Skip to main content
Log in

Structural and evolutionary implications of the packaging of DNA for differentiation and proliferation in the lymphocyte

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

During the differentiation of the clonally distributed lymphocytes of mouse and man into mature resting B and T cells, their DNA becomes tightly packed into dense heterochromatin masses and exhibits very little transcriptional activity; it also becomes extensively nicked, containing some 3000–4000 single-strand breaks per diploid genome. The nuclear matrix is sparse and poorly organized and there are but trace amounts of the matrix-linked enzyme DNA topoisomerase II; the nucleus of these small cells is surrounded by a thin rim of cytoplasm. The resting cell can thus be considered (by analogy to a sperm cell) as a vector for transporting tightly packed and relatively inert genetic information to all parts of the body. When the lymphocyte is stimulated to enter a proliferative cycle by binding of appropriately presented antigen or mitogen to relevant membrane receptors, the cell enlarges, due to increased synthesis of protein; the dense heterochromatin is pulled out into very small clumps, as a result of an enormous growth in size as well as complexity of the nuclear matrix, and a great increase in transcriptional activity occurs. We have identified four nuclear matrix antigens that are very widely conserved in the evolution of eucaryotes and that occupy distinctive domains in interphase nuclei. Of particular interest is antigen P1, detected in organisms ranging from algae to mammals. By virtue of its location at the interface between nuclear envelope and chromatin, we propose that it plays a major and evolutionarily conserved role in chromatin organization and orientation in all eucaryotic cell types. Prior to these events, the DNA strand breaks are rejoined by a mechanism dependent on poly(ADP ribose) synthetase; rejoining of the breaks is required in order for the cells to enter the S phase of the cell cycle. Under certain experimental conditions, the induction of DNA topoisomerase II is clearly seen to precede DNA replication; topoisomerase II may be involved in some of the nuclear changes of blastogenesis. The evidence suggests that induction of single-strand breaks in DNA may be a general feature in the evolution of differentiated somatic cells. The selective advantage of the endogenously produced DNA strand breaks may be to provide an additional mechanism that prevents the differentiated cell from replicating its genome in the absence of an appropriate proliferative signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burnet FM (1986) The clonal selection theory of immunity. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaly N, Brown DL, Kaplan JG (1986a) The lymphocyte at rest and at work. Bioessays 4:26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaly N, Sabour MP, Silver JC, Aitchison WA, Little JE, Brown DL (1986b) Monoclonal antibodies against nuclear matrix detect nuclear antigens in mammalian, insect and plant cells: an immunofluorescence study. Cell Biol Int Rep 10:421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derenzini M (1979) Fine structure of chromatin as visualized in thin sections with the Gautier selective stain for DNA. J Ultrastruct Res 69:239–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derenzini M, Pession-Brizzi A, Betts-Eusebi C, Novello F (1981) Relationship between the fine structural organization of chromatin and nucleic acid synthesis in regenerating rat hepatocytes. J Ultrastruct Res 75:229–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo S, Voelkel K, Sternglanz R (1984) DNA topoisomerase II mutant ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae: topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 2616–2620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dover G (1986) Molecular drive in multi-gene families. Trends Genet 2:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzaneh F, Zalin R, Brill D, Shall S (1982) DNA strand breaks and ADP-ribosyl transferase activation during cell differentiation. Nature 300:362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill BL, Sawick W, Croce CM, Koprowski H (1972) DNA synthesis in rabbit spermatozoa after treatment with lysolecithin and fusion with somatic cells. Exp Cell Res 73:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowans JL, McGregor DD, Cowen DM, Ford CE (1962) Initiation of immune responses by small lymphocytes. Nature 196:651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greer WL, Kaplan JG (1983) DNA strand breaks in murine lymphocytes: induction by purine and pyrimidine analogues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 115:834–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greer WL, Kaplan JG (1984) Regulation of naturally occurring DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 122:366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greer WL, Kaplan JG (1986) Early nuclear events in lymphocyte proliferation: the role of DNA strand break repair and ADP ribosylation. Exp Cell Res 166:399–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, Donnelly AJ, Nowell PC, Beck S (1959) The chromosome constitution of a human phenotypic intersex. Am J Hum Genet 11:215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerne NK (1977) Cited in: Loor F, Roelants GE (eds) B and T cells in immune recognition. John Wiley & Sons, London, pp xv-xvi

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone AP, Williams GT (1982) Role of DNA breaks and ADP-ribosyl transferase activity in eukaryotic differentiation demonstrated in human lymphocytes. Nature 300:368–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan JG (1983) Early cytoplasmic and nuclear events in lymphocyte activation. In: Parker JW, O'Brien RL (eds) Intercellular communication in leucocyte function, p 469

  • Longo FJ (1973) Fertilization: a comparative ultrastructural review. Biol Reprod 9:149–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKay DJ, Remaux BS, Dixon GH (1986) Human sperm protamines, amino-acid sequences of two forms of protamine P2. Eur J Biochem 156:5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad KVS, Severini A, Kaplan JG (1987) Sodium ion influx in proliferating lymphocytes: an early component of the mitogenic signal. Arch Biochem Biophys 252:515–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ringertz NR, Bolund L (1974) The nucleus during avian erythroid differentiation. In: Busch H. (ed) Cell biology, vol 3, Academic Press, New York, pp 417–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahai BM, Kaplan JG (1986a) On the possible role of type II topoisomerase in the transition of quiescent cells into cycling cells. Cozzarelli N, Wang J (org) Meeting on: Biological effects of DNA topology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor NY, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahai BM, Kaplan JG (1986b) A quantitative decatenation assay for type II topoisomerases. Anal Biochem 156:365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahai BM, Kowalski D (1986) Large changes in DNA topoisomerase activity mark the transition between quiescent and proliferating cells. Cozzarelli N, Wang J (org) Meeting on: Biological effects of DNA topology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor NY, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Segel GB, Simon W, Lichtman MA (1979) Regulation of sodium and potassium transport in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human blood lymphocytes. J Clin Invest 64:834–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield G, Hall R, Bladon T, Little J, Kaplan JG (1983) Changes in structure and composition of lymphocyte nuclei during mitogenic stimulation. J Ultrastruct Res 82:264–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Severini A, Prasad KVS, Greer WL, Kaplan JG (1986) Sodium ion influx: an essential early signal in lymphocyte proliferation. In: Oppenheim J, Jacobs DM (eds) Leukocytes and host defense. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 123–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandou G, Mirambeau G, Lavenot C, der Garabedian A, Vermeerach J, Duguet M (1986) DNA topoisomerase activities in concanavalin A-stimulated lymphocytes. FEBS Lett 176: 431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricoli JV, Sahai BM, McCormick PJ, Jarlinski SJ, Bertram JS, Kowalski D (1985) DNA topoisomerase I and II activities during cell proliferation and cell cycle in cultured mouse embryo fibroblast (C3H10T 1/2) cells. Exp Cell Res 158:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Liu LF (1979) DNA topoisomerases: enzymes that catalyze the concerted breaking and rejoining of DNA backbone bonds. In: Taylor JM (ed) Molecular genetics, part III. Academic Press, New York, pp 65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshihara K, Tanigawa Y, Burzio L, Koide SS (1975) Evidence for adenosine diphosphate ribosylation of Ca2+, Mg2+-dependent endonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:289–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, J.G., Brown, D.L., Chaly, N. et al. Structural and evolutionary implications of the packaging of DNA for differentiation and proliferation in the lymphocyte. J Mol Evol 26, 173–179 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099849

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099849

Key words

Navigation