Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

General theory of rank-size distributions in regional settlement systems: Reappraisal and reformulation of the rank-size rule

  • Settlement Structure and Urban Analysis
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, G. R. “The ‘Courbe des Populations’: A Further Analysis,”Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, Vol. 16 (May and June 1954), pp. 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Auerbach, F. “Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration,”Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, Vol. 59 (1913), pp. 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann, M. J. “City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City Size,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 6 (April 1958), pp. 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  4. — and J. C. McPherson. “City Size Distribution in a Central Place Hierarchy: An Alternative Approach,”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 10 (April 1970), pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, B. J. L. “City Size Distributions and Economic Development,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 9 (July 1961), pp. 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  6. —. “Cities as Systems within Systems of Cities,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 13 (1964), pp. 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —. “Research Frontiers in Urban Geography,” in P. L. Hauser and L. F. Schnore (Eds.),The Study of Urbanization. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —.Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  9. — and W. L. Garrison. “Alternate Explanations of Urban Rank-Size Relationships,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 48 (March 1958) pp. 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. —, J. W. Simmons, and R. J. Tennant. “Urban Population Densities: Structure and Change,”Geographical Review, Vol. 53 (July 1963), pp. 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Casetti, E. “Alternate Urban Population Density Models: An Analytical Comparison of their Validity Range,” in A. Scott (Ed.),Studies in Regional Science. London: Pion, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christaller, W.Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena: G. Fischer, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, C. “Urban Population Densities,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 114 (1951), pp. 490–496.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —. “Urban Population Densities,”Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Vol. 36 (Part 4, 1957), pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  15. —.Population Growth and Land Use. London: Macmillan, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curry, L. “The Random Spatial Economy: An Exploration in Settlement Theory,”Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Vol. 54 (March 1964), pp. 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dziewoński, K. “Procesy Urbanizacyjne we Wspólczesnej Polsce. Stopień Poznania, Próba Syntezy,”Przeglad Geograficzny, Vol. 34 (No. 3, 1962), pp. 459–508.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fano, P. L. “Organization, City Size Distributions and Central Places,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 22 (1969), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haggett, P.Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: Arnold, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kania, C. “Metody Analizy “Wielkości i Kolejności Osiedli” na Przykladzie Województwa Opolskiego,”Czasopismo Geograficzne, Vol. 37 (No. 3, 1966), pp. 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  21. King, L. J. “The Analysis of Spatial Form and Its Relation to Geographic Theory: Review Article,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 59 (September 1969), pp. 573–595.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kostrubiec, B. “Badania Rozwoju Prezestrzennego Aglomeracji Miejskiej Metoda Profilów,”Przeglad Geograficzny, Vol. 62 (No. 2, 1970), pp. 235–248.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korzybski, S. “Le Peuplement des Grandes Agglomérations Urbaines. Londres et Paris aux XIX et XX Siéc;es,”Population, Vol. 7 (July–September 1952), pp. 485–520.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —. “Le Profil de Densité de Population dans l'Étude des Zones Urbanies de Londres et de Paris,”La Vie Urbaine-Urbanisme et Habitation, New Series, 1954, No. 2, pp. 113–156.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lopes, S. A. “The Economic Functions of Small Towns and Rural Centers with Special Reference to Portugal,” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Oxford University, 1971.

  26. Lösch, A.Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft. Jena: G. Fischer, 1944, 2nd rev. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lotka, A. J.Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —. “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity,”Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 16 (June 19, 1926), pp. 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —. “The Law of Urban Concentration,” with ‘Comment’ by E. L. Thorndike,Science, Vol. 94 (August 15, 1941), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mandelbrot, B. “An International Theory of the Statistical Structure of Language,” in W. Jackson (Ed.),Communication Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maurer, H. and L. Wiese. “Zum Auerbachschen Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration,”Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, Vol. 59 (1913), pp. 229–232.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Medvedkov, J. W. “Prilozheniia Matematiki k Niektorym Zadacham Ekonomicheskoj Geografii,”Geograficheskij Sbornik, Vol. 1 (1963), pp. 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Newling, B. E. “The Spatial Variation of Urban Population Densities,”Geographical Review, Vol. 59 (April 1969), pp. 242–252.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Papageorgiou, G. J. “A Theoretical Evaluation of the Existing Population Density Gradient Functions,”Economic Geography, Vol. 47 (January 1971), pp. 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Parr, J. B. “City Hierarchies and the Distribution of City Size: A Reconsideration of Beckmann's Contribution,”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 9 (August 1969), pp. 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  36. —. “Models of City Size in an Urban System,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 25 (1970), pp. 221–253.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rapoport, A. “Comment: The Stochastic and the ‘Teleological’ Rationales of Certain Distributions and the So-Called Principle of Least Effort,”Behavioral Science, Vol. 2 (April 1957), pp. 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  38. —. “Rank-Size Relations,” inInternational Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and the Free Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Secchi, B.Analisi Economica dei Problemi Territoriali. Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Saibante, M. “La Concentrazione della Populazione,”Metron, Vol. 7 (March 1928), pp. 53–99.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Simon, H. A. “On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions,”Biometrika, Vol. 42 (December 1955), pp. 425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Singer, H. W. “The ‘Courbe des Populations’: A Parallel to Pareto's Law,”Economic Journal, Vol. 46 (June 1936), pp. 254–263.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thomas, E. N. “Additional Comments on Population-Size Relationships for Sets of Cities,” in W. L. Garrison and D. F. Marble (Eds.),Quantitative Geography (Part I: Economic and Cultural Topics). Northwestern University Studies in Geography, No. 13, 1967.

  44. Thorndike, E. L. “National Unity and Disunity [Review],”Science, Vol. 94 (July 4, 1941), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vapnarsky, C. A. “On Rank-Size Distributions of Cities: An Ecological Approach,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 17 (July 1969), pp. 584–595.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilson, A. G.Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Pion, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zipf, G. K. “On the Economical Arrangement of Tools; The Harmonic Series and the Properties of Space,”Psychological Record, Vol. 4 (September 1940), pp. 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  48. —.National Unity and Disunity. Bloomington, Ind: Principia Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  49. —. “The Unity of Nature, Least-Action, and Natural Social Science,”Sociometry, Vol. 5 (February 1942), pp. 48–62.

    Google Scholar 

  50. —. “The Hypothesis of the Minimum Equation as Unifying Social Principle: With Attempted Synthesis,”American Sociological Review, Vol. 12 (December (1947), pp. 627–650.

    Google Scholar 

  51. —.Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Kazimierz Dziewoński

Authors
  1. Kazimierz Dziewoński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dziewoński, K. General theory of rank-size distributions in regional settlement systems: Reappraisal and reformulation of the rank-size rule. Papers of the Regional Science Association 29, 73–86 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01962286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01962286

Keywords

Search

Navigation