Skip to main content
Log in

On Exact Solutions for the Rectilinear Steiner Tree Problem Part I: Theoretical Results

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The rectilinear Steiner tree problem asks for a shortest tree connecting given points in the plane with rectilinear distance. The best theoretically analyzed algorithms for this problem are based on dynamic programming and have a running time of O(n 2 . . . 2.62 n ) (Ganley and Cohoon), resp. \(n^{O(\sqrt{n})}\) (Smith). The first algorithm can solve problems of size 27, the second one is highly impractical because of the large constant in the exponent. The best implementations perform poorly even on small problem instances; the best practical results can be reached using a Branch \& Bound approach (Salowe and Warme); this implementation can solve random problems of size 35 within a day, while the dynamic programming approach of Ganley and Cohoon can handle only 27 point examples. In this paper we improve the theoretical worst-case time bound to O(n 2 . . . 2.38 n ) , for random problem instances we prove a running time of α n with a constant α < 2 . We have implemented our algorithms and can now solve problems of 40 points in a day using a provably good dynamic programming approach, and can solve problems of 55 points with a Branch \& Bound strategy. For exponential-time algorithms, this is an enormous improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received April 2, 1997; revised January 5, 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Föß{}meier, U., Kaufmann, M. On Exact Solutions for the Rectilinear Steiner Tree Problem Part I: Theoretical Results. Algorithmica 26, 68–99 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004539910005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004539910005

Navigation