Skip to main content
Log in

Die Gattungsmerkmale vonSchizoboea (Gesneriaceae-Didymocarpeae)

The generic characters ofSchizoboea (Gesneriaceae-Didymocarpeae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The two characters used byBurtt (1974) to segregate the genusSchizoboea fromDidymocarpus, viz. “terminal inflorescence” and “fruit splitting into 4 valves”, have been studied in detail: (a) The “terminal inflorescence” represents a bracteate florescence (sensuTroll), that is an open thyrse, peculiar because of its only two extremely condensed internodes (“basic internode” + 1 following internode). Correspondingly, there are only two pairs of bracts from which the lower one only is capable to develop axillary partial florescences, i.e. pair-flowered cymes. Thus, the number of cymes is restricted to 2. Because of the condensed internodes, the inconspicuous bracts, and the densely aggregated flowers the two cymes simulate a unitary, terminal structure. By sympodial (± asymmetrically dichasial) linkage of shoot units, composed of an extended internode, a foliage leaf pair (from the axils of which the consecutive units arise) and the florescence,Schizoboea forms (polytelic) anthocladial shoot systems like some genera of the tribeKlugieae (incl.Loxonieae). (b) The fruit dehisces first loculicidally, then each valve splits into three portions (lateral rib and 2 semivalves). Moreover, the 4 placentae become isolated, thus the old fruit comprises 10 elements forming a loose fascicle.—The segregation ofSchizoboea fromDidymocarpus is supported. Whether the affinity is closer toSaintpaulia (as suspected byBurtt) ot toDidymocarpus, remains undecided: In regard to its shoot and inflorescence organization a morphological derivation is possible from both genera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Burtt, B.L., 1974: Studies in theGesneriaceae of the Old World. XXXVII.Schizoboea, the erstwhile africanDidymocarpus. — Not. Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb.33, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K., 1931: Blütenbildung und Sproßgestaltung (Anthokladien und Infloreszenzen). — Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., 1964: Die Infloreszenzen. Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Bd. 1. — Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., 1976: Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik derKlugieae undLoxonieae (Gesneriaceae). IV. Wuchsform, Infloreszenz- und Blütenmorphologie vonEpithema. — Pl. Syst. Evol.126, 287–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Id. VI. Morphologie und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen vonLoxonia undStauranthera. — Flora166, 153–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978a: Id. VII. Sproß-, Infloreszenz- und Blütenbau vonRynchoglossum. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.99, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978b: Id. VIII. Ein typologischer Vergleich zwischenRhynchoglossum klugioides undLoxonia. — Linzer Biol. Beitr.10, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978c: Transitions from pair-flowered to normal cymes inGesneriaceae. — Not. Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb.36, 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, A. Die Gattungsmerkmale vonSchizoboea (Gesneriaceae-Didymocarpeae). Pl Syst Evol 134, 183–192 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986798

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986798

Key words

Navigation