompatible species. — Evolution32, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., 1974: The Genetics Basis of Evolutionary Change. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. T., Jr., 1952: A systematic study of the genusLimnanthes R. Br. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.25, 455–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, C. I., Jain, S. K., 1983: Genetic differentiation studies and phylogenetic inference in the plant genusLimnanthes (SectionInflexae). — Theor. Appl. Genet.66, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, L. D., 1979: A comparison of two methods for making statistical inferences on Nei's measure of genetic distance. — Biometrics35, 757–763.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munz, P. A., Keck, D. D., 1959: A California Flora. — Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. — Amer. Nat.106, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1973: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. — Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.70, 3321–3323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1969:Limnanthes vinculans, a new California endemic. — Brittonia21, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1971: Systematic studies ofLimnanthaceae. — Madroño21, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1968: Numerical taxonomy ofLimnanthaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.55, 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. H., 1976: Systematics and plant population biology. — Syst. Bot.1, 284–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Origin and Relationships of the California Flora. — Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Raven, T. E., 1976: The genusEpilobium in Australasia. — New Zealand Dept. of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin216.

  • Rick, C. M., Kesicki, E., Fobes, J. F., Holle, M., 1976: Genetic and biosystematic studies on two new sibling species ofLycopersicon from interandean Peru. — Theor. Appl. Genetics47, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharitz, R. R., Wineriter, S. A., Smith, M. H., Liu, E. H., 1980: Comparison of isozymes amongTypha species in the eastern United States. — Amer. J. Bot.67, 1297–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., Sokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical Taxonomy. — San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1974: Flowering Plants, Evolution Above the Species Level. — Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1965: Endemism and speciation in the California flora. — Ecol. Monogr.35, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, S., Orton, T., (Eds.), 1983: Isozymes: Genetics and Breeding. — Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A. R., 1981: Mechanism of speciation—a population genetic approach. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.12, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J. P., 1982: The molecular clock hypothesis: Biochemical evolution, genetic differentiation and systematics. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.13, 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, R. K., Jr., 1978: Case studies in the evolution of species complexes inMimulus. — Evol. Biol.11, 405–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D. B., 1981: The application of allozyme evidence to problems in the evolution of morphology. — In: Evolution Today, Proc. Sec. Int. Congr. Syst. Evol. Biol. (Scudder, G. G. E., Reveal, J. L., eds.), pp. 257–270.

  • White, M. J. D., 1978: Modes of Speciation. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kesseli, R.V., Jain, S.K. New variation and biosystematic patterns detected by allozyme and morphological comparisons inLimnanthes sect.Reflexae (Limnanthaceae). Pl Syst Evol 147, 133–165 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984586

Key words

Navigation