Abstract
Impact scoping is the process of identifying important issues of a proposal and focusing the environmental impact assessment (EIA) on the high-priority issues. Although impact scoping in one form or another has been inherent to EIA for some time, documentation of its development and discussion of refinements to impact scoping processes have not been forthcoming. This article traces the development of impact scoping through time and highlights the need for such processes in EIA. A focused environmental assessment (FEA) approach to impact scoping that is suitable for implementation in an EIA is presented here and advantages of its use are delineated. FEA is a three-staged process that encourages impact scoping through progressive steps including impact identification, assessment and management planning. FEA combines a suite of EIA methods including: issues matrices, impact hypotheses, valued ecosystem components, and stakeholder participation sessions to effectively integrate impact scoping with EIA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Beanlands, G. 1985. Ecology and impact assessment in Canada. Pages 23–46In J. V. Maclaren and J. Whitney (eds.), New directions in EIA in Canada. Methuen Publications Agincourt, Ontario.
Beanlands, G. 1988. Scoping methods and baseline studies in EIA. Pages 52–88in P. Wathern (ed.), Environmental Impact Assessment Theory and Practice. Unwin Hyman, London.
Beanlands, G. E., and P. N. Duinker. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia.
CEARC (Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Committee). 1988. Evaluating environmental impact assessment: An action prospectus. Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality). 1981. Scoping guidance. Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC.
DIAND (Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 1984. Beaufort Environmental Monitoring Project: 1983–1984 Final report. DIAND, Ottawa, Canada
DIAND (Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 1986. Mackenzie Valley environmental monitoring project. Final report 1984–1986. DIAND, Ottawa, Canada.
DND (Department of National Defence). 1989. Goose Bay EIS final report and summary. Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.
Dome Petroleum Ltd, Esso Resources Canada Ltd., and Gulf Canada Resources Inc. 1982. Beaufort Sea-Mackenzie Delta environmental impact statement. Calgary, Alberta, Canada (unpublished).
Duffy, P. 1986. Initial assessment guide. Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Hull, Quebec, Canada.
Environmental Canada. 1983. Review and evaluation of adaptive environmental assessment and management. Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Everitt, R. R., D. A. Birdsall, and D. Stone. 1986. The Beaufort Sea monitoring program. Pages 251–266in R. Lang (ed.), Integrated approaches to resource planning and management. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta.
Green J. E., A. J. Kennedy, and G. J. Mann. 1990. Impact scoping in EIA for major projects—the OSLO project experience. Environmental control/hazardous waste conference. Haztech Canada Conference, 6–7 November 1990. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Kennedy, A. 1991. Towards a focused environmental assessment process: A new approach to impact scoping for environmental assessments. PhD thesis. The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (in preparation).
Leopold, L. B., F. E. Clarke, and B. B. Henshaw. 1971. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact. Geological Survey Circular, Washington D.C.
Marshall, D. W., and L. S. Wolfe. 1985. Identification and analysis of environmental issues associated with Beaufort Sea hydrocarbon production and transportation. Pages 101–107in Proceedings of 8th annual meeting of the International Society of Petroleum Industry Biologists, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Marshall, D. W., W. A. Ross, and B. Sadler. 1986. On scoping in EARP. Federal Environmental Assessment and Review Office, Vancouver, BC, Canada (unpublished).
Munn, 1979. Environmental impact assessment: Principles and procedures. Scope 5. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Rosenburg, D. M., V. H. Resh, et al. 1981. Recent trends in environmental impact assessment.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources 38(5):591–624.
Ross, W. A. 1987a. Evaluating environmental impact statements.Journal of Environmental Management 25:137–147.
Ross, W. A. 1987b. Scoping in Canadian environmental assessment reviews. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Seminar on EIA. Warsaw, Poland. 21–25 September 1987.
Sadler, B. 1986. Impact assessment in transition: A framework for redeployment. Pages 46–54in R. Lang (ed.), Integrated approaches to resource management. The Banff Center School of Management, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Whitney, J. R., and V. W. Maclaren. 1985. Environmental impact assessment: The Canadian experience. University of Toronto, Institute for Environmental Studies, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wolfe, L. S. 1987. Methods for scoping environmental impact assessments. A review of the literature and experience. Federal Environmental Assessment and Review Office, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, A.J., Ross, W.A. An approach to integrate impact scoping with environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 16, 475–484 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394123
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394123